RE: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread David B Harrington
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft > > > > Darren, > > > > > > an "I would like to see this too" is a good indication that a > > > controversal feature is required. I have honestly posted > what I

Re: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Darren Reed
> > Darren, > > > > an "I would like to see this too" is a good indication that a > > controversal feature is required. I have honestly posted what I think so > > that all others can jump in. For the rest, see the archive ;) > > Well, I don't want to disappoint you, but if someone else comes up >

Re: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Darren Reed
> Darren, > > an "I would like to see this too" is a good indication that a > controversal feature is required. I have honestly posted what I think so > that all others can jump in. For the rest, see the archive ;) Well, I don't want to disappoint you, but if someone else comes up with something,

RE: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Rainer Gerhards
OTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 3:14 PM > To: Rainer Gerhards > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft > > > Darren, > > > > I have seen nobody backing your position, so I think it was > consensus to > > i

Re: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Darren Reed
> Darren, > > I have seen nobody backing your position, so I think it was consensus to > ignore these comments. And nobody decrying them either. So are you saying, you need "me too's" on comments before you'll make any replies to issues people bring up ? It shouldn't take everyone to speak out

RE: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Rainer Gerhards
EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft > > > :-) Just a comment on the list: it is my observation that sometimes > > discussion peeks and at other times there is virtually none. For the > > time being, I think everything that needed to be said is

Re: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Darren Reed
> :-) Just a comment on the list: it is my observation that sometimes > discussion peeks and at other times there is virtually none. For the > time being, I think everything that needed to be said is said and so > folks are waiting if I manage to come up with the right text to cover > the consensus

[Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Bazsi, > > many thanks for your mail. I am working on a new draft. But as it is > > xmas time, it's quite busy, so other things also come into > my way. My > > goal is to finish a new version before xmas holiday, but I can not > > totally commit on that. I'd appreciate if you could review > it w

[Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 13:56 +0100, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > Hi Bazsi, > > many thanks for your mail. I am working on a new draft. But as it is > xmas time, it's quite busy, so other things also come into my way. My > goal is to finish a new version before xmas holiday, but I can not > totally comm

[Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Hi Bazsi, many thanks for your mail. I am working on a new draft. But as it is xmas time, it's quite busy, so other things also come into my way. My goal is to finish a new version before xmas holiday, but I can not totally commit on that. I'd appreciate if you could review it when it comes out.