Darren, I have seen nobody backing your position, so I think it was consensus to ignore these comments.
Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: Darren Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 2:30 PM > To: Rainer Gerhards > Cc: Balazs Scheidler; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft > > > :-) Just a comment on the list: it is my observation that sometimes > > discussion peeks and at other times there is virtually none. For the > > time being, I think everything that needed to be said is said and so > > folks are waiting if I manage to come up with the right > text to cover > > the consensus [I hope I will...]. I don't think the silence is > > indication of missing interest. > > Well, there were a few technical issues I raised with...#7(?) that > you never seemed to address. Things like how the hostname and other > fields are all described. The grammar you use in the document is > incorrect. > > Darren > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
