Hello Anton,
first of all, my apologies for the late reply. I wanted to think a
little more about your message and then the vacation season got into my
way. The plus is that I have some additional references to post.
So now let's finally begin with the answer (I am not removing any of
your text
another message after a too-long vacation season ;) Because I had lots
of time to think, this is a LONG message. It's the reply PLUS a
suggestion for an -international-00 change in regard to the metadata
(formerly cookie) format. I am outling a specific problem and potential
solution, so please
Rainer Gerhards wrote:
I see the argument. Do you think that relying on something already
accepted - like BEEP XML in RFC3080 is a solution? As far as I can see,
RFC3080 is increasingly becoming implemented. So while not full XML, it
may be a standard that works as expected?
I believe that
Hi Anton,
The term cookies was first used by John Kelsey in his first drafts of
syslog-sign to denote that the content of the message was somehow special
and should be parsed differently. This sounded like a good idea then and
Rainer used the same approach when he started thinking about
Hi,
There is a real demand in the industry for leveraging existing standards
rather than creating new languages or special syntaxes. The demand is to
reduce the number of special languages an operator needs to learn, and
to make it possible to integrate the data from one application type with
Hi David and others,
There is a real demand in the industry for leveraging
existing standards
rather than creating new languages or special syntaxes. The
demand is to
reduce the number of special languages an operator needs to learn, and
to make it possible to integrate the data from one
Hi David,
Let me start about by saying that I am often curmudgeonly, so please
forgive any negative tone to this message; I am making the
comment to be
constructively critical. I have had experience dealing with problems
similar to those I find in this proposal, so please pay
attention to
(or $.01).
Thanks,
dbh
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:02 AM
To: Harrington, David; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: syslog-protocol: Cookie Format
Hi David and others,
There is a real demand in the industry
Hi Rainer,
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see the argument. Do you think that relying on something already
accepted - like BEEP XML in RFC3080 is a solution? As far as
I can see,
RFC3080 is increasingly becoming implemented. So while not
full
Hi Rainer,
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Gerhards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see the argument. Do you think that relying on something already
accepted - like BEEP XML in RFC3080 is a solution? As far as
I can see,
RFC3080 is increasingly becoming implemented. So while not
full
Rainer:
Sorry if I did not follow earlier discussion and misunderstand
something obvious. But here is my feedback.
I like the key=value approach. A lot! This would be hugely welcome in
syslog and this is a great undertaking! To begin with, we could plug
things like severity and facility because,
11 matches
Mail list logo
