[Syslog] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-syslog-transport-udp-05.txt

2005-11-06 Thread Glenn Mansfield Keeni
Folks, A few minor comments on draft-ietf-syslog-transport-udp-05 a. Page 10.1 the text says This transport does not provide for strong sender authentication. That sort of seems to imply that weak sender authentication is provided for. Is that the intent ? To me it

Re: [Syslog] draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-07.txt

2006-01-18 Thread Glenn Mansfield Keeni
Tom, Apologies for the delay in responding. I have had a look at the syslog MIB, and am confused, at a fairly fundamental level, about the relationship of the MIB to the other documents, RFC3164 and syslog-protocol. The last two have a common framework/architecture, spelt out at the

Re: [Syslog] draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-07.txt

2006-01-22 Thread Glenn Mansfield Keeni
ports /network addresses. The grouping is a feature not a necessaity. I think that it is providing flexibility that will be needed. Am I missing something here ? Tom Petch Glenn - Original Message - From: Glenn Mansfield Keeni [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tom Petch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc

Re: [Syslog] draft-ietf-syslog-device-mib-07.txt

2006-01-25 Thread Glenn Mansfield Keeni
Tom, Getting there; recall that my initial problem is one of understanding what it is the MIB caters for. I had expected the MIB to cater for a pure Sender, in order to configure it with where to send what, and I am slightly suprised at that omission. As ever, it is a question of