]] Lennart Poettering
| Can you elaborate on the precise semantics of pager(1) and
| sensible-pager(1)? I found the latter man pages online and hence added
| this to the things systemctl will now look for by default. But pager
| was a little bit too generic to find anything.
pager(1) is the
On Tue, 04.01.11 09:29, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
]] Lennart Poettering
| Can you elaborate on the precise semantics of pager(1) and
| sensible-pager(1)? I found the latter man pages online and hence added
| this to the things systemctl will now look for by default. But
]] Lennart Poettering
| Hmm, so, given that we check PAGER ourselves, calling sensible-pager is
| of little benefit for us, right? And I probably should change the
| invocation of sensible-pager to pager in my code, so that we search for
| pager, less and more in this order?
Sounds fine.
|
On Tue, 04.01.11 14:20, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
]] Lennart Poettering
| Hmm, so, given that we check PAGER ourselves, calling sensible-pager is
| of little benefit for us, right? And I probably should change the
| invocation of sensible-pager to pager in my code, so that
On Tue, 28.12.10 13:22, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Tue, 28.12.10 00:31, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) said:
vt100-nav|vt100 without advanced video option,
xmc#1,
blink@,
