On Wed, 20.06.12 10:17, Mathieu Bridon (boche...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 19:15 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 19.06.12 18:50, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:03:23AM +0200, Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 08:44 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 20.06.12 10:17, Mathieu Bridon (boche...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 19:15 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 19.06.12 18:50, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 06:44:25PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
This is not about the files from systemd. It's about the dependencies.
Every user of a source based distro, that only wants systemd now has to
first install dbus then udev, and then remove dbus again.
Shouldn't the build system
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:38:22AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 06:44:25PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
This is not about the files from systemd. It's about the dependencies.
Every user of a source based distro, that only wants systemd now has to
first install dbus
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:45:47PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 19.06.12 23:40, Alexander E. Patrakov (patra...@gmail.com) wrote:
IMHO there is one issue with the inetd-style approach: it is
explicitly discouraged in man sshd. It may well be the case of
outdated documentation,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:46:40PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:32:52PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:38:22AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 06:44:25PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
This is not about the files from
2012/6/19 Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Michael Olbrich
m.olbr...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:21:58AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 15.06.12 20:06, Bryan Kadzban (br...@kadzban.is-a-geek.net)
wrote:
dbus
libcap
I am
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:34:52PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:46:40PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:32:52PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:38:22AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Shouldn't the build system do this
'Offline System Updates' will come as feature for Fedora 18. Reading your
official page http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/SystemUpdates:
The system update script now creates a btrfs snapshot (if possible), then
installs all RPMs. After completion (regardless whether the update
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:40:39PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
Currently, the workflow would be like this:
1) build other components
2a) build prerequisites necessary for systemd, which are otherwhise
unneeded; this needs to be installed into the local sysroot in
order to let
On 06/18/2012 10:42 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.06.12 10:04, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu) wrote:
Thanks for any advice!
Hmm, so there are multiple ways to achieve this, but it really depends
on what you are trying to do here. May I ask what kind of script
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:22:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya,
regarding the whole discussion on minimal builds and people wanting to
pick specific parts of the systemd build leaving out others, beyond what
the configure switches offer: Here are some guidelines how we recommend
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 01:46:41PM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
You could easily build dbus-for-systemd inside the systemd buildroot,
and never install dbus to the sysroot, but in a temporary location.
After building the local dbus, system and udev, you just make install
in only the udev
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:49 AM, microcai micro...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
2012/6/21 William Hubbs w.d.hu...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:22:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
regarding the whole discussion on minimal builds and people wanting to
pick specific parts of the
On 06/18/2012 10:42 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.06.12 10:04, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu) wrote:
Thanks for any advice!
Hmm, so there are multiple ways to achieve this, but it really depends
on what you are trying to do here. May I ask what kind of script you
]] William Hubbs
Another thing to think about from our side is, although the main
components compile quickly on a pc, how long would it take to compile
everything on an ARM-based machine for example? I have no idea, so it
could end up being really annoying to users of that platform for us
16 matches
Mail list logo