Hey Lennart,
Lennart Poettering [2013-11-26 5:12 +0100]:
> I implemented this now, using a different approach than Martin's
> original patch (i.e. I don't think it is a good idea to involve stat()
> here, instead let's just let logind pass all information to
> pam_systemd).
Thanks!
Lennart Poet
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Not following here. What precisely does this fix, can you elaborate?
>
> We currently turn off the poll for the socket fds as soon as we queued
> the service socket, so that we don't get woken up anymore. What would
> EPOLLET do good her
On Fri, 22.11.13 18:56, Shawn Landden (sh...@churchofgit.com) wrote:
> With EPOLLONESHOT we are guaranteed to only recieve one event
> until we reload with socket_enter_listening(s), otherwise
> multiple events can be generated upon receipt of multiple chunks of
> data.
Not following here. What p
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:13:35AM +0200, Patrik Flykt wrote:
> Require a main loop to be set when creating a DHCP client. Set up
> a timer to resend DHCP Discover messages and add a 0-2 second
> delay to the timeout value. Move to state Selecting after successful
> sending of a Discover message.
>
On Thu, 21.11.13 07:55, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> > So, what's the intention here? That XDG_RUNTIME_DIR is entirely unset
> > after "su"? That sounds kinda acceptable to me.
> Yes, for "su -" and pkexec. It might not work for "su" as that is
> likely configured to not run PAM,
On Wed, 20.11.13 19:19, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote:
> > So yeah, there your mix
> > and match is broken:
>
> I'm proposing a simple goal: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR should always be that
> matching the current uid. I can't think of any case where you'd
> want it otherwise.
That can't work.
On Thu, 21.11.13 00:36, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> I do like Martin's original patch, since by unsetting XDG_RUNTIME_DIR it
> basically tells apps "Hey, all bets are off, you are fucked", and
> doesn't pretend XDG_RUNTIME_DIR would still work. Because it doesn't.
I imple
On Sat, 23.11.13 18:51, Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello (marcos...@gmail.com)
wrote:
>
> 2013/11/20 Lennart Poettering :
> > On Tue, 19.11.13 14:18, Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello (marcos...@gmail.com)
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> I am trying to disable HDDs power management in a systemd
On Sun, 24.11.13 12:44, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we can make the output of systemd-analyze blame more useful with cpu
> accounting information.
>
> The output of systemd-analyze blame is not making so much sense when
> lots of programs are tried t
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> Any plans to support existing applications that are making use of thread
> level resource management? If not, what are we left with then, posix thread
> priorities?
Kay is right; there is no direct replacement. However, it's possi
On Mon, 25.11.13 16:01, Shawn Landden (sh...@churchofgit.com) wrote:
> ---
> src/nspawn/nspawn.c | 5 +
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/nspawn/nspawn.c b/src/nspawn/nspawn.c
> index 0973a00..1ee4ab3 100644
> --- a/src/nspawn/nspawn.c
> +++ b/src/nspawn/nspawn.c
> @@ -2
On Mon, 25.11.13 19:12, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:40:05AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 25.11.13 15:20, Dave Reisner (dreis...@kemper.freedesktop.org)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > uint64_t can be formatted correctly with %ju, rather than
On Tue, 26.11.13 01:00, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24.11.13 22:36, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Interesting case (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852021).
> > Systemd enters emergency due to failed mount. At the same time sys
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 25.11.13 15:20, Dave Reisner (dreis...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
>>
>>> uint64_t can be formatted correctly with %ju, rather than casting to
>>> unsigned a
2013/11/26 Shawn Landden :
> +log_error("Root directory %s is not
> accessable: %m", optarg);
s/accessable/accessible/
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
__
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:40:05AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 25.11.13 15:20, Dave Reisner (dreis...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
>
> > uint64_t can be formatted correctly with %ju, rather than casting to
> > unsigned and potentially losing accuracy.
>
> Oh, shouldn't we
---
src/nspawn/nspawn.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/nspawn/nspawn.c b/src/nspawn/nspawn.c
index 0973a00..1ee4ab3 100644
--- a/src/nspawn/nspawn.c
+++ b/src/nspawn/nspawn.c
@@ -200,6 +200,11 @@ static int parse_argv(int argc, char *argv[]) {
case
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 25.11.13 15:20, Dave Reisner (dreis...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
>
>> uint64_t can be formatted correctly with %ju, rather than casting to
>> unsigned and potentially losing accuracy.
>
> Oh, shouldn't we be careful
On Sun, 24.11.13 22:36, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Interesting case (https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852021).
> Systemd enters emergency due to failed mount. At the same time syslog
> socket triggers syslog.service. Due to implicit Requires on
> basic.target which
On Mon, 25.11.13 15:20, Dave Reisner (dreis...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
> uint64_t can be formatted correctly with %ju, rather than casting to
> unsigned and potentially losing accuracy.
Oh, shouldn't we be careful with that? %j is for intmax_t. Which might
or might not be int64_t.
On Mon, 25.11.13 09:13, Patrik Flykt (patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> -static int client_receive_offer(DHCPClient *client,
> -DHCPPacket *offer, int len)
> +static int client_verify_headers(DHCPClient *client,
> + DHCPPacket *m
On Mon, 25.11.13 09:13, Patrik Flykt (patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> +static int client_receive_raw_message(sd_event_source *s, int fd,
> + uint32_t revents, void *userdata)
> +{
> +DHCPClient *client = userdata;
> +int len, buflen;
> +
On Mon, 25.11.13 09:13, Patrik Flykt (patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> -DHCPClient *sd_dhcp_client_new(void)
> +DHCPClient *sd_dhcp_client_new(sd_event *event)
> {
> DHCPClient *client;
>
> +assert_return(event, NULL);
> +
> client = new0(DHCPClient, 1);
>
On Mon, 25.11.13 09:13, Patrik Flykt (patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> +int dhcp_network_send_raw_packet(int index, void *packet, int len);
Should be "const void* packet", no?
And "size_t len", no?
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
sy
On Mon, 25.11.13 09:13, Patrik Flykt (patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> +#include
> +
> +#include "protocol.h"
> +
> +int dhcp_option_append(uint8_t **buf, int *buflen, uint8_t code,
This is a memory size, right? It should be size_t rather than
On Mon, 25.11.13 09:13, Patrik Flykt (patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> +
> +DHCPClient *sd_dhcp_client_new(void)
> +{
> +DHCPClient *client;
> +
> +client = new0(DHCPClient, 1);
> +if (!client)
> +return NULL;
> +
> +client->state = DHCP_STATE_
On Mon, 25.11.13 09:13, Patrik Flykt (patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> After that I noticed someting interesting when setting a monotonic timer
> event to go off at time 0. It seems to repeatedly call the timer event
> without stopping, either due to the next timer computation going wrong in
On Mon, 25.11.13 23:14, Yin Kangkai (kangkai@intel.com) wrote:
> Otherwise there is some memory corruption and undefined behavior,
> e.g., in my case systemd-udev was always aborted at the
> _cleanup_freep_ around that code blocks.
Thanks! Applied!
> Signed-off-by: Yin Kangkai
We don't do
On Mon, 25.11.13 18:26, Lukasz Skalski (l.skal...@partner.samsung.com) wrote:
> Now code form src/shared don't use code of shared libs directly.
> It solves cyclic dependencies in the same way as sd_utf_is_valid()
> from src/libsystemd-bus/sd-utf8.c and src/shared/utf8.c.
Hmm, I'd prefer just mov
Now code form src/shared don't use code of shared libs directly.
It solves cyclic dependencies in the same way as sd_utf_is_valid()
from src/libsystemd-bus/sd-utf8.c and src/shared/utf8.c.
---
src/libsystemd-bus/sd-bus.c | 64 +
src/libsystemd-bus/test-bus-m
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
>> wrote:
>>> How do we support thread level resource management with the new cgroup
>>> abstraction?
> How do we do it in
Hi,
On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> wrote:
>> How do we support thread level resource management with the new cgroup
>> abstraction?
How do we do it in the process level then. Lets say a service has 5 processes
unde
Otherwise there is some memory corruption and undefined behavior,
e.g., in my case systemd-udev was always aborted at the
_cleanup_freep_ around that code blocks.
Signed-off-by: Yin Kangkai
---
src/shared/conf-parser.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/share
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Lukasz Skalski
wrote:
> On 11/25/2013 02:03 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Lukasz Skalski
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please find patch in attachement for review - it fix problem
>>> with undefined references in some test-libsystemd-*-sym.c te
On 11/25/2013 02:03 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Lukasz Skalski
wrote:
Please find patch in attachement for review - it fix problem
with undefined references in some test-libsystemd-*-sym.c tests.
It looks a bit weird to add library requirements, theses libs should
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Lukasz Skalski
wrote:
> Please find patch in attachement for review - it fix problem
> with undefined references in some test-libsystemd-*-sym.c tests.
It looks a bit weird to add library requirements, theses libs should
not need the other libraries. What exactly
Please find patch in attachement for review - it fix problem
with undefined references in some test-libsystemd-*-sym.c tests.
---
Makefile.am |5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 728b860..9e03f0a 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -
Dear systemd maintainers,
I've made a pull request on github with some patches:
- Add new po/it.po (Italian translation)
- Revision proposals (wording) on english labels
http://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/7
Best Regards
--
Daniele Medri
___
sys
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 06:20:09PM +1000, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> wrote:
> > I would think port access protocols would be needed for servers even before
> > sending a single IP package.
>
> I've never used a server that required 80
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> I would think port access protocols would be needed for servers even before
> sending a single IP package.
I've never used a server that required 802.1x. I've only encountered
it in places where physical network access is widesprea
40 matches
Mail list logo
