On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> I'm not certain if the current version is gramatically correct, but
> the proposed version seems wrong: there's just one sender, so only
> singular form makes sense.
The current text makes more sense to me.
_
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 11:03:06PM +0100, Stefan Beller wrote:
> ---
> src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1 | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1
> b/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1
> index 90d184b7..750033f 100644
> --- a
Manual tests are those tests which cannot be run automatically. test-ellipsize
simply doesn't do much, but it still makes sense to run it automatically,
because
the code paths get touched, asserts are checked, etc. It also makes a lot of
sense to run it under valgrind. It should stay.
Zbyszek
___
---
src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1
b/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1
index 90d184b7..750033f 100644
--- a/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1
+++ b/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1
We would find this extremely useful. Our #1 long-term feature need is
a containerization tool that supports both socket activation and
selinux. libvirt-lxc has the former, but I'm seeing inconsistent
documentation on the latter. I'd be glad to see systemd-nspawn get
good support.
__
---
Makefile.am | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 8bef21b..dd4e2dc 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -1124,6 +1124,7 @@ manual_tests += \
test-cgroup \
test-install \
test-watchdog \
+ test-
---
src/core/manager.c | 29 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/manager.c b/src/core/manager.c
index 634b141..74fb52d 100644
--- a/src/core/manager.c
+++ b/src/core/manager.c
@@ -1275,9 +1275,10 @@ static int manager_dispatch_notif
On 01/29/14 16:51, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 29.01.14 10:53, dE (de.tec...@gmail.com) wrote:
On enabling a unit, by default systemd will put it in a target which
has been specified in by the unit itself.
Is there any way by which I can make the unit start in any custom
target? Manual l
On 02/02/2014 02:27 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
02.02.2014 20:18, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/02/2014 01:39 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
The patch is obviously harmless. However, I am not convinced that it
is needed, because in my setup (without this patch) there are no lin
02.02.2014 20:18, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 02/02/2014 01:39 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
The patch is obviously harmless. However, I am not convinced that it
is needed, because in my setup (without this patch) there are no links
in /dev/disk pointing to any zram device. You can ch
On 02/02/2014 01:39 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
The patch is obviously harmless. However, I am not convinced that it
is needed, because in my setup (without this patch) there are no links
in /dev/disk pointing to any zram device. You can change my opinion by
providing configuration file
02.02.2014 19:29, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
---
rules/60-persistent-storage.rules | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
b/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
index a4d009a..154ffd9 100644
--- a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
---
rules/60-persistent-storage.rules | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
b/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
index a4d009a..154ffd9 100644
--- a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
+++ b/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
@@ -14,7 +1
02.02.2014 17:23, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
After reading:
http://www.chromestory.com/2013/03/google-enabling-zram-for-chrome-os-by-default/
http://lwn.net/Articles/545244/
I was wondering what would be the best way to use zram on a setup
running systemd. This is because I have found a lot of sc
Hello
After reading:
http://www.chromestory.com/2013/03/google-enabling-zram-for-chrome-os-by-default/
http://lwn.net/Articles/545244/
I was wondering what would be the best way to use zram on a setup
running systemd. This is because I have found a lot of scripts, unit
files... but I don't know w
15 matches
Mail list logo