Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Fix a typo

2014-02-02 Thread David Timothy Strauss
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > I'm not certain if the current version is gramatically correct, but > the proposed version seems wrong: there's just one sender, so only > singular form makes sense. The current text makes more sense to me. _

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Fix a typo

2014-02-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 11:03:06PM +0100, Stefan Beller wrote: > --- > src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1 > b/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1 > index 90d184b7..750033f 100644 > --- a

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] make: test-ellipsize is a manual test

2014-02-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Manual tests are those tests which cannot be run automatically. test-ellipsize simply doesn't do much, but it still makes sense to run it automatically, because the code paths get touched, asserts are checked, etc. It also makes a lot of sense to run it under valgrind. It should stay. Zbyszek ___

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] Fix a typo

2014-02-02 Thread Stefan Beller
--- src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1 b/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1 index 90d184b7..750033f 100644 --- a/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1 +++ b/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/PORTING-DBUS1

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Add SELinux support to systemd-nspawn

2014-02-02 Thread David Timothy Strauss
We would find this extremely useful. Our #1 long-term feature need is a containerization tool that supports both socket activation and selinux. libvirt-lxc has the former, but I'm seeing inconsistent documentation on the latter. I'd be glad to see systemd-nspawn get good support. __

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] make: test-ellipsize is a manual test

2014-02-02 Thread Shawn Landden
--- Makefile.am | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am index 8bef21b..dd4e2dc 100644 --- a/Makefile.am +++ b/Makefile.am @@ -1124,6 +1124,7 @@ manual_tests += \ test-cgroup \ test-install \ test-watchdog \ + test-

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] manager: use CMSG macros

2014-02-02 Thread Shawn Landden
--- src/core/manager.c | 29 + 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/core/manager.c b/src/core/manager.c index 634b141..74fb52d 100644 --- a/src/core/manager.c +++ b/src/core/manager.c @@ -1275,9 +1275,10 @@ static int manager_dispatch_notif

Re: [systemd-devel] Add unit to arbitrary target.

2014-02-02 Thread dE
On 01/29/14 16:51, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 29.01.14 10:53, dE (de.tec...@gmail.com) wrote: On enabling a unit, by default systemd will put it in a target which has been specified in by the unit itself. Is there any way by which I can make the unit start in any custom target? Manual l

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: Adding zram to inappropriate block device

2014-02-02 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 02/02/2014 02:27 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 02.02.2014 20:18, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 02/02/2014 01:39 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: The patch is obviously harmless. However, I am not convinced that it is needed, because in my setup (without this patch) there are no lin

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: Adding zram to inappropriate block device

2014-02-02 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
02.02.2014 20:18, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 02/02/2014 01:39 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: The patch is obviously harmless. However, I am not convinced that it is needed, because in my setup (without this patch) there are no links in /dev/disk pointing to any zram device. You can ch

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: Adding zram to inappropriate block device

2014-02-02 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 02/02/2014 01:39 PM, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: The patch is obviously harmless. However, I am not convinced that it is needed, because in my setup (without this patch) there are no links in /dev/disk pointing to any zram device. You can change my opinion by providing configuration file

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: Adding zram to inappropriate block device

2014-02-02 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
02.02.2014 19:29, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: --- rules/60-persistent-storage.rules | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules b/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules index a4d009a..154ffd9 100644 --- a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: Adding zram to inappropriate block device

2014-02-02 Thread Jóhann B . Guðmundsson
--- rules/60-persistent-storage.rules | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules b/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules index a4d009a..154ffd9 100644 --- a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules +++ b/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules @@ -14,7 +1

Re: [systemd-devel] Regarding how to properly use zram on a systemd setup

2014-02-02 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
02.02.2014 17:23, Pacho Ramos wrote: Hello After reading: http://www.chromestory.com/2013/03/google-enabling-zram-for-chrome-os-by-default/ http://lwn.net/Articles/545244/ I was wondering what would be the best way to use zram on a setup running systemd. This is because I have found a lot of sc

[systemd-devel] Regarding how to properly use zram on a systemd setup

2014-02-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello After reading: http://www.chromestory.com/2013/03/google-enabling-zram-for-chrome-os-by-default/ http://lwn.net/Articles/545244/ I was wondering what would be the best way to use zram on a setup running systemd. This is because I have found a lot of scripts, unit files... but I don't know w