I thought perhaps to file this as a bug report, since the shortcomings are so
glaring, and the three proposed fixes - and documentation updates - are so
specific. But instead, maybe some discussion would be appropriate. I want to
address three issues and corresponding fixes: 1) adding a speci
Hey all,
Some of you might know about the recent discussion in Fedora about
dropping BIOS support[1][2]. While the end result for now is that
we're not dropping it[3], several side discussions involved enabling
systemd-boot as an option in Fedora in the future.
While I *personally* am not a huge
On Di, 26.04.22 12:24, Benjamin Berg (benja...@sipsolutions.net) wrote:
> > In my idealized world, homed would talk to fprintd, asking it for
> > enrollment, then fprintd goes through the enrollment or authentication
> > process, always informing homed about the steps that it is doing which
> > we
On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 11:02 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 25.04.22 18:15, Benjamin Berg (benja...@sipsolutions.net) wrote:
>
> > > So, permitting fingerprint auth while homedir is unlocked might still
> > > be worthy though, i.e. for sudo or polkit kind of reauthentication
> > > during
On Mo, 25.04.22 18:15, Benjamin Berg (benja...@sipsolutions.net) wrote:
> > So, permitting fingerprint auth while homedir is unlocked might still
> > be worthy though, i.e. for sudo or polkit kind of reauthentication
> > during a running session. But for that kind of stuff I'd probably
> > prefer
Hello,
On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 10:11 +0300, juice wrote:
> On 4/26/22 09:41, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > > Using fingerprint for *authentication* is totally broken concept which
> > > should never be allowed.
> > Why? Is a PIN any better?
>
> PIN is much better. You will not be leaving your PIN to any
>>> juice schrieb am 26.04.2022 um 09:11 in Nachricht
<2a780de8-efb2-749b-de43-62978958f...@swagman.org>:
> On 4/26/22 09:41, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>>
>>> Using fingerprint for *authentication* is totally broken concept which
>>> should never be allowed.
>> Why? Is a PIN any better?
>
> PIN is muc
