On Tue, 04.01.11 14:20, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
>
> ]] Lennart Poettering
>
> | Hmm, so, given that we check PAGER ourselves, calling sensible-pager is
> | of little benefit for us, right? And I probably should change the
> | invocation of sensible-pager to pager in my code, so t
]] Lennart Poettering
| Hmm, so, given that we check PAGER ourselves, calling sensible-pager is
| of little benefit for us, right? And I probably should change the
| invocation of sensible-pager to pager in my code, so that we search for
| "pager", "less" and "more" in this order?
Sounds fine.
On Tue, 04.01.11 09:29, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
>
> ]] Lennart Poettering
>
> | Can you elaborate on the precise semantics of pager(1) and
> | sensible-pager(1)? I found the latter man pages online and hence added
> | this to the things systemctl will now look for by default. But
]] Lennart Poettering
| Can you elaborate on the precise semantics of pager(1) and
| sensible-pager(1)? I found the latter man pages online and hence added
| this to the things systemctl will now look for by default. But "pager"
| was a little bit too generic to find anything.
pager(1) is the a
On Sun, 02.01.11 14:07, Miklos Vajna (vmik...@frugalware.org) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:24:02AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen
> wrote:
> > | + if (!pager)
> > | + pager = "less";
> >
> > Doesn't other distributions have sensible-pager(1) or pager(1)? Also,
> > at least on Debian, les
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 01:10:48AM +0100, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> I had merged this already shortly after you posted it and made some
> minor changes to it before you sent the updated patch, but I think I
> added everything you changed later on, too. Tollef, Miklos, could you
> please check i
On Sun, 02.01.11 08:24, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
>
> ]] Miklos Vajna
>
> Hi,
>
> | I hope the subjects describes the patch enough - though I would like to
> | point out one detail. I guess there can be great flames about the
> | default value of LESS if it's unset - I took FRSX a
On Sun, 02.01.11 00:25, Miklos Vajna (vmik...@frugalware.org) wrote:
> I hope the subjects describes the patch enough - though I would like to
> point out one detail. I guess there can be great flames about the
> default value of LESS if it's unset - I took FRSX as that's what git
> uses right now
]] Miklos Vajna
| On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:24:02AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen
wrote:
| > | + if (!pager)
| > | + pager = "less";
| >
| > Doesn't other distributions have sensible-pager(1) or pager(1)? Also,
| > at least on Debian, less(1) isn't in the base distribution, while
| > more(1
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:24:02AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | + if (!pager)
> | + pager = "less";
>
> Doesn't other distributions have sensible-pager(1) or pager(1)? Also,
> at least on Debian, less(1) isn't in the base distribution, while
> more(1) comes from util-linux so is
]] Miklos Vajna
Hi,
| I hope the subjects describes the patch enough - though I would like to
| point out one detail. I guess there can be great flames about the
| default value of LESS if it's unset - I took FRSX as that's what git
| uses right now.
You're not using a default value of LESS, yo
---
Hi,
I hope the subjects describes the patch enough - though I would like to
point out one detail. I guess there can be great flames about the
default value of LESS if it's unset - I took FRSX as that's what git
uses right now.
TODO |2 --
man/systemctl.xml |7 +++
s
12 matches
Mail list logo
