Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] units: disable kmod-static-nodes.service in containers

2013-08-21 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 08/21/2013 02:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hm, Jóhann, are you saying that my ConditionCapability=CAP_MKNOD does not work, or that ConditionVirtualization=!container that I added does not work? Or that it works? I'm was confirming adding "ConditionCapability=CAP_MKNOD" to the k

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] units: disable kmod-static-nodes.service in containers

2013-08-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:03:31AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 08/21/2013 11:00 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >Hi Zbyszek, > > > >Regarding > >: > > > >Would it make sense to use ConditionC

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] units: disable kmod-static-nodes.service in containers

2013-08-21 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 08/21/2013 11:00 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote: Hi Zbyszek, Regarding : Would it make sense to use ConditionCapability=CAP_MKNOD instead? This would match what is done in systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.se

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] units: disable kmod-static-nodes.service in containers

2013-08-21 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > Regarding > : > > Would it make sense to use ConditionCapability=CAP_MKNOD instead? This > would match what is done in systemd-tmpfiles-setup-de

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] units: disable kmod-static-nodes.service in containers

2013-08-21 Thread Tom Gundersen
Hi Zbyszek, Regarding : Would it make sense to use ConditionCapability=CAP_MKNOD instead? This would match what is done in systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service. The effect is currently the same (I thin