On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 21:13 +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
But if the backend code for this flag appears first in Linux 3.14
(https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=479840ffdbe4),
working around the compilation issue (against older uapi headers) will
not
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 06:46 +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
Hi!
On 25/03/15 14:36, Patrik Flykt wrote:
IFA_FLAGS is a discrete value and has no preprocessor #define defined for
it. Fix this by always using the value.
Seems that fix was not a real fix:
CC
On Tue, 07.04.15 16:55, Patrik Flykt (patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 06:46 +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
Hi!
On 25/03/15 14:36, Patrik Flykt wrote:
IFA_FLAGS is a discrete value and has no preprocessor #define defined for
it. Fix this by always using
Hi!
On 07/04/15 15:55, Patrik Flykt wrote:
IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
from README state 3.8/3.7 at the moment.
One could let the sd_rtnl_message_append_u32 for IFA_FLAGS fail in patch
2/3, but then user space has to play tricks with IPv6 DHCPv6
On Tue, 07.04.15 20:01, Alexander Sverdlin (alexander.sverd...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi!
On 07/04/15 19:24, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
[...]
Oh, sorry, the headers are from 3.12, but that's still newer than 3.8 in
Hi!
On 07/04/15 19:06, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
On 07/04/15 15:55, Patrik Flykt wrote:
IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
from README state 3.8/3.7 at the moment.
One could let the sd_rtnl_message_append_u32 for IFA_FLAGS fail in patch
2/3, but then
Hi!
On 07/04/15 19:09, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
from README state 3.8/3.7 at the moment.
One could let the sd_rtnl_message_append_u32 for IFA_FLAGS fail in
patch
2/3, but then user space has to play tricks
Hi!
On 07/04/15 19:24, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
[...]
Oh, sorry, the headers are from 3.12, but that's still newer than 3.8 in
the doc...
actually wrong, but your patch actually brakes compilation for me.
On Tue, 07.04.15 19:24, Alexander Sverdlin (alexander.sverd...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi!
On 07/04/15 19:09, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
from README state 3.8/3.7 at the moment.
One could let the
Hi!
On 07/04/15 20:49, Lennart Poettering wrote:
IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
from README state 3.8/3.7 at the moment.
One could let the sd_rtnl_message_append_u32 for
IFA_FLAGS fail in patch
2/3, but then user space has to play
Hi Lennart,
On 07/04/15 21:09, Lennart Poettering wrote:
IFA_FLAGS seems to appear in kernel ~3.13 and the kernel requirements
[...]
Oh, sorry, the headers are from 3.12, but that's still newer than
3.8 in the doc...
actually wrong, but your patch actually brakes
Hi!
On 25/03/15 14:36, Patrik Flykt wrote:
IFA_FLAGS is a discrete value and has no preprocessor #define defined for
it. Fix this by always using the value.
Seems that fix was not a real fix:
CC src/libsystemd/sd-id128/libsystemd_internal_la-sd-id128.lo
IFA_FLAGS is a discrete value and has no preprocessor #define defined for
it. Fix this by always using the value.
---
src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-types.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-types.c
b/src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-types.c
index
13 matches
Mail list logo
