Hello,
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-28 19:44 +0200]:
I really think this should work as close as the usual *at() calls
work. i.e. take a dir fd as first argument, and a filename
*within*that*directory* to check. Maybe even give it the _at() suffix:
int fd_is_mount_point_at(int fd, const char
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-29 17:31 +0200]:
I think this:
flags = flags ~AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW;
should better be written like this:
flags = ~AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW;
this matches the other if branch better then...
Of course, little brainfart..
Looks good otherwise, please
On Fri, 29.05.15 17:22, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello,
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-28 19:44 +0200]:
I really think this should work as close as the usual *at() calls
work. i.e. take a dir fd as first argument, and a filename
*within*that*directory* to check. Maybe
