On Mon, 02.12.13 15:02, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
> > Well, you already can do some bits of it, like using
> > pthread_setschedparam()/pthread_setschedprio() on individual threads.
> > That will allow you to define different scheduling parameters for your
> > threads.
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
> Sent: den 29 november 2013 13:49
> To: Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> Cc: David Timothy Strauss; systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Kay Sievers
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Thread level r
On Fri, 29.11.13 09:33, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Find my comments below please.
>
> On Nov 29, 2013, at 9:51 AM, David Timothy Strauss
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> > wrote:
> >> Can someone explain the pro
Hi,
Find my comments below please.
On Nov 29, 2013, at 9:51 AM, David Timothy Strauss
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> wrote:
>> Can someone explain the process level management?
>
> Right now, it's possible to do directly in the cgroups file system,
> but w
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> Can someone explain the process level management?
Right now, it's possible to do directly in the cgroups file system,
but we're eventually moving away from anything manipulating that but
systemd. I think that there will still be a w
On Nov 25, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> wrote:
>> On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
>>> wrote:
How do we support thread level resource management
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> Any plans to support existing applications that are making use of thread
> level resource management? If not, what are we left with then, posix thread
> priorities?
Kay is right; there is no direct replacement. However, it's possi
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
>> wrote:
>>> How do we support thread level resource management with the new cgroup
>>> abstraction?
> How do we do it in
Hi,
On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> wrote:
>> How do we support thread level resource management with the new cgroup
>> abstraction?
How do we do it in the process level then. Lets say a service has 5 processes
unde
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> How do we support thread level resource management with the new cgroup
> abstraction?
>
> Can we use scopes with task ids of threads? If so, what is the API to put the
> task id into its own scope unit?
There is no plan at the mo
Hi,
How do we support thread level resource management with the new cgroup
abstraction?
Can we use scopes with task ids of threads? If so, what is the API to put the
task id into its own scope unit?
Thanks.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-deve
11 matches
Mail list logo
