On 27 January 2015 at 21:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:30:48PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 27.01.15 15:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
wrote:
Yes, I think attempting any kind of dependency removal *from
On Thu, 22.01.15 13:54, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
Is there a way to remove / override wants that are specified via
.wants directory, .d snippet with Wants=, or wants specified in the
unit itself?
Dependencies are always additive and coalescing currently. We don't
On 27 January 2015 at 12:42, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 22.01.15 15:16, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
On 22 January 2015 at 14:46, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-01-22 15:08 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov
On 27 January 2015 at 12:38, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 22.01.15 14:08, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
In any case, /etc overrides /run, so your example can never work.
Oh, ok. But any combination of the two. E.g. for /etc to unwant
On Tue, 27.01.15 15:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
Yes, I think attempting any kind of dependency removal *from loaded
units* would be very complicated, and would require major surgery to
current unit engine. And things would become conceptually more complicated,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:30:48PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 27.01.15 15:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
Yes, I think attempting any kind of dependency removal *from loaded
units* would be very complicated, and would require major surgery to
On Tue, 27.01.15 16:18, Christian Seiler (christ...@iwakd.de) wrote:
Or to put it this way: if you take the following things:
- the unit file itself
- all drop-ins
- all .requires.d/
- all .wants.d/
you could combine them (according to precedence rules) to a single large
unit file and
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:36:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 22.01.15 13:54, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
Is there a way to remove / override wants that are specified via
.wants directory, .d snippet with Wants=, or wants specified in the
unit
Am 27.01.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:36:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Dependencies are always additive and coalescing currently. We don't
track which configuration file or automatic logic created which
dependency, and hence it is not
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 03:50:49PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
On 27 January 2015 at 15:18, Christian Seiler christ...@iwakd.de wrote:
Am 27.01.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:36:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Dependencies are
On Thu, 22.01.15 14:08, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
In any case, /etc overrides /run, so your example can never work.
Oh, ok. But any combination of the two. E.g. for /etc to unwant from
/run then, or for /etc to unwant from /usr.
At the moment, I'm looking
On Thu, 22.01.15 15:16, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
On 22 January 2015 at 14:46, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-01-22 15:08 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov dimitri.j.led...@intel.com:
At the moment, I'm looking at packaging symlinks in .wants directories
On 27 January 2015 at 15:18, Christian Seiler christ...@iwakd.de wrote:
Am 27.01.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:36:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Dependencies are always additive and coalescing currently. We don't
track which configuration
On 27 January 2015 at 16:47, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 03:50:49PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
On 27 January 2015 at 15:18, Christian Seiler christ...@iwakd.de wrote:
Am 27.01.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
On Tue,
On 22 January 2015 at 16:32, Andrei Borzenkov arvidj...@gmail.com wrote:
В Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:46:26 +0100
Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com пишет:
2015-01-22 15:08 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov dimitri.j.led...@intel.com:
At the moment, I'm looking at packaging symlinks in .wants directories
On 22 January 2015 at 14:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:54:37PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
Is there a way to remove / override wants that are specified via
.wants directory, .d snippet with Wants=, or wants specified in the
unit
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:54:37PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
Is there a way to remove / override wants that are specified via
.wants directory, .d snippet with Wants=, or wants specified in the
unit itself?
I thought that creating a symlink to /dev/null from a higher up
directory
Is there a way to remove / override wants that are specified via
.wants directory, .d snippet with Wants=, or wants specified in the
unit itself?
I thought that creating a symlink to /dev/null from a higher up
directory would disable wants dependency but it didn't:
e.g.:
I was expecting for
В Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:46:26 +0100
Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com пишет:
2015-01-22 15:08 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov dimitri.j.led...@intel.com:
At the moment, I'm looking at packaging symlinks in .wants directories
under /usr and then allow to uninstall such a package as a means to
On 22 January 2015 at 14:46, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-01-22 15:08 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov dimitri.j.led...@intel.com:
At the moment, I'm looking at packaging symlinks in .wants directories
under /usr and then allow to uninstall such a package as a means to
override the
2015-01-22 15:08 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov dimitri.j.led...@intel.com:
At the moment, I'm looking at packaging symlinks in .wants directories
under /usr and then allow to uninstall such a package as a means to
override the default config. Since I would like to update how the
default config
21 matches
Mail list logo
