Op 16 aug. 2012, om 16:37 heeft Lennart Poettering het
volgende geschreven:
> On Thu, 16.08.12 14:47, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Robin Becker wrote:
>>> However, on my netbooks I like to use the power button to launch oblogout
>>> which b
On 16/08/2012 18:36, Lennart Poettering wrote:
..
Invoke the PowerOff() call on the org.freedesktop.login1.Manager
interface of the /org/freedesktop/login1 object on the
org.freedesktop.login1 service. Which is basically what "systemctl
poweroff" does.
thanks for this.
I think my rout
On Thu, 16.08.12 16:27, Robin Becker (ro...@reportlab.com) wrote:
> However, I'm a bit lost on what's the correct way for a user program
> to signal that it wants to shut down etc. Slim appears to be running
> polkit/consolekit so presumably I can use that, but is there a
> preferred systemd appro
I don't get this. This "oblogout" thing is a graphical tool you spawn
from the system level? Does that mean it runs privileged but accesses
your unprivileged X session? That sounds wrong...
If you have a graphical session then the graphical session should handle
the power/sleep key
On Thu, 16.08.12 13:16, Robin Becker (ro...@reportlab.com) wrote:
> On 16/08/2012 12:47, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Robin Becker wrote:
>
> >
> >It'd be a bit better if the button/lid events were handled by a
> >program running inside the Openbox session
On Thu, 16.08.12 14:47, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Robin Becker wrote:
> > However, on my netbooks I like to use the power button to launch oblogout
> > which brings up a bunch of buttons that allow me to
> > logout/suspend/restart/halt etc etc.
On Thu, 16.08.12 12:23, Robin Becker (ro...@reportlab.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I liked the idea of systemd when I first saw it, but after doing a
> few conversions I have some small issues. I run arch linux with slim
> & openbox and that seems to be fully supported so far as I can tell.
>
> However
...
Openbox is actually running as a user process so it has no greater rights
than the user; that makes the use of a more capable daemon a bit more
reasonable.
No, if your action just runs `oblogout` (and possibly `systemctl
suspend`), then the capabilities of a normal user are sufficient
On 16/08/2012 12:47, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Robin Becker wrote:
It'd be a bit better if the button/lid events were handled by a
program running inside the Openbox session (the events can be read
from /run/acpid.socket).
I'm not exactly sure here, bu
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Robin Becker wrote:
> However, on my netbooks I like to use the power button to launch oblogout
> which brings up a bunch of buttons that allow me to
> logout/suspend/restart/halt etc etc. I can of course continue to use acpid
> to handle the power button, but that
Hi,
I liked the idea of systemd when I first saw it, but after doing a few
conversions I have some small issues. I run arch linux with slim & openbox and
that seems to be fully supported so far as I can tell.
However, on my netbooks I like to use the power button to launch oblogout which
bri
11 matches
Mail list logo
