On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 06:43:04AM +, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
> > Really? No journal messages are getting created at all? No users logging
> > in/out? What does strace show on those processes?
>
> Yes, messages are created - but I'm not interested in them. Maybe a
> user logs in for a
On 08/06/16 03:04, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
>> What processes are showing up in your count? Perhaps it's just a bug that
>> needs to be fixed.
> /bin/dbus-daemon
> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-journald
> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-logind
dbus-daemon will wake up when there are D-Bus messages to be
On 06/08/2016 06:51 AM, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
Thanks for this and the other suggestions!
So for starters we’ll disable logind and dbus, increase watchdogsec
and see where the footprint is – before disabling journald if
necessary in a next step.
You cannot disable journal but you
On Tue, 07.06.16 21:00, Greg KH (gre...@linuxfoundation.org) wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:04:48AM +, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
> > > What processes are showing up in your count? Perhaps it's just a
> > > bug that needs to be fixed.
> > /bin/dbus-daemon
> >
On Tue, 07.06.16 22:17, Hebenstreit, Michael (michael.hebenstr...@intel.com)
wrote:
> Thanks for the answers
>
> > Well, there's no tracking of sessions anymore, i.e. polkit and all that
> > stuff won't work anymore reasonably, and everything else that involves
> > anything graphical and so
, 2016 11:35 AM
To: Hebenstreit, Michael
Cc: Systemd
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] question on special configuration case
This sounds like you could start by unsetting WatchdogSec= for those daemons.
Other than the watchdog, they shouldn't be using any CPU unless explicitly
contacted.
On Wed, Jun 8
el
Cc: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson; Lennart Poettering;
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] question on special configuration case
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:04:48AM +, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
> > What processes are showing up in your count? Perhaps it's just
> From: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson [mailto:johan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 6:10 AM
> To: Hebenstreit, Michael; Lennart Poettering
> Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] question on special configuration case
>
> On 06/07/2016 10:1
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Hebenstreit, Michael
wrote:
>> That what "most" other system designers in your situation do :)
> Unfortunately I cannot reserve a CPU for OS - I'd like to, but the app
> developers insist to use all 254 cores available
Tough
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:04:48AM +, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
> > What processes are showing up in your count? Perhaps it's just a
> > bug that needs to be fixed.
> /bin/dbus-daemon
> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-journald
> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-logind
>
> I understand from the previous
n RH7 kernel
-Original Message-
From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 8:54 AM
To: Hebenstreit, Michael
Cc: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson; Lennart Poettering;
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] question on special config
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:50:36PM +, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
> The base system is actually pretty large (currently 1200 packages) - I
> hate that myself. Still performance wise the packages are not the
> issue. The SSDs used can easily handle that, and library loads are
> only happening
une 08, 2016 6:10 AM
To: Hebenstreit, Michael; Lennart Poettering
Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] question on special configuration case
On 06/07/2016 10:17 PM, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
> I understand this usage model cannot be compared to laptops or web
>
On 06/07/2016 10:17 PM, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
I understand this usage model cannot be compared to laptops or web servers. But
basically you are saying systemd is not usable for our High Performance
Computing usage case and I might better off by replacing it with sysinitV. I
was hoping
gards
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 11:23 PM
To: Hebenstreit, Michael
Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] question on special configuration case
On Tue, 07.06.16 15:13, Heb
On 06/07/2016 03:13 PM, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
we need to keep the OS of our systems are stripped down to an absolute bare
minimum.
If you need absolute bare minimum systemd [¹] then you need to
create/maintain your entire distribution for that ( for example you
would build systemd
Sorry for directing this question here, but I did not find any mailing list
that would be a better fit.
Problem: I'm running an HPC benchmarking cluster. We are evaluating
RH7/CentOS7/OL7 and have a problem with system noise generated by the systemd
components (v 219-19.0.2, see below).
17 matches
Mail list logo