I wonder if it's possible to discuss matters, in any list, without
everything coming out looking like an insult and/or a put-down...
:/
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Dark Penguin wrote:
> Now that systemd manages the shutdown procedure, I don't know if it's
> possible to achieve the sam
Now that systemd manages the shutdown procedure, I don't know if it's
possible to achieve the same behaviour (and thus make NUT work with
systemd).
As already mentioned, it is ouside of scope of OS actually. How you did
it before systemd?
It was actually a feature of NUT - and a default and re
17.09.2016 14:23, Dark Penguin пишет:
>>> Now that systemd manages the shutdown procedure, I don't know if it's
>>> possible to achieve the same behaviour (and thus make NUT work with
>>> systemd).
>>
>> As already mentioned, it is ouside of scope of OS actually. How you did
>> it before systemd?
>
Am 17.09.2016 um 13:23 schrieb Dark Penguin:
Long version:
Many UPS-es do not support cutting power at all, or ignore the command
to cut the power in certain situations. There was a workaround for that:
instead of powering the machines off, they had to halt, then wait a
reasonable amount of tim
Long version:
Many UPS-es do not support cutting power at all, or ignore the command
to cut the power in certain situations. There was a workaround for that:
instead of powering the machines off, they had to halt, then wait a
reasonable amount of time (during which the UPS should turn off), and
th
16.09.2016 20:20, Dark Penguin пишет:
> Greetings!
>
> Short version: is it possible with systemd to have the machine halt,
> wait for a few minutes and then reboot?
>
When system halts OS kernel is stopped and control is returned to
firmware. So the only thing you can do is to program firmware
