2016-02-18 19:16 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Thu, 18.02.16 11:32, Daniel Mack (dan...@zonque.org) wrote:
>
>> On 02/17/2016 08:02 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > src/shared & src/basic have very useful code that upstream have been
>> > static
On 17 February 2016 at 17:17, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 17.02.16 17:03, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 02/17/2016 04:51 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> >Hey,
>> >
>> >[I've put all people in Cc who have had more than one commit related
On Mon, 22.02.16 10:45, Kok, Auke-jan H (auke-jan.h@intel.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:17:51AM -0800, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
> >> Splitting it out increases that potential and will allow
On Wed, 17.02.16 17:03, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>
> On 02/17/2016 04:51 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >Hey,
> >
> >[I've put all people in Cc who have had more than one commit related to
> >systemd-bootchart in the past]
> >
> >As part of our spring cleaning, we've been
On Thu, 18.02.16 11:32, Daniel Mack (dan...@zonque.org) wrote:
> On 02/17/2016 08:02 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > src/shared & src/basic have very useful code that upstream have been
> > static linking to most binaries. My understanding is that we haven’t
> > been feeling
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:17:51AM -0800, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
>> Splitting it out increases that potential and will allow
>> systemd-bootchart to evolve out of cycle again, and look a bit over
>> the
Hello Daniel,
On 17/02/16 17:51, Daniel Mack wrote:
> As part of our spring cleaning, we've been thinking about giving
> systemd-bootchart a new home, in a new repository of its own. I've been
> working on this and put the result here:
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd-bootchart
>
> This
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:17:51AM -0800, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
> wrote:
> > On 02/17/2016 04:51 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >> [I've put all people in Cc who have had more than one commit related to
> >> systemd-bootchart
On 17.2.2016 20:02, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
Hi,
src/shared & src/basic have very useful code that upstream have been static
linking to most binaries. My understanding is that we haven’t been feeling
comfortable about the API to make these paths a standalone library (or include them
in
Hi,
src/shared & src/basic have very useful code that upstream have been static
linking to most binaries. My understanding is that we haven’t been feeling
comfortable about the API to make these paths a standalone library (or include
them in libsystemd).
Now that we started duplicating the
Daniel Mack [2016-02-17 18:09 +0100]:
> Barely anyone of the people working on systemd uses that tool, so it
> sees little testing.
For the record, I have automatic integration tests for that to ensure
that it stays working in principle, i. e. it boots and produces an
.svg file. Of course the
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
> On 02/17/2016 04:51 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> [I've put all people in Cc who have had more than one commit related to
>> systemd-bootchart in the past]
>>
>> As part of our spring cleaning, we've been thinking
On 02/17/2016 06:03 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>
>
> On 02/17/2016 04:51 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> [I've put all people in Cc who have had more than one commit related to
>> systemd-bootchart in the past]
>>
>> As part of our spring cleaning, we've been thinking about giving
>>
On 02/17/2016 04:51 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
Hey,
[I've put all people in Cc who have had more than one commit related to
systemd-bootchart in the past]
As part of our spring cleaning, we've been thinking about giving
systemd-bootchart a new home, in a new repository of its own. I've been
14 matches
Mail list logo