Hi,
My concern was being forward compatible with systemd and you have addressed
my concern.
Thank you.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.netwrote:
On Fri, 08.03.13 14:12, Umut Tezduyar (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
What would be the advantage of
On Fri, 08.03.13 14:12, Umut Tezduyar (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
What would be the advantage of placing an early boot up script in between
local-fs.target/sysinit.target OR in between
sysinit.target/basic.target?
That's a very good question. This hopefully gives a bit of an
Hi,
I would like to bring my discussion back. Any help?
Thanks
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Umut Tezduyar u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
Hi,
What would be the advantage of placing an early boot up script in between
local-fs.target/sysinit.target OR in between sysinit.target/basic.target?
I
Am 08.03.2013 14:12, schrieb Umut Tezduyar:
To summarize, where are users encouraged to place their early boot up
initialization services (ex: setting up the
bandwith on a NIC)?
[root@rh:~]$ systemctl status bandwidth.service
bandwidth.service - Traffic-Shaping
Loaded: loaded
Maybe bandwith wasn't the best example :) But my question is still valid.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 08.03.2013 14:12, schrieb Umut Tezduyar:
To summarize, where are users encouraged to place their early boot up
initialization services
