Hi,
Just a quick note of a wish while I remember. As you've tried very hard
to make "journalctl" without any arguments act mostly like "less
/var/log/messages", one thing I sometimes used to do but no longer can
is scroll to the end of the output (shift+g [or just G if you prefer!])
and then enter
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:15:00PM +0200, jjacky wrote:
>
> On 10/23/12 21:05, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Sat, 13.10.12 14:24, Olivier Brunel (i.am.jack.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> Starting a swap unit pointing to (What) a symlink (e.g. /dev/mapper/swap
> >> or /dev/disk/by-uuid/...) wo
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 02:19:17PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 26.10.12 05:58, Daniel Wallace (danielwall...@gtmanfred.com) wrote:
>
> Heya,
>
> I must say I am a bit concerned about this, and not sure we should
> really merge this. I mean, I applaud your work, but I wonder if this
Dear devs,
I appreciate your work and enjoy getting rid of the one or other package
which is not necessary anymore since its functionality is included in
systemd.
However, in the area of suspend/hibernate, I think it would be helpful,
if the man pages would include more nformation as to which com
Make sure swap_add_one is only called once per unit also for symlinks
---
If, as Lennart indicated was possible, symlinks can be used in /proc/swaps then
the check must be done for symlinks as well.
src/core/swap.c | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sr
Swap units will now be following the unit of the devnode when the swap is off
(and usual following therefore not in place), thus allowing things to work
even in cases such as:
systemctl start 'dev-disk-by\x2dlabel-SWAP.swap' dev-sda3.swap
This first will load and redirect the request to the un
Hi,
I'm working on updating OLPC configuration for systemd-195 based on this info:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-October/111230.html
I can't quite figure out the hostname thing.
We need to set unique hostnames for avahi; machines with the same name
cannot collaborate. Also,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> I'm working on updating OLPC configuration for systemd-195 based on this info:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-October/111230.html
>
> I can't quite figure out the hostname thing.
One more thing to add:
It looks like /et
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 01:38:55PM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > I'm working on updating OLPC configuration for systemd-195 based on this
> > info:
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-October/111230.html
> >
> > I can't qu
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 01:38:55PM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> > I'm working on updating OLPC configuration for systemd-195 based on this
>> > info:
>> > http://lists.f
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:08:48PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 01:38:55PM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> >> > I'm working on updating OLPC conf
This adds SMACK label configuration options to socket units.
SMACK labels should be applied to most objects on disk well before
execution time, but two items remain that are generated dynamically
at run time that require SMACK labels to be set in order to enforce
MAC on all objects.
Files on disk
On Mon, 29.10.12 13:33, Daniel Drake (d...@laptop.org) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on updating OLPC configuration for systemd-195 based on this info:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-October/111230.html
>
> I can't quite figure out the hostname thing.
>
> We need to set uni
On Mon, 29.10.12 13:38, Daniel Drake (d...@laptop.org) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > I'm working on updating OLPC configuration for systemd-195 based on this
> > info:
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-October/111230.html
> >
> > I can'
On Mon, 29.10.12 10:24, Jakob Hetzelein (nasenat...@posteo.de) wrote:
> Dear devs,
>
> I appreciate your work and enjoy getting rid of the one or other package
> which is not necessary anymore since its functionality is included in
> systemd.
>
> However, in the area of suspend/hibernate, I thin
On Fri, 26.10.12 18:39, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote:
> My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and
> obfuscating errors in ways that makes debugging almost impossible.
> Almost every upgrade problem I've had in Fedora has been related to
> systemd's f
Lennart,
I'm going to quickly top post here so forgive me for being rude.
Serge and I worked out some patches that seem to address the devtmpfs
issues nicely. Still got a few oddities to iron out but the big
fundamental one got fixed and is working. Many thanks for that.
The problem with error
On Mon, 29.10.12 15:30, Auke Kok (auke-jan.h@intel.com) wrote:
> This adds SMACK label configuration options to socket units.
Merged!
But made a couple of changes on the way: I think the new confi options
should clarify that you configure the security *label* with them, so I
renamed them to
18 matches
Mail list logo
