On Sat, 02.02.13 15:24, Sébastien Luttringer (se...@seblu.net) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Looking forward to mount custom partitions I decided to use unit.mount
> files to define my new fs. Everything works perfectly, so I tried to
> do the same with all my mounted filesystems and removing /etc/fstab.
Am 04.02.2013 10:18, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Sat, 02.02.13 15:24, Sébastien Luttringer (se...@seblu.net) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Looking forward to mount custom partitions I decided to use unit.mount
>> files to define my new fs. Everything works perfectly, so I tried to
>> do the same
On Fri, 01.02.13 12:50, Jake Edge (j...@lwn.net) wrote:
> [ OK, let's try this again ... since I'm impatient about it sitting in
> the moderator queue, I went ahead and joined up ]
>
> Hi Lennart (and the rest of the systemd gang),
>
> I was quite surprised by some behavior that I found today in
On Fri, 01.02.13 15:10, Jake Edge (j...@lwn.net) wrote:
> It seems a little unfortunate that programs have to "know" what init
> system they are running under. Even if Upstart does change the kernel
> default (I have no idea one way or the other), sysvinit or some other
> init probably doesn't.
On Mon, 04.02.13 10:30, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
Oh, meh, I shouldn't write emails this early in the day.
> Explanations:
>
> As this is an early boot process we need to disable the default
^ "unit" is missing here
> ordering/requirem
On Fri, 01.02.13 10:27, Stef Bon (stef...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > Futher the test_autoseat can check the policy, which can override the
> > > "default" behaviour for this device. This policy is settable by admins.
> >
> > We already have a way to persistenly change the seat assignment of a
> > dev
On Wed, 30.01.13 11:07, Vasily Kulikov (seg...@openwall.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> systemd uses plain NULL as an argument of variadic functions, which is a
> UB in C. (char*)NULL should be used instead. Plain NULL may be defined
> as "0" or smth.
>
> >From C99:
>
> "6.3.2.3 Pointers
>
> ...
>
>
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> We actually care about readability of the sources and non-Linux systems
> are out-of-focus for us. Can you tell me which Linux system has
> sizeof(void*) != sizeof(char*)? Otherwise, I only see this as pointless
> excercise of making our
[and the crowd goes wild!]
Thanks for this work. I've also had a few bug reports about this one.
'Twas brillig, and Michal Sekletar at 02/02/13 09:10 did gyre and gimble:
> thank you very much for the review, it is very appreciated. I've sent
> out the patch to get a feedback on a general approac
'Twas brillig, and Andrey Borzenkov at 02/02/13 19:39 did gyre and gimble:
> В Sat, 2 Feb 2013 15:24:44 +0100
> Sébastien Luttringer пишет:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Looking forward to mount custom partitions I decided to use unit.mount
>> files to define my new fs. Everything works perfectly, so I tried
On Feb 4, 2013 10:31 AM, "Lennart Poettering"
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 01.02.13 12:50, Jake Edge (j...@lwn.net) wrote:
>
> > [ OK, let's try this again ... since I'm impatient about it sitting in
> > the moderator queue, I went ahead and joined up ]
> >
> > Hi Lennart (and the rest of the systemd gang),
On Feb 4, 2013 1:36 PM, "Tom Gundersen" wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 4, 2013 10:31 AM, "Lennart Poettering"
wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 01.02.13 12:50, Jake Edge (j...@lwn.net) wrote:
> >
> > > [ OK, let's try this again ... since I'm impatient about it sitting in
> > > the moderator queue, I went ahead and jo
> Hi,
> can you check if it works with the following test case?
> For me it doesn't, and I think there must be a bug.
>
> Zbyszek
Hi Zbigniew,
sorry for a responding on my initial email, but for some reason your
response[1] did not appear in my mailbox. Anyway your test have raised
an interestin
.mount units coming from /proc/self/mountinfo file are
unmounted after local-fs.target is reached during shutdown.
Problem: .mount units popping up in mountinfo file are
added to systemd without any dependency. For that reason,
they are the first one to be unmounted during shutdown.
Whichever prog
Only set source for freshly created .mounts coming from
mountinfo file.
---
src/core/mount.c | 12 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/mount.c b/src/core/mount.c
index 29ce440..8231059 100644
--- a/src/core/mount.c
+++ b/src/core/mount.c
@@ -1440,
Downside of this patch is, mountinfo mounts stick around as inactive-dead
even when the file system they represent is unmounted.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Umut Tezduyar wrote:
> .mount units coming from /proc/self/mountinfo file are
> unmounted after local-fs.target is reached during shut
---
src/journal/coredump.c | 9 ++---
src/shared/logs-show.c | 18 +++---
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/coredump.c b/src/journal/coredump.c
index c989be9..91528d3 100644
--- a/src/journal/coredump.c
+++ b/src/journal/coredump.c
@@ -144
---
src/journal/coredump.c | 28 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/coredump.c b/src/journal/coredump.c
index 91528d3..4f79c45 100644
--- a/src/journal/coredump.c
+++ b/src/journal/coredump.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include "log.h"
Thanks again! I have completely missed this new feature of ssh.
On 2/3/13, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Igor Bukanov wrote:
>> On 29 January 2013 00:25, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>>> systemd only handles accepting connections, but does not copy any
>>> data – ssh's
I can't find a reason why we shouldn't try to output messages for other
unit types than .service, .socket, .mount and .swap as well. It's probably
a leftover from before we started logging UNIT= from inside PID 1.
---
src/shared/logs-show.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff -
Written by Peeters Simon . Makefile stuff
and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok .
---
Makefile.am| 21 +-
src/analyze/systemd-analyze.c | 575 +
src/analyze/systemd-analyze.in | 328 ---
3 files changed, 585 insertions(+)
Returning IPv6 link-local addresses is a bad idea, because they only
work if an application connects specifically over the corresponding
interface. So you get errors like:
$ curl -6 http://my-machine/
curl: (7) Failed to connect to fe80::d6be:d9ff:fe1b:8477: Invalid argument
To prevent this,
Nscd expects that an NSS module's gethostbyname4_r function returns
its first result in the pre-allocated gaih_addrtuple denoted by **pat.
(See nscd/aicache.c in the Glibc sources.) However, nss-myhostname
doesn't fill in **pat but allocates the first result in ‘buffer’, then
sets *pat. So nscd c
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:03:59PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar wrote:
> Downside of this patch is, mountinfo mounts stick around as inactive-dead
> even when the file system they represent is unmounted.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Umut Tezduyar wrote:
>
> > .mount units coming from /pro
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Eelco Dolstra
wrote:
> Returning IPv6 link-local addresses is a bad idea, because they only
> work if an application connects specifically over the corresponding
> interface. So you get errors like:
>
> $ curl -6 http://my-machine/
> curl: (7) Failed to connect
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:56:25PM +0100, Eelco Dolstra wrote:
> Returning IPv6 link-local addresses is a bad idea, because they only
> work if an application connects specifically over the corresponding
> interface.
Isn't this a responsibility of the application to deal with that?
> So you get er
Le lundi 04 février 2013 à 16:23 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:03:59PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar wrote:
> > Downside of this patch is, mountinfo mounts stick around as inactive-dead
> > even when the file system they represent is unmounted.
> >
> >
Hi,
On 04/02/13 16:36, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> In other words, the scope ID is filled in correctly when I request
> AF_UNSPEC, but it's empty for AF_INET6.
Hm, interesting. I see now that curl without -6 does connect correctly to the
link-local address, so the failure with -6 is probably cau
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:13:25PM +0100, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> ---
> src/journal/coredump.c | 28 ++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/journal/coredump.c b/src/journal/coredump.c
> index 91528d3..4f79c45 100644
> --- a/src/journal
On 04/02/13 05:13, David Strauss wrote:
I second the interest in committing this to the existing Python
support once polished.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
Hi,
I've been developing a python
On Mon, 04.02.13 11:37, Michał Bartoszkiewicz (mbartoszkiew...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > We actually care about readability of the sources and non-Linux systems
> > are out-of-focus for us. Can you tell me which Linux system has
> > si
'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 16/01/13 20:55 did
gyre and gimble:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:33:22PM +0100, Holger Winkelmann wrote:
>> Can't speak from person experience, but my team has worked with the libevent
>> and
>> libev libraries which contain http libraries as well.
On Wed, 30.01.13 17:02, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> i would propose here "InaccessibleDirectories=-/data/backups"
> the same way as for EnvFiles, this even works in context not failing
> to start the service BUT if the folder exists it's not locked
>
> HTTP 403:
> Inaccessible
Written by Peeters Simon . Makefile stuff
and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok .
---
Fixed some stuff and dit some more cleanup.
This should just cover the same usage as the old systemd-analyze, but we can
add more functionality afterwards (systemctl dot, other output formats,...)
This is the rebase
thanks,
I'm in the process of merging this - once I figure out why another
commit from a few days back breaks my compile :^)
Auke
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Simon Peeters wrote:
> Written by Peeters Simon . Makefile stuff
> and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok .
> ---
>
> Fixed some stuff an
On Thu, 31.01.13 21:38, Matthias Berndt (matthias_ber...@gmx.de) wrote:
> Hi,
heya,
> The attached version of the patch contains updates to the man pages.
I couldn't come up with any reason not to merge a patch like this, so
this should probably go in.
However, I'd like to ask for one change b
On Mon, 04.02.13 21:32, Simon Peeters (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Written by Peeters Simon . Makefile stuff
> and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok .
> ---
Hmm, how does this relate to this work:
https://bugzilla.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60112
Can we merge both approaches?
>
> Fixed
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
wrote:
> Hello
>
> During testing Arch Linux ISO under KVM (1.2.0) (using systemd 197),
> looks like when rename rules must be applied network interface is still
> busy.
>
> You can see on the journal, when things goes bad:
>
> Jan 31 16:27:5
On Thu, 31.01.13 22:59, David Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
> Before I spend time rolling a patch, what are the thoughts on renaming
> the "priority" arguments to something like "verbosity"? This change
> would not alter the function signature, only the naming and
> documentation. We wou
On Sat, 02.02.13 14:17, Arthur Taylor (a...@ified.ca) wrote:
> Hello systemd developers
>
> TL;DR: On a VT which X is running, messing with KDSKBMODE on
> underneath X at best has no affect and at worst breaks keyboard input
> badly. In the short term, systemd should stop calling this ioctl
> bec
2013/2/4 Lennart Poettering :
> On Mon, 04.02.13 21:32, Simon Peeters (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Written by Peeters Simon . Makefile stuff
>> and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok .
>> ---
>
> Hmm, how does this relate to this work:
>
> https://bugzilla.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60112
On Fri, 01.02.13 13:20, Umut Tezduyar (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
> As of 3cdebc217c42c8529086f2965319b6a48eaaeabe support for
> distro specific boot up runlevels has been dropped.
Thanks!
Applied!
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
___
sy
Am 04.02.2013 22:33, schrieb Peeters Simon:
> 2013/2/4 Lennart Poettering :
>> On Mon, 04.02.13 21:32, Simon Peeters (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Written by Peeters Simon . Makefile stuff
>>> and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok .
>>> ---
>>
>> Hmm, how does this relate to this work:
>>
>>
On 4 February 2013 22:33, Peeters Simon wrote:
> 2013/2/4 Lennart Poettering :
> > On Mon, 04.02.13 21:32, Simon Peeters (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> Written by Peeters Simon . Makefile stuff
> >> and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok .
> >> ---
> >
> > Hmm, how does this relate to this w
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Peeters Simon wrote:
> 2013/2/4 Lennart Poettering :
>> On Mon, 04.02.13 21:32, Simon Peeters (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Written by Peeters Simon . Makefile stuff
>>> and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok .
>>> ---
>>
>> Hmm, how does this relate to this wor
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.02.2013 22:33, schrieb Peeters Simon:
>> 2013/2/4 Lennart Poettering :
>>> On Mon, 04.02.13 21:32, Simon Peeters (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>>
Written by Peeters Simon . Makefile stuff
and cleaned up a bit by Auke Ko
Am 04.02.2013 22:47, schrieb Kok:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 04.02.2013 22:33, schrieb Peeters Simon:
>>> 2013/2/4 Lennart Poettering :
On Mon, 04.02.13 21:32, Simon Peeters (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Written by Peeters Simon . Makefi
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> Ok, here's a first patch that helps my build:
as of today I need this patch to make my compiles (source-based
distro) actully succeed, otherwise `systemd-cat` fails to CCLD:
/home/sofar/git/z/systemd/.libs/libudev.so: undefined reference to
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 01:54:56PM -0800, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Ok, here's a first patch that helps my build:
>
> as of today I need this patch to make my compiles (source-based
> distro) actully succeed, otherwise `systemd-cat` fails t
On 04/02/13 18:30, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 04/02/13 05:13, David Strauss wrote:
I second the interest in committing this to the existing Python
support once polished.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +, Steven Hiscocks
On Thu, 31.01.13 00:07, Dave (d...@flex.com.au) wrote:
> Hi. I'm not on the maillist, but I recently read that systemd was planning
> to introduce an integrated job scheduler, if it isn't done already.
>
> If so, then it would be very handy to introduce a way to run scheduled jobs
> at the end
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 01:54:56PM -0800, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> > Ok, here's a first patch that helps my build:
>>
>> as of today I need this patch to make my compiles
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:32:33PM +0100, Simon Peeters wrote:
> Written by Peeters Simon . Makefile stuff
> and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok .
> ---
>
> Fixed some stuff and dit some more cleanup.
>
> This should just cover the same usage as the old systemd-analyze, but we can
> add more functio
2013/2/5 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com>:
> Thanks! It applied cleanly. Just a comment in the analyze_plot fucntion.
> Previously I mentioned that really short boot times make plots that are
> too small to really read anything, and I kept getting graphs that were
> trunctated and short, basicall
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:47:05PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 31.01.13 00:07, Dave (d...@flex.com.au) wrote:
>
> > Hi. I'm not on the maillist, but I recently read that systemd was planning
> > to introduce an integrated job scheduler, if it isn't done already.
> >
> > If so, t
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Arthur Taylor wrote:
> KDSKBMODE is a virtual console ioctl which changes the current "mode"
> of the virtual console keyboard for that particular virtual terminal.
> That is, the virtual console keyboard mode, like the keymap, is a
> per-virtual terminal setting
2013/2/4 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:13:25PM +0100, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> > ---
> > src/journal/coredump.c | 28 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/journal/coredump.c b/src/journal/coredump.c
>
---
src/journal/coredump.c | 41 ++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/coredump.c b/src/journal/coredump.c
index 91528d3..021b4c6 100644
--- a/src/journal/coredump.c
+++ b/src/journal/coredump.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#i
On 4 Feb 2013, at 4:20 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> Suggestions what we could do instead?
>>
>> "2012-02-:4" maybe?
>>
>> "2012-02-~4"?
> This one looks nice.
What about "2012-02~4" (leave off the "-")? Thus, "-" implies day (days from
the start) of the month, "~" implies days fr
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 08:40:22PM +0200, Oleksii Shevchuk wrote:
>
> Current one:
> - If StopWhenUnneeded=yes and RequiredBy=, WantedBy=, BoundBy= empty
>Then stop unit.
> The side effect is:
> - If user starts unit, that not wanted by any started target, then unit
>will be immediately
In the year 2013, of the month of February, on the 4th day, Larry Baker wrote:
> What about "2012-02~4" (leave off the "-")? Thus, "-" implies day (days
> from the start) of the month, "~" implies days from the end of the month.
Nice. I like this one. Simple, neat, and feels right. The tilde
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:58:30AM +, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> [and the crowd goes wild!]
>
> Thanks for this work. I've also had a few bug reports about this one.
>
> 'Twas brillig, and Michal Sekletar at 02/02/13 09:10 did gyre and gimble:
> > thank you very much for the review, it is very ap
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Dave wrote:
> In the year 2013, of the month of February, on the 4th day, Larry Baker
> wrote:
> > What about "2012-02~4" (leave off the "-")? Thus, "-" implies day (days
> > from the start) of the month, "~" implies days from the end of the month.
>
> Nice. I
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
> I've made the suggested changes and pushed it to github. Feedback
> welcomed :)
Thanks!
Some more thoughts on the API below. Some of those are probably
stupid, but I want to throw them out in the open, for your feedback.
SD_M
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:21:27PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> Using -Wl,--gc-sections helps a lot, but still. We could just put it in
> a private path like /usr/lib/systemd/libsystemd-shared.so.
I have been wanting to do something like that for a long while.
I thought it would be much more co
65 matches
Mail list logo
