'Twas brillig, and abhishek sharma at 30/09/13 05:16 did gyre and gimble:
> Is there any service in the existing standard distribution, where I can
> get hands on these parameters ExecStartPre, ExecStart, ExecStartPost,
> ExecReload, ExecStop, ExecStop, ExecMainCode, signal result and
> ExecMainSta
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:18:52PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> El 29/09/13 15:11, Lennart Poettering escribió:
> > On Fri, 27.09.13 23:04, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
> >> wrote:
> >>> Distributions such as openSUSE and pr
Greetings all,
I have been trying to convert a LSB initscript of a package into
corresponding systemd service file. Most init scripts are simple and
translating them into systemd unit files is non-trivial. In this case it
is a relatively long script involving some loops.
1) Should I write a
Hi Muhammad,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Muhammad Shakeel
wrote:
> I have been trying to convert a LSB initscript of a package into
> corresponding systemd service fyile. Most init scripts are simple and
> translating them into systemd unit files is non-trivial. In this case it is
> a relati
Am 29.09.2013 22:06, schrieb Florian Klink:
> Am 29.09.2013 21:59, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>> On Sat, 28.09.13 16:35, Florian Klink (flo...@flokli.de) wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I setup some freshly-bootstrapped Arch Linux containers using systemd
>>> 204 (so only systemd inside, no old init sys
Am 30.09.2013 15:31, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Muhammad Shakeel
> wrote:
>> I have been trying to convert a LSB initscript of a package into
>> corresponding systemd service fyile. Most init scripts are simple and
>> translating them into systemd unit files is non-
Hi,
Just trying to debug the problem mentioned in the subject. I'm wanting
to use the new device names in stage 2 of our installer (some closing
config routines write the interface name into some conf files etc), but
when udev rules kick in, the device is already up and in use... is there
any way
Am 30.09.2013 17:14, schrieb Colin Guthrie:
> Hi,
>
> Just trying to debug the problem mentioned in the subject. I'm wanting
> to use the new device names in stage 2 of our installer (some closing
> config routines write the interface name into some conf files etc), but
> when udev rules kick in,
'Twas brillig, and Thomas Bächler at 30/09/13 16:42 did gyre and gimble:
> Am 30.09.2013 17:14, schrieb Colin Guthrie:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just trying to debug the problem mentioned in the subject. I'm wanting
>> to use the new device names in stage 2 of our installer (some closing
>> config routines writ
Heya!
We are looking into organizing another systemd Hackfest early next year,
either co-located with FOSDEM 2014 in Brussels (Feb. 1+2) or with
devconf.cz 2014 in Brno (Feb 7-9).
Now, we have the suspcicion that more people might be willing to attend
if we host it at FOSDEM, but it would be easi
It appears that history repeats itself.
Once (July 2013) a similar issue was reported here, by different user:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-July/012283.html
I'm also using Arch Linux, systemd-207, linux-3.11.2.
On shutdown and reboot, user@0.service occasionally freez
Heya!
We had been missing useful documentation on the new cgroup APIs that are
supposed to replace the direct cgroupfs access of old. I closed that gap now:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/ControlGroupInterface/
It's terse but should be fairly comprehensive. Light on examples
un
В Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:55:14 +0300
Toms Seisums пишет:
> It appears that history repeats itself.
>
> Once (July 2013) a similar issue was reported here, by different user:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-July/012283.html
>
> I'm also using Arch Linux, systemd-207, linu
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> Le mercredi 25 septembre 2013 à 12:10 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On a relatively average journal it can take a long time to page
>> through all the data collected.
>>
>> With data stored from 5th August to 25th Sept
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:52:32PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> We are looking into organizing another systemd Hackfest early next year,
> either co-located with FOSDEM 2014 in Brussels (Feb. 1+2) or with
> devconf.cz 2014 in Brno (Feb 7-9).
>
> Now, we have the suspcicion that more people m
On Monday 2013-09-30 17:52, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>We are looking into organizing another systemd Hackfest early next year,
>either co-located with FOSDEM 2014 in Brussels (Feb. 1+2) or with
>devconf.cz 2014 in Brno (Feb 7-9).
>
>Now, we have the suspcicion that more people might be willing
I would strongly prefer Brussels for travel reasons.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
2013/9/30 Lennart Poettering :>
> We are looking into organizing another systemd Hackfest early next year,
> either co-located with FOSDEM 2014 in Brussels (Feb. 1+2) or with
> devconf.cz 2014 in Brno (Feb 7-9).
>
> Now, we have the suspcicion that more people might be willing to attend
> if we hos
On Mon, 30.09.13 16:14, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just trying to debug the problem mentioned in the subject. I'm wanting
> to use the new device names in stage 2 of our installer (some closing
> config routines write the interface name into some conf files etc), but
>
On Mon, 30.09.13 17:42, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote:
> Any application that listens on netlink for new network interfaces may
> start using the interface before udev has finished processing the uevent.
>
> IMO, this needs to be fixed in the kernel and udev, so that udev can
> have
The correct path to the dir with CIPSO mappings is /etc/smack/cipso.d/;
/etc/smack/cipso is a file that can include these mappings as well,
though it is no longer supported in upstream libsmack.
---
src/core/smack-setup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/core
On Mon, 30.09.13 18:55, Toms Seisums (toms.seis...@gmail.com) wrote:
> It appears that history repeats itself.
>
> Once (July 2013) a similar issue was reported here, by different user:
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-July/012283.html
>
> I'm also using Arch Linux, sys
On Mon, 30.09.13 17:43, Patrick McCarty (patrick.mcca...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> The correct path to the dir with CIPSO mappings is /etc/smack/cipso.d/;
> /etc/smack/cipso is a file that can include these mappings as well,
> though it is no longer supported in upstream libsmack.
Thanks!
Applie
On Mon, 30.09.13 00:32, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote:
> diff --git a/src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c
> b/src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c
> index 9efccb9..6cecb4e 100644
> --- a/src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c
> +++ b/src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c
> @@ -449
On Mon, 30.09.13 01:34, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote:
I'd love to get rid of FsckPassNo=, but I fear that's not that
easy... After all it's not just a boolean, it actually influences the
ordering of the fsck. There traditionally were two documented phases
which you could use to seri
On Sat, 28.09.13 00:22, Paul D. DeRocco (pdero...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> I'm working with a Gumstix, and I want to run an "ifup" command when the
> WiFi device becomes available. I'm not sure why, but it always seems to
> become available after the boot process is complete, so I can't use a
> reg
On Sun, 29.09.13 23:18, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
> El 29/09/13 15:11, Lennart Poettering escribió:
> > On Fri, 27.09.13 23:04, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
> >> wrote:
> >>> Distributions such as openS
On Mon, 30.09.13 08:44, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote:
> > > I agree. We can't test this anyway anymore. I'd be happy to merge a
> > > patch that removes any Upstart compat support.
> > >
> > > Lennart
> > >
> >
> > OK, here we go...patch attached..
> >
>
> What about removing the
On Fri, 27.09.13 11:43, Arthur Taylor (a...@ified.ca) wrote:
>
> This is an old thread from February. Sorry I can't reply to the original
> email.
>
> Apparently I failed to notice this question. My bad.
>
> >> Hello systemd developers
> >>
> >> TL;DR: On a VT which X is running, messing with
On Fri, 27.09.13 11:37, Umut Tezduyar (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed that ExecStop is not being run on following service
> with following requests:
>
> [Service]
> Type=oneshot
> RemainAfterExit=yes
> ExecStart=/bin/sh -c "sleep 20 && /usr/bin/systemd-cat echo ExecStart.."
>
On Mon, 30.09.13 12:48, Jason St. John (jstj...@purdue.edu) wrote:
> I've been seeing similar performance issues with the journal for
> several recent versions of systemd (at least from v204 through v207 on
> Arch Linux). I have journal logs from 2012-10-20 through today that
> contain 1,268,128 l
On Wed, 25.09.13 01:11, Tim Landscheidt (t...@tim-landscheidt.de) wrote:
> On "mount /mnt/test", however, "systemctl status
> mnt-test.mount mount-wrapper" shows the latter service being
> "inactive (dead)", while the former is "active (mounted)".
>
> How can I (or can I not?) set up a dependency
On Tue, 24.09.13 13:53, Kelly Anderson (ke...@xilka.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the intent way back in the early stages of systemd was
> to
> eliminate /etc/fstab and use .mount files exclusively. Since it was never
> fully implemented I took the prerogative to make it work
On Mon, 23.09.13 21:01, Evan Callicoat (a...@propter.net) wrote:
Thanks!
Applied!
> With the advent of systemd --user sessions, it's become very interesting to
> spawn X as a user unit, as well as accompanying processes that may have
> previously been in a .xinitrc/.xsession, or even just to r
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 30.09.13 01:34, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote:
>
> I'd love to get rid of FsckPassNo=, but I fear that's not that
> easy... After all it's not just a boolean, it actually influences the
> ordering of the fsck. There
On Mon, 23.09.13 10:33, The Lee-Man (leeman.dun...@gmail.com) wrote:
> After=network.target NetworkManager-wait-online.service tgtd.service
> targetcli.service
Please use network-online.target here instead of
NetworkManager-wait-online.service.
Please see the discussion of this unit on:
http:/
On Tue, 01.10.13 04:19, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
> > I'd love to get rid of FsckPassNo=, but I fear that's not that
> > easy... After all it's not just a boolean, it actually influences the
> > ordering of the fsck. There traditionally were two documented phases
> > which you could use
On Thu, 26.09.13 09:41, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I'm still observing timeouts stopping user@0.service on shutdown. It
> appears to be some race condition, because enabling debugging of either
> main systemd or user systemd, or even changing console from vt to
> serial would
On Sun, 22.09.13 21:10, cee1 (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Let read()/write() report any error/EOF.
> ---
> src/shared/util.c | 12
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/shared/util.c b/src/shared/util.c
> index 2009553..3c08650 100644
> --- a/src/sha
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 01.10.13 04:19, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>
>> > I'd love to get rid of FsckPassNo=, but I fear that's not that
>> > easy... After all it's not just a boolean, it actually influences the
>> > ordering of the fsck. There
On Fri, 13.09.13 08:38, cee1 (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2013/9/12 Lennart Poettering :
> > On Thu, 12.09.13 09:43, cee1 (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> What about the following patch? It simply do read/write again if poll
> >> returns, and let read/write report error if something is wrong.
>
On Fri, 20.09.13 22:53, Olivier Brunel (j...@jjacky.com) wrote:
> Since 41efeaec a call to service_unwatch_main_pid() is done from
> service_set_main_pid(), which is called upon receiving message MAINPID=
>
> This had the side effect of not watching pid anymore, and would result in a
> useless ti
On Tue, 01.10.13 04:42, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 01.10.13 04:19, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
> >
> >> > I'd love to get rid of FsckPassNo=, but I fear that's not that
> >> > easy... After all it's not j
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> units/u...@.service.in |1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> New commits:
> commit e6dca814412f17db05910acedf76d36d3b7f1355
> Author: Evan Callicoat
> Date: Mon Sep 23 21:01:04 2013 -0500
>
> units: Add SHELL environment
On Tuesday 2013-10-01 04:29, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> >
>> > b) declare that manual passno configuration is stupid beyond treating it
>> >as simple boolean. In thatc ase we should drop all references of
>> >passno in the sources. Of course people might complain that we break
>> >co
45 matches
Mail list logo
