Thanks to all (the initial patch had ended up in my spam, no idea why).
Tom
On 27 Nov 2014 06:33, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 03:51:31PM -0800, Gavin Li wrote:
> > From: Gavin Li
> >
> > For IPv6, the kernel returns EINVAL if a route is added with the
> > RTA_
Hi list,
This will be about recently added Delegate option. I think that it doesn't work
as intended. I'll describe simple scenario which exhibits the problem.
Start qemu-kvm virtual machine via libvirt. libvirt will register vm with
machined which in turn creates scope unit for vm and starts del
Hi,
Yes, you are right. My service is defined as simple. And I changed it
to notify, seems that I can make the other services now successfully start
after it finished startup. But I'm confused who will call "sd_notify" to send
"READY=1"? I can't find the related code in system. Or the
On Thu, 27.11.14 15:19, Peter Hutterer (peter.hutte...@who-t.net) wrote:
> Currently a property in the form of
> FOO=bar
> is stored as " FOO=bar", i.e. the property name contains a leading space.
> That's quite hard to spot.
>
> This patch discards all extra whitespaces but the first one which
Hi
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:10:10AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:01:30AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:30:51AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
[snip]
>> >
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Cao, XinX wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, you are right. My service is defined as simple. And I changed
> it to notify, seems that I can make the other services now successfully
> start after it finished startup. But I'm confused who will call "sd_notify"
> to sen
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to start a unit on system shutdown and reboot, but do so
> immediately after the "systemctl reboot" command is executed, before any
> other units are terminated.
>
Out of curiosity, what does your unit do? Is there a sp
But it’s very strange, for I can’t find “sd_notify” or
“sd_notifyf” in my program, but seems that notify type can still work. So are
there any other functions able to do this ?
Thanks~~
From: Mantas Mikulėnas [mailto:graw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 27,
Am 26.11.2014 um 22:29 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> Hi!
>
> I run a Linux container setup with openSUSE 13.1/2 as guest distro.
> After some time containers slow down.
> An investigation showed that the containers slow down because a lot of stale
> user sessions slow down almost all systemd tools
Hi,
We got the following error when running systemd on a device with many ports:
"rtnl: kernel receive buffer overrun
Event source 'rtnl-receive-message' returned error, disabling: No buffer space
available"
I think the kernel socket receive buffer queue should be increased. The default
value
Hi
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:33:31PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Wed, 26.11.14 15:16, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> (gustavo.barbi...@intel.com) wrote:
>>
>> > I'm okay with the change to remove gc-sections.
>> >
>> > s
В Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:44:50 +
"Cao, XinX" пишет:
> But it’s very strange, for I can’t find “sd_notify” or
> “sd_notifyf” in my program, but seems that notify type can still work. So are
> there any other functions able to do this ?
Sorry, I do not understand this. Could you
Hi
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Stanisław Pitucha wrote:
> TXT records should have at least one character, so enforce this.
> Previously parser SIGSEGV'd on ->txt.strings being NULL.
Your patch fixes the issue, indeed. However, I didn't have the time to
look this up in the DNS RFC. I'm not r
On 11/27/2014 03:42 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:35:30AM -0800, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>> src/core/job.c |7 +--
>> src/core/job.h | 14 ++
>> src/core/transaction.c |2 +-
>> test/TEST-03-JOBS/
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 09:59:12PM +, Moyer, Keith wrote:
> Running v215-6 via Debian jessie
>
> In my situation, it is common to have unclean reboots. On the subsequent
> boot, a system@journal~ file is created. The problem is that these
> journal~ files do not trigger any cleanup wit
On Thursday 27 November 2014 15:42:37 David Herrmann wrote:
> We _really_ depend on --gc-sections. We link a lot of stuff from
> src/shared/ statically into all binaries and expect the linker to drop
> any unused symbols. Note that none of the symbols from src/shared/ are
> exported, so the linker
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:44:50PM +, Cao, XinX wrote:
> But it’s very strange, for I can’t find “sd_notify” or
> “sd_notifyf” in my program, but seems that notify type can still work. So are
> there any other functions able to do this ? > Thanks~~
Are you su
Hi
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Stanisław Pitucha wrote:
> Loops in RR compression were only detected for the first entry.
> Multiple redirections should be allowed, each one checking for an
> infinite loop on its own starting point.
> Also update the pointer on each redirection to avoid long
Hi
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Stanisław Pitucha wrote:
> Set the error code in case of incorrect name. This prevents continuing
> and failing an assert(name) later on.
> ---
> src/resolve/resolved-dns-packet.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Looks good, applied!
В Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:17:49 +0200
Mantas Mikulėnas пишет:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to start a unit on system shutdown and reboot, but do so
> > immediately after the "systemctl reboot" command is executed, before any
> > other units
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 03:42:37PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:33:31PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> On Wed, 26.11.14 15:16, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> >> (gustavo.barbi...@intel.co
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I run a Linux container setup with openSUSE 13.1/2 as guest distro.
> After some time containers slow down.
> An investigation showed that the containers slow down because a lot of stale
> user sessions slow down almost all
Hi
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 03:42:37PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 06:33:31PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> >> On
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:12:20PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Stanisław Pitucha wrote:
> > TXT records should have at least one character, so enforce this.
> > Previously parser SIGSEGV'd on ->txt.strings being NULL.
>
> Your patch fixes the issue, ind
Hi
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:12:20PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Stanisław Pitucha
>> wrote:
>> > TXT records should have at least one character, so enforce this.
>> > Previously
On Thursday 27 November 2014 13:42:27 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> I'm asking because from Peter Wu's email we're 26384 - 26380 = 4Kb
> heavier in the whole installed set of binaries. If this is correct I
> doubt the gc-sections is making any difference in the linkage of
> static libraries (sr
Hi
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Peter Wu wrote:
> On Thursday 27 November 2014 13:42:27 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> I'm asking because from Peter Wu's email we're 26384 - 26380 = 4Kb
>> heavier in the whole installed set of binaries. If this is correct I
>> doubt the gc-sections is mak
Hi Alin,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Rauta, Alin wrote:
> We got the following error when running systemd on a device with many
> ports:
>
>
>
> "rtnl: kernel receive buffer overrun
> Event source 'rtnl-receive-message' returned error, disabling: No buffer
> space available"
>
> I think t
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 06:50:19PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Peter Wu wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 November 2014 13:42:27 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >> I'm asking because from Peter Wu's email we're 26384 - 26380 = 4Kb
> >> heavier in the whole inst
Hi
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> Currently configure.ac has the LTO logic inside an:
>
> AS_CASE([$CFLAGS], [*-O[[12345\ ]]*],
>
> We can make the "else" block check/enable for gc-sections alongside
> printing the result. See the attached (unteste
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:36:12PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
> > Currently configure.ac has the LTO logic inside an:
> >
> > AS_CASE([$CFLAGS], [*-O[[12345\ ]]*],
> >
> > We can make the "else" block check/
Mantas Mikulėnas writes:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to start a unit on system shutdown and reboot, but do so
>> immediately after the "systemctl reboot" command is executed, before any
>> other units are terminated.
>
> Out of curiosity, wh
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I run a Linux container setup with openSUSE 13.1/2 as guest distro.
> After some time containers slow down.
> An investigation showed that the containers slow down because a lot of stale
> user sessions slow down almost all syste
Mantas Mikulėnas writes:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to start a unit on system shutdown and reboot, but do so
>> immediately after the "systemctl reboot" command is executed, before any
>> other units are terminated.
>
>> Is there a way to d
Am 26.11.2014 um 21:52 schrieb Tom Gundersen:
This sort of scheme (mounting partitions with extra config files after
the daemons have started) is not really something we support. We would
rather recommend you mount everything you need for your base system
(i.e., all of /etc and /usr, but not ne
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:39:08PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:10:10AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:01:30AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >> wrote
Hello all,
Cameron Norman [2014-11-27 12:26 -0800]:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I run a Linux container setup with openSUSE 13.1/2 as guest distro.
> > After some time containers slow down.
> > An investigation showed that the containers slow down
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:13:00PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:12:20PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Stanisław Pitucha
> >> wrote:
> >
Hi, All
I happen to notice systemctl isolate will expands "foo.service" to
"foo.service.target", which unfortunately breaks my boot in some way.
I find the following commit:
commit 0807312
Author: Lennart Poettering
Date: Mon Oct 13 15:43:09 2014 +0200
systemctl: when mangle unit names f
В Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:11:29 +0800
WANG Chao пишет:
> Hi, All
>
> I happen to notice systemctl isolate will expands "foo.service" to
> "foo.service.target", which unfortunately breaks my boot in some way.
>
> I find the following commit:
>
> commit 0807312
> Author: Lennart Poettering
> Date:
On 11/28/14 at 10:13am, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:11:29 +0800
> WANG Chao пишет:
>
> > Hi, All
> >
> > I happen to notice systemctl isolate will expands "foo.service" to
> > "foo.service.target", which unfortunately breaks my boot in some way.
> >
> > I find the following
Hello, since a while back, there was a commit (haven't found it) which
limits the number of children/workers to 8 + * 2, which in a
normal case like a 4 core/cpu machine is 16 children/workers.
This limit is way too low even for a single core VM, that actually
means 10 children/workers.
I've att
42 matches
Mail list logo
