Hi,
No general counter-arguments here, but I would like to strongly suggest
that support for this has to be explicitly enabled in the services unit,
preferably with required configuration of an upper bound. E.g.
[Service]
(...)
WatchdogSec=2s
WatchdogSecAllowChange=true
Hello,
Am Montag, 23. Mai 2016, 11:43:13 CEST schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Sun, 22.05.16 16:18, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > I can add my usecase as another reason ;-)
> >
> > I'm talking about AppArmor, where "stop" means unloading the
> > profiles
> > from the kernel. The result is that all
Hello,
Am Montag, 23. Mai 2016, 11:24:06 CEST schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Fri, 20.05.16 21:50, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > it looks like
> >
> > systemctl restart foo
> >
> > is internally mapped to a sequence of
> >
> > systemctl stop foo; systemctl start foo
> >
> >
On 05/23/2016 11:59 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 23.05.16 11:34, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 05/20/2016 04:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
If such systems require specialized unit files, then you can put
ldconfig.service there, instead of exposing all systemd
2016-05-24 오전 4:23에 David R. Piegdon 이(가) 쓴 글:
Hi,
No general counter-arguments here, but I would like to strongly suggest
that support for this has to be explicitly enabled in the services unit,
preferably with required configuration of an upper bound. E.g.
[Service]
(...)
WatchdogSec=2s
Am 23.05.2016 um 23:33 schrieb Michael Biebl:
2016-05-23 22:52 GMT+02:00 Christian Boltz :
I'd argue that nobody will complain if "systemctl restart apparmor" does
something sane (reloading the profiles) instead of making the system
insecure by removing the
On 05/23/2016 06:07 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 20.05.16 20:10, Mike Gulick (mike.gul...@mathworks.com) wrote:
Hi systemd-devel,
I'm on Debian Jessie running the default systemd-215. I have a
daemon (running as root, controlled by systemd), whose job it is to
launch on-demand VNC
2016-05-23 22:52 GMT+02:00 Christian Boltz :
> I'd argue that nobody will complain if "systemctl restart apparmor" does
> something sane (reloading the profiles) instead of making the system
> insecure by removing the confinement from all running processes ;-)
So, you
Am 23.05.2016 um 10:00 schrieb Ashish Sangwan:
My second issue is, on failure of stopping/umounting, no failure
message appears on console although I have used StandardError option
sadly systemd don't print service outputs to console
even something like "systemd-run -t
On Mon, 23.05.16 13:30, Ashish Sangwan (ashishsangw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> The first issue is, once the command mentioned in ExecStop failed due
> to mountpoint busy, the user comes out of the mountpoint, making it
> un-busy and again fires the systemctl stop command, however the status
> of the
On Mon, 23.05.16 10:32, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.05.2016 um 10:00 schrieb Ashish Sangwan:
> >My second issue is, on failure of stopping/umounting, no failure
> >message appears on console although I have used StandardError option
>
> sadly systemd don't print
On Mon, 23.05.16 10:56, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> in a shell it works fine
Hmm, that's strange...
> but i talk about cronjobs like "8,38 * * * * root
> /usr/local/bin/spamfilter-fetch-samples" where the shell-script invokes
> systemd-run which finally calls a php-script
On Fri, 20.05.16 21:50, Christian Boltz (systemd-de...@cboltz.de) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it looks like
> systemctl restart foo
> is internally mapped to a sequence of
> systemctl stop foo; systemctl start foo
>
> Unfortunately, this behaviour causes quite some trouble for me.
>
> I need a
On Sat, 21.05.16 10:31, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> I need a way to know if "restart "or "stop" was used because the mapping
> >> to stop / start gives my service a completely different behaviour than
> >> expected on restart.
> >>
> >> Is there a way to find out if "stop"
On Sun, 22.05.16 23:19, Christian Boltz (systemd-de...@cboltz.de) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Sonntag, 22. Mai 2016, 21:48:02 CEST schrieb Reindl Harald:
> > Am 22.05.2016 um 21:03 schrieb Christian Boltz:
> > > I'm already using ExecReload= to reload the profiles (works fine),
> > > and hope all
On Mon, 23.05.16 11:06, 김민경/주임연구원/SW Platform(연)AOT팀(minkyung88@lge.com)
(minkyung88@lge.com) wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Below is usecase from our SW-Engineer.
>
> What do you think so?
OK, makes sense.
As mentioned, I#d suggest implementing this via a new parameter to
sd_notify() that
On Sun, 22.05.16 15:24, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 19.05.2016 11:57, Martin Pitt пишет:
> > Hello Bao,
> >
> > Bao Nguyen [2016-05-19 15:52 +0700]:
> >> When the system is shutdown, systemd will terminate all services in
> >> parallel manner, could you let me know if there
On Sat, 21.05.16 21:43, Jamie Kitson (ja...@kitten-x.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if I power off my computer at the dm-crypt boot password prompt my UEFI
> menu entries get wiped from the BIOS and reset to the single default
> Windows option.
>
> This is with an Asus UX32VD laptop, Grub UEFI and
Am 23.05.2016 um 10:50 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Mon, 23.05.16 10:32, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
even something like "systemd-run -t --service-type=oneshot --quiet" behaves
differently and don't work if you call it via crond to get the typical
behavior of cronjobs
We have a user space file system implementation.
Lets say the binary name is user_fs
Execution/Mounting is done by using "systemctl start user_fs.service"
and stop/umounting is done by using "systemctl stop user_fs.service"
The service file looks like following:
[Service]
KillMode=none
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 01:33:57AM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:51:13PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > systemd v230 has been tagged. Enjoy!
> >
> > CHANGES WITH 230:
>
> Hi,
>
> One important change missing from this list is 7163e1ca1108d7
On Mon, 23.05.16 13:11, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 21.05.16 10:31, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> >> I need a way to know if "restart "or "stop" was used
On Mon, 23.05.16 12:12, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> Am 23.05.2016 um 11:59 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> >On Mon, 23.05.16 11:34, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >>I think the trigger is just implemented incorrectly. It should keep track
> >>of UUIDs in files
On Mon, 23.05.16 11:34, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On 05/20/2016 04:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> >>If such systems require specialized unit files, then you can put
> >>ldconfig.service there, instead of exposing all systemd users to the
> >>service.
> >
> >No they
Am 23.05.2016 um 11:59 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Mon, 23.05.16 11:34, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
I think the trigger is just implemented incorrectly. It should keep track
of UUIDs in files (such as /usr/.change-uuid), rather than looking at
mtimes. Then you can just
Hello,
I'm trying to make a small Python script which send an email when a
*Type=oneshot
*service ends (either in success or in failure).
To do that, I'm using the dbus binding for Python, and connecting to the
*PropertiesChanged* signal on the unit I'm monitoring.
It works great when the
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sat, 21.05.16 10:31, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> >> I need a way to know if "restart "or "stop" was used because the mapping
>> >> to stop / start gives my service a completely
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 23.05.16 13:30, Ashish Sangwan (ashishsangw...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> The first issue is, once the command mentioned in ExecStop failed due
>> to mountpoint busy, the user comes out of the mountpoint,
On Mon, 23.05.16 18:16, Ashish Sangwan (ashishsangw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 23.05.16 13:30, Ashish Sangwan (ashishsangw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> The first issue is, once the command mentioned in
29 matches
Mail list logo