I think *Mantas Mikule.nas* fixed it some minutes ago:/
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-December/007766.html
/
Am 17.12.2012 21:33, schrieb Christian Hesse:
Federico Di Pierro on Mon, 2012/12/17 21:19:
Hi!
I'm using systemd 196 on my archlinux, with linux 3.7.0 .
I fou
Christian Hesse on Mon, 2012/12/17 21:33:
> Federico Di Pierro on Mon, 2012/12/17 21:19:
> > Hi!
> > I'm using systemd 196 on my archlinux, with linux 3.7.0 .
> > I found out that "systemctl hybrid-sleep" needs to be ran as root. While
> > my session is active (using systemd-logind feature), and
Federico Di Pierro on Mon, 2012/12/17 21:19:
> Hi!
> I'm using systemd 196 on my archlinux, with linux 3.7.0 .
> I found out that "systemctl hybrid-sleep" needs to be ran as root. While my
> session is active (using systemd-logind feature), and in fact i can
> hibernate/poweroff/suspend with my no
---
src/login/org.freedesktop.login1.conf | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/login/org.freedesktop.login1.conf
b/src/login/org.freedesktop.login1.conf
index 5860fd9..6c1f2f5 100644
--- a/src/login/org.freedesktop.login1.conf
+++ b/src/login/org.freedesktop.login1.conf
Hi!
I'm using systemd 196 on my archlinux, with linux 3.7.0 .
I found out that "systemctl hybrid-sleep" needs to be ran as root. While my
session is active (using systemd-logind feature), and in fact i can
hibernate/poweroff/suspend with my normal user. But hybrid-sleep still
requires superuser pri
Hello,
I'm testing some of the security measures described in this post [1], and I'm
having problems with the DeviceAllow directive.
If I get it right, if I allow one access, all the remaining devices are
disallowed. But my tests show otherwise. The man page doesn't talk about this
behavior.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 17 dec. 2012, om 12:17 heeft Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> het volgende geschreven:
>> eudev has made a project annoucement [1], and I thought it would be
>> worthwhile to go through their patches and cherry-pick. I've now done
>> that (unt
Op 17 dec. 2012, om 12:17 heeft Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
het volgende geschreven:
> Hi,
>
> eudev has made a project annoucement [1], and I thought it would be
> worthwhile to go through their patches and cherry-pick. I've now done
> that (until cc5c144a70fc37e 'Merge pull request #32') and
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Dec 17, 2012 12:17 PM, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
>> wrote:
>> > There's also nice patch bfc850 'Add fallback path when accept4() is
>> > not available.' D
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:34:22PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2012 12:17 PM, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
> wrote:
> > There's also nice patch bfc850 'Add fallback path when accept4() is
> > not available.' Do we care about kernels < 2.6.28? (This version is
> > according to man acc
On Dec 17, 2012 6:17 AM, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> eudev has made a project annoucement [1], and I thought it would be
> worthwhile to go through their patches and cherry-pick. I've now done
> that (until cc5c144a70fc37e 'Merge pull request #32') and the results
> regarding
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:16:55AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:23:23PM +, Sami Kerola wrote:
> > Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57206
>
> > diff --git a/src/gudev/gudevclient.h b/src/gudev/gudevclient.h
> > index b425d03..23bfce6 100644
> >
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:23:23PM +, Sami Kerola wrote:
> Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57206
> diff --git a/src/gudev/gudevclient.h b/src/gudev/gudevclient.h
> index b425d03..23bfce6 100644
> --- a/src/gudev/gudevclient.h
> +++ b/src/gudev/gudevclient.h
> @@ -3,19 +3,18 @
Hi,
eudev has made a project annoucement [1], and I thought it would be
worthwhile to go through their patches and cherry-pick. I've now done
that (until cc5c144a70fc37e 'Merge pull request #32') and the results
regarding patches which can be used directly are not very impressive:
one patch to fix
On 10/15/2012 10:24 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 15.10.12 21:05, Sami Kerola (kerol...@iki.fi) wrote:
Found with 'cppcheck --enable=all --inconclusive --std=posix' while
working with util-linux, which has a copy of this file.
[snip]
@@ -358,10 +358,10 @@ _sd_export_ int sd_is_socket
On 12/13/2012 02:59 PM, Michal Sekletar wrote:
---
src/shared/socket-util.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/shared/socket-util.c b/src/shared/socket-util.c
index 49ea758..42ea545 100644
--- a/src/shared/socket-util.c
+++ b/src/shared/socket-util.c
@@ -369,6 +369,8 @@
On 12/17/2012 09:15 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:23:23PM +, Sami Kerola wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57206
15 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
Could you modify TODO also?
#v+
* need to update LGPL2.1 text to newest ve
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:23:23PM +, Sami Kerola wrote:
> Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57206
> 15 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
Could you modify TODO also?
#v+
* need to update LGPL2.1 text to newest version (with updated FSF address)
#v-
--
Tom
18 matches
Mail list logo
