What do you think about the following transformations:
[FDBEntry] = [FDBNeigh]
FDBControlled= FDBCleanTable
VLAN = VLANId
?
When FDBCleanTable is set to yes, networkd will clean the existing FDB entries
for current port and FDBCleanTable will have
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 11.12.14 23:01, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Trying to build 218 but I am getting undefined reference error. The
source code of bus-error.c mentions that gcc magically maps these
In case someone has an idea, here is the full linker command:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link
mipsisa32r2el-axis-linux-gnu-gcc -isystem
/build/target/mipsisa32r2el-axis-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/build/target/mipsisa32r2el-axis-linux-gnu/usr/include -std=gnu99
-pipe -Wall -Wextra
Bump libblkid requirement from 2.20 to 2.24.
util-linux 2.25 is actually required since
fdbbad981cc5da8bb4ed7e9b6646e7a114745ec5
---
configure.ac | 2 +-
src/udev/udev-builtin-blkid.c | 13 -
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Adam Papai wrote on 11/12/14 09:17:
Why and what is removing my files from the target directories? Those are
required to run the lxc-container properly otherwise it'll boot up in a
dergaded state, without ssh and iptables forwarding and so on.
What did I miss? Is it something change between
Hi,
Colin Guthrie:
What's the argument for including /usr/local in all this stuff? Feels
wrong to me.
+ME_TOO. /usr/local frequently has wider permissions than reasonable for
something that can affect system startup.
I can think of one argument in favor of this -- you can modify the system
On 12/12/2014 02:57 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Colin Guthrie:
What's the argument for including /usr/local in all this stuff? Feels
wrong to me.
+ME_TOO. /usr/local frequently has wider permissions than reasonable for
something that can affect system startup.
I can think of one
hi,
Our / partitions are on a squashfs media, which means that unit files
are read-only. There is a partition for read-write content
(Scratchable), and I'm wondering if it would be possible to add
unit-files there and have the boot order cope with this correctly?
How should this be set up
Hi,
Today I had one unit in failed state, and after taking care of things I
wanted to simply reset its state (to inactive) w/out having to start it.
Looking up the man page, I see there's a command reset-failed for this
exact purpose, awesome. So I go:
% systemctl reset-failed backups2.service
On Fri, 12.12.14 09:07, Rauta, Alin (alin.ra...@intel.com) wrote:
What do you think about the following transformations:
[FDBEntry] = [FDBNeigh]
We try to avoid acronyms and abbreviations unless they are very widely
established. Hence I am not convinced Neigh is something we
On 12/12/2014 03:07 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Given that fdb and entry are commonly used I think [FDBEntry]
would be fine.
It exist there in the first place makes it an entry so what's wrong
with just calling this entry [FDB]?
JBG
___
On 12/12/2014 03:12 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/12/2014 03:07 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Given that fdb and entry are commonly used I think [FDBEntry]
would be fine.
It exist there in the first place makes it an entry so what's wrong
with just calling this entry [FDB]?
Hi,
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
After I explained it to them they said why not just call it [BridgeFDB] ...
+1
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
On Fri, 12.12.14 10:10, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11133
But that's 4y old... Or is your toolchain that old?
Shouldn't be:
mipsisa32r2el-axis-linux-gnu-gcc --version
mipsisa32r2el-axis-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC 4.7.2
If I get this right fdb only makes sense in a bridge context, correct?
Maybe [BridgeFDBEntry] instead?
Yes, the FDB table is used by a Layer 2 device (switch/bridge), but an ordinary
interface also has a FDB table.
[BridgeFDBEntry] seems also fine.
I mean, if networkd would simply flush
Hi,
[BrigdeFDB] can be also fine. It's just that [BridgeFDB] makes you think at the
entire forwarding database table and you are actually defining only one entry.
[BridgeFDBEntry] makes you think at just one entry in that table.
/Alin
-Original Message-
From: systemd-devel
On 12/12/2014 04:12 PM, Rauta, Alin wrote:
Hi,
[BrigdeFDB] can be also fine. It's just that [BridgeFDB] makes you think at the
entire forwarding database table and you are actually defining only one entry.
[BridgeFDBEntry] makes you think at just one entry in that table.
Hmm
So it can grow
For now I'm concerned with the FDB entries.
They are in the .network files following the logic of [Address] [Route]
sections.
/Alin
-Original Message-
From: systemd-devel [mailto:systemd-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On
Behalf Of Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
Sent: Friday, December 12,
Should the line:
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(BLKID, [ blkid = 2.24 ],
instead read
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(BLKID, [ blkid = 2.25 ],
instead since the commit message appears to mandate 2.25 not 2.24?
Regards,
___
systemd-devel mailing list
On Fri, 05.12.14 15:54, Karel Zak (k...@redhat.com) wrote:
I have added struct libmnt_monitor to make this new interface easy to
extend and usable for more resources (I'll probably also add mountinfo
fd for findmnt(8), but this is irrelevant for systemd;-)
All you need is:
mn =
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Fri, 12.12.14 10:10, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11133
But that's 4y old... Or is your toolchain that old?
Shouldn't be:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 08:11:54PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 05.12.14 15:54, Karel Zak (k...@redhat.com) wrote:
I guess it's enough to add the 'fd' to systmed sd_event_add_io() and
call mnt_table_parse_mtab() when a change is detected. (As already
implemeted in the original
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:07:23PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 12.12.14 09:07, Rauta, Alin (alin.ra...@intel.com) wrote:
What do you think about the following transformations:
[FDBEntry] = [FDBNeigh]
We try to avoid acronyms and abbreviations unless they are
The in the field problem is that after what firmware 1.7 changes with
Intel network drivers or what not things broke due to the fact that network
interfaces settings did not get inherited to the bridge interface and we
need to avoid that problem, which is why I think we need to redefine how we
Yeah, something similar is happening. If I edit the container.target and
add the Wants= instead of creating the .wants directory it works well.
I think the preset-all is syncing the config with the .wants directory as
well and removes all links which are not defined in the config. So editing
the
NetworkManager sets logind inhibitor lock to monitor for suspend
events. So it implicitly requires logind to be present when NM starts.
logind is ordered after nss-user-lookup.target. If we have remote user
database, it means that logind depends on network to be up and running.
If network is
Hi,
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
wrap a few *_FOREACH macros in curly braces
cppcheck is full of errors anyway. I don't think we should make the code
less pretty just to satisfy a checker, and a rarely used one.
While you may be right about cppcheck, IMHO it's good style to wrap
27 matches
Mail list logo
