On 12/12/2014 03:12 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 12/12/2014 03:07 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Given that "fdb" and "entry" are commonly used I think [FDBEntry]
would be fine.
It exist there in the first place makes it an "entry" so what's wrong
with just calling this entry [FDB]?
Ignore that I asked for an opinion from the network guys and they went
like what does FDB stand for?
After I explained it to them they said why not just call it [BridgeFDB] ...
JBG
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
