On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> Why does debootstrap create device nodes at all? Does Debian support
> setups with /dev being on persistent media? Note that udev has not
> supported non-devtmpfs boots since a long time. If Debian requires
> udev, then there's really
24.12.2015 03:48, Alex Crawford пишет:
> On 12/23, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>> The usual underlying cause of usage of Environment or EnvironmentFile in
>> type units is more or less always due to the fact that the
>> daemon/service cannot read configuration file on startup thus the answer
>>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 14.10.15 18:18, Lars Noschinski (nosch...@in.tum.de) wrote:
>
>> On 14.10.2015 17:33, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> > On Thu, 08.10.15 13:04, Lars Noschinski (nosch...@in.tum.de) wrote:
>> >> [please CC me on answers]
>> >> $
On 12/23, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> The usual underlying cause of usage of Environment or EnvironmentFile in
> type units is more or less always due to the fact that the
> daemon/service cannot read configuration file on startup thus the answer
> is you would use a daemon that was written i
On Wed, 23.12.15 23:12, Johan Ouwerkerk (jm.ouwerk...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > My goal is to have a light container able to build a software that runs in
> > a light container (actually in a legacy chroot). And one of the first steps
> > is to debootstrap a virgin system. Is this use case possible
Am 23.12.2015 um 23:08 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 12/23/2015 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.12.2015 um 21:12 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 12/23/2015 07:30 PM, Alex Crawford wrote:
I like this model and I'm not sure how I would solve this if
EnvironmentFile
didn't exist.
> My goal is to have a light container able to build a software that runs in a
> light container (actually in a legacy chroot). And one of the first steps is
> to debootstrap a virgin system. Is this use case possible ?
Maybe try --variant=fakechroot ? Haven't tested this but my guess is
that if
On 12/23/2015 08:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 23.12.2015 um 21:12 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 12/23/2015 07:30 PM, Alex Crawford wrote:
I like this model and I'm not sure how I would solve this if
EnvironmentFile
didn't exist.
The usual underlying cause of usage of Environment or
On 12/23/2015 07:48 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
I see no reason why systemd should be involved with this. Just make
etcd a proper daemon, and read its config data directly, rather then
serializing it into the command line.
In sys v initscript it started out as variable options, placed on to
Am 23.12.2015 um 21:12 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 12/23/2015 07:30 PM, Alex Crawford wrote:
I like this model and I'm not sure how I would solve this if
EnvironmentFile
didn't exist.
The usual underlying cause of usage of Environment or EnvironmentFile in
type units is more or less al
On 12/23/2015 07:30 PM, Alex Crawford wrote:
I like this model and I'm not sure how I would solve this if EnvironmentFile
didn't exist.
The usual underlying cause of usage of Environment or EnvironmentFile in
type units is more or less always due to the fact that the
daemon/service cannot re
On Fri, 11.12.15 11:36, Leroy Pubel (lepu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Is it considered safe to setuid on a root-owned binary that launches
> systemd-nspawn with the argument "--private-users=1000:1"?
Well, that all depends on your code... Note that SUID binaries
generally have the problem that they i
On Tue, 22.12.15 00:13, Tobias Hunger (tobias.hun...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am running on arch-linux, using systemd 228 and have a machine
> started using systemd-nspawn. It shows up in machinectl list. I can
> machinectl login MACHINE into this machine, but when I try to run
> mac
On Wed, 23.12.15 11:30, Alex Crawford (alex.crawf...@coreos.com) wrote:
> On 12/23, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 23.12.15 06:01, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > What usescases do you see for it's existence.
> >
> > Well, the usecase that this is what's out there r
On 12/23, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 23.12.15 06:01, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > What usescases do you see for it's existence.
>
> Well, the usecase that this is what's out there right now, and we have
> to stay compatible. It's not precisely an exotic feature, w
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 04:07:16PM +0100, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:55:13 +0800
> schrieb Peter Hoeg :
>
> > >So, Type=forking is the only way to have synchronization points
> > >between service that depend on each other.
> >
> > In all fairness, the presence of a PID really does
Am Wed, 23 Dec 2015 22:55:13 +0800
schrieb Peter Hoeg :
> Hi,
>
> >Type=simple cannot detect when a service is ready. Systemd simply
> >of teamviewerd but with service inter-dependencies this becomes
> >important.
> >
> >Type=simple considers the service up immediatly thus triggering
> >dependent
On Wed, 23.12.15 10:32, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.12.2015 um 07:01 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> >On 12/23/2015 12:43 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >>Just to clarify that. I think EnvironmentFile= was a mistake, and I
> >>explained why. But then again, I am n
On Wed, 23.12.15 06:01, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>
> On 12/23/2015 12:43 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >Just to clarify that. I think EnvironmentFile= was a mistake, and I
> >explained why. But then again, I am not planning to remove it, and I
> >never suggested that
On Wed, 23.12.15 02:44, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.12.2015 um 01:24 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> >On Thu, 10.12.15 16:20, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> >>
> >>Am 10.12.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> >>>If you are unaware of any ot
On Wed, 23.12.15 14:10, Emmanuel Coirier (ecoir...@olfeo.com) wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have encountered a problem with a systemd-nspawn container and deboostrap
> running in this container.
>
> When I try to launch deboostrap inside the container, debootstrap
> stops because it tries to u
Hi,
Type=simple cannot detect when a service is ready. Systemd simply
of teamviewerd but with service inter-dependencies this becomes
important.
Type=simple considers the service up immediatly thus triggering
dependent service for immediate execution while Type=forking considers
the service up
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Emmanuel Coirier
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have encountered a problem with a systemd-nspawn container and
> deboostrap running in this container.
>
> When I try to launch deboostrap inside the container, debootstrap stops
> because it tries to unpack a tar ar
Hello everyone,
I have encountered a problem with a systemd-nspawn container and deboostrap
running in this container.
When I try to launch deboostrap inside the container, debootstrap stops because
it tries to unpack a tar archive that creates devices like /dev/console. The
error is "EPERM".
Am 23.12.2015 um 07:01 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 12/23/2015 12:43 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Just to clarify that. I think EnvironmentFile= was a mistake, and I
explained why. But then again, I am not planning to remove it, and I
never suggested that.
What usescases do you see for
25 matches
Mail list logo
