Am 01.04.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Sun, 20.03.16 14:22, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
please take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319475 -
this is a unlucky behavior change, not only for usability but for scripts
with heavy output it's
Went to the wrong address. :'-(
-- Forwarded message --
From: Cecil Westerhof
Date: 2016-04-02 1:29 GMT+02:00
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Start, stop en restart service by the user
that is used to run the service script
To: Lennart Poettering
2016-04-01 21:23 GMT+02:00 Lennar
2016-04-01 21:34 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Mon, 21.03.16 09:21, Cecil Westerhof (cldwester...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > When executing
> > systemctl suspend || echo "Error code: ${?}"
> > from the command-line it outputs
> > Error code: 1
> > and it puts my machine in suspend.
> >
Hi Johann,
Am 01.04.2016 17:38 schrieb "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> So if your server has the role of an web server and the web service fails
to run or is not run ( for example you forgot to enable it, or you
misconfigured it before rebooting ) or that phone home service failed since
it could not c
Lennart, thanks for taking time to reply.
Lennart Poettering poettering.net> writes:
>
> This is probably something to ask the openvpn folks about.
I did this as well in this thread –
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.user/36761
> Note that systemd invokes services in a very mini
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 18.02.16 20:33, Mike Gilbert (flop...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Lennart Poettering
>>> wrote:
>>> > 1) systemd-initctl (i.e. the /dev/
On Sun, 20.03.16 14:22, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> please take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319475 -
> this is a unlucky behavior change, not only for usability but for scripts
> with heavy output it's also a memory usage problem
Are you sure it's no
On Mon, 21.03.16 09:21, Cecil Westerhof (cldwester...@gmail.com) wrote:
> When executing
> systemctl suspend || echo "Error code: ${?}"
> from the command-line it outputs
> Error code: 1
> and it puts my machine in suspend.
>
> When putting it in cron it gives the following errors:
>
On Mon, 21.03.16 11:02, Han Pingtian (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> % cat /etc/systemd/system/reproducer.service
> [Unit]
> Description=Reproducer of systemd services killed by pids
> After=multi-user.target
>
> [Service]
> ExecStart=/home/hpt/reproducer/reproducer.sh
> Type=forking
> The
On Thu, 24.03.16 08:19, Cecil Westerhof (cldwester...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I have a service that is run as a normal user. I can ask a status of this
> service, but would it also be possible to start, stop en restart the
> service by the user itself?
Please elaborate. Do you mean you use User= in t
On Tue, 22.03.16 10:02, Han Pingtian (ha...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> But only after about 30 minutes, a lot of systemd services failed
> and restarted like this:
>
> ... ...
> [26885.910036] systemd[1]: systemd-journald.service: Failed with result
> 'signal'.
> [26885.910218] systemd[1]: sy
On Mon, 28.03.16 18:45, John (da_audioph...@yahoo.com) wrote:
> I am trying to write a service that will start and stop kodi[1] on Linux.
> The best working draft I have so far is here[2] but it does not end in a
> clean state if I `systemctl stop kodi` so I am looking for a good way to use
>
2016-04-01 18:42 GMT+03:00 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson :
> So if your server has the role of an web server and the web service fails to
> run or is not run ( for example you forgot to enable it, or you
> misconfigured it before rebooting ) or that phone home service failed since
> it could not contact it
On 04/01/2016 03:15 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
That makes no sense that an boot is not market completed until it manage to
contact it's update servers but inline with other hacks coreOS is doing in
relation with systemd.
I sense a lo
On 04/01/2016 03:15 PM, Alex Crawford wrote:
On 04/01, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
That makes no sense that an boot is not market completed until it manage
to contact it's update servers but inline with other hacks coreOS is
doing in relation with systemd.
To what hacks, exactly, are you ref
Hi Alex,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Alex Crawford wrote:
> On 04/01, Tobias Hunger wrote:
>> IIRC both coreos and chormeOS only mark a boot as successful after
>> talking to their respective update servers. The assumption apparently
>> is that the OS can fix itself when it is able to communi
On 04/01, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> That makes no sense that an boot is not market completed until it manage
> to contact it's update servers but inline with other hacks coreOS is
> doing in relation with systemd.
To what hacks, exactly, are you referring?
-Alex
signature.asc
Description
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
> That makes no sense that an boot is not market completed until it manage to
> contact it's update servers but inline with other hacks coreOS is doing in
> relation with systemd.
I sense a lot of negativity here:-)
A server needs to p
On 04/01, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> IIRC both coreos and chormeOS only mark a boot as successful after
> talking to their respective update servers. The assumption apparently
> is that the OS can fix itself when it is able to communicate properly
> with its own update server.
This isn't quite right.
On 04/01/2016 12:44 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote:
Hi Jóhann and Vasiliy,
IIRC both coreos and chormeOS only mark a boot as successful after
talking to their respective update servers. The assumption apparently
is that the OS can fix itself when it is able to communicate properly
with its own update s
On Thu, 31.03.16 23:07, Piotr Dobrogost (p...@2016.forums.dobrogost.net) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When I start OpenVPN as a deamon from command line like this:
> `sudo OPENSSL_ENABLE_MD5_VERIFY=1 openvpn --daemon --config
> /etc/openvpn/xxx.conf`
> the tunnel comes up with no problem.
> However, when I s
Hi Jóhann and Vasiliy,
IIRC both coreos and chormeOS only mark a boot as successful after
talking to their respective update servers. The assumption apparently
is that the OS can fix itself when it is able to communicate properly
with its own update server.
It would be nice if something similar c
Reindl Harald thelounge.net> writes:
> Am 31.03.2016 um 23:07 schrieb Piotr Dobrogost:
> >
> > Please help
Harald, thanks for taking time to reply.
> get rid of MD5 and SHA1 certs in 2016
Thanks for suggestion. However it's not helpful.
> openvpn works pretty fine with systemd
Thanks for l
On 04/01/2016 10:52 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
2016-04-01 13:50 GMT+03:00 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson :
AFAIK the android boot process fires an standard broadcasting action
"ACTION_BOOT_COMPLETED" once system services are up and running in memory,
which is the time when it considered the boot being
2016-04-01 13:50 GMT+03:00 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson :
> AFAIK the android boot process fires an standard broadcasting action
> "ACTION_BOOT_COMPLETED" once system services are up and running in memory,
> which is the time when it considered the boot being completed and "stable".
Thanks, how about Ch
On 04/01/2016 10:11 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
2016-04-01 13:08 GMT+03:00 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson :
I dont see how you plan on implement this if not with either a secondary
program loader which stores an redundant environment or an kernel support
that does the similar/same thing I mean you need
2016-04-01 13:08 GMT+03:00 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson :
> I dont see how you plan on implement this if not with either a secondary
> program loader which stores an redundant environment or an kernel support
> that does the similar/same thing I mean you need to have a watchdog
> support,boot counter whi
On Thu, 24.03.16 09:52, Ian Pilcher (arequip...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I have a "disconnected" Open vSwitch on my system named ovs1. By
> "disconnected" I mean that it is not connected to any physical
> interface, bond, etc.; it exists only for inter-VM communication.
>
> I just discovered that jum
On 03/31/2016 02:31 PM, Michal Sekletar wrote:
We don't need to extend the kernel in order to implement this
particular mechanism. After new kernel is installed, you make it
default and mark as "tentative". Then, after first successful boot of
newly added bootloader entry you just remove the fl
On Tue, 29.03.16 20:09, Nathaniel McCallum (npmccal...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 23:20 +, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> > Afaik, udev only re-emits a uevent once it's done processing all the
> > rules – this part is by design. So in your case, while udev worker 1
> > is still wait
On Tue, 29.03.16 18:15, Nathaniel McCallum (npmccal...@redhat.com) wrote:
> I have a rule like this:
>
> ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="block", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="crypto_LUKS",
> ENV{ID_FS_VERSION}="1", RUN+="sh -c 'echo password | cryptsetup open
> $devnode luks-$env{ID_FS_UUID_ENC}'"
>
> Okay, my r
On Fri, 01.04.16 15:11, Omkar Panse (omkarpa...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use systemd and cgroups to control access to device nodes.
> However it doesn't seem to be working. The target is based on ARM.
>
> I have configured systemd for cgroups, created slices and also enabled
>
Hi,
I am trying to use systemd and cgroups to control access to device nodes.
However it doesn't seem to be working. The target is based on ARM.
I have configured systemd for cgroups, created slices and also enabled
required configuration in the kernel.
What am I missing?
Omkar
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't that be useful, in order to build a unit file validator / parser
> > for example?
>
> As mentioned, there's "systemd-analyze verify" which not only checks
> the general formatting but also tries to parse the various setting
On Sun, 27.03.16 19:04, Damiano Albani (damiano.alb...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've searched quite extensively but I haven't been able to find a *formal*
> description of the unit file format (e.g. via ABNF).
We never put that together really. And I am not sure we should put
together an A
35 matches
Mail list logo
