On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson <johan...@gmail.com> wrote: > That makes no sense that an boot is not market completed until it manage to > contact it's update servers but inline with other hacks coreOS is doing in > relation with systemd.
I sense a lot of negativity here:-) A server needs to provide some set of functionality. Only once that functionality is available the server has booted successfully. If it never gets to that state, then it should revert back to the previous known-good state where that functionality was still available. So all you should provide is a tool to report a successful (or failed) boot and act accordingly, so that such tests are easy to set up (and a way to trigger those tests, but systemd does cover that already:-). I don't think doing more than that makes sense. Best Regards, Tobias _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
