On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:04:27PM +, Andy Pieters wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 09:12, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >
> > provenance matters HUGELY when it comes to code, as you need a license
> > and other things as well (copyright law is strict.) "AI generated"
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 08:45:41AM +, Andy Pieters wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 08:32, Reto wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 05:56:31PM +0100, Vadim Lebedev wrote:
> > > This is what ChatGPT proposes:
> >
> > Can we like not...
> > If people want to ask a generative AI they do so on th
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 08:24:25PM +0530, Muni Sekhar wrote:
> HI all,
>
> USB devices can have multiple interfaces (functional units) that serve
> different purposes (e.g., data transfer, control, audio, etc.).
>
> Each interface can have an associated string descriptor (referred to
> as iInterf
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 08:13:15AM +, HARSHAL PATIL (QUIC) wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Can someone please reply to our query?
>
> We are really blocked due to this and unable to process in our project. It
> will be really great.
If you need paid support for a project that you depend on, I
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 01:28:57PM +, Maber, Paul wrote:
> Classification: Confidential
Really? You sent this to a public mailing list :(
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Proprietary/Confidential Information belonging to CGI
> Group Inc. and its affiliates may be contained in this message. If you
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:09:19PM +1100, Michael Chapman wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2023, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 at 10:15, Michael Chapman
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 30 Mar 2023, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > > On Mi, 29.03.23 13:53, Christoph Anton Mitterer (cales...@sc
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 04:35:10AM +0100, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
> On 10. 11. 2022. 10:20, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 05:57:57AM +0100, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
> > > On 04. 11. 2022. 11:40, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 05:00:04PM -0500, Mehmet Akbulut wrote:
> This email contains information belonging to Motional AD LLC or its
> affiliates and may contain confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
> privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, reliance, disclosure,
> distrib
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 05:57:57AM +0100, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
> On 04. 11. 2022. 11:40, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:
>
> > Dear Sirs,
> >
> > When building a RPM 6.1.0-rc3 for AlmaLinux 8.6, I have enabled
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y
> > and the result showed an unreferenced object in
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 02:17:04AM +, Branko wrote:
>
> cat /etc/udev/rules.d/99-zz-network.rules:
> ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="11:22:33:44:55:66",
> NAME="wlan17", OWNER="chosen_user", GROUP="chosen_group", MODE="0666"
Network devices do not have a group/owner/mode at all.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 02:05:09PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:28:39AM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 09:38 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Mi, 23.03.22 11:28, Luca Boccassi (bl...@debian.org) wrote:
> > >
> > > > At least
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:34:00PM +, Dave Howorth wrote:
> FWIW, I think Greg was a bit too outspoken calling long maintenance
> attempts 'crazy'; that may have intimidated some. I'm thinking of
> moving distro to one that provides longer term maintenance than my
> present one. Although CIP is
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:11:36PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> CIP 4.4 is supposed to be maintained until 2027, which is awfully
> long. The question is: is anyone putting new systemd on those
> systems? If no, then they're not relevant.
Why not email them and ask?
thanks,
gr
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 03:58:22PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 12:38 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:28:29AM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 11:59 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:28:29AM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 11:59 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:26:05AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:17:36AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:17:36AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 08:07:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:27:07PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > we are consi
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:27:07PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we are considering dropping upstream support for kernel versions < 4.4.
> Would this be a problem for anyone? (*).
Given that upstream (i.e. kernel.org) has dropped support for kernel
4.4, why not just move
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 03:04:00PM +0100, Kevin P wrote:
> Good evening everyone.
> I would like a nspawn container on my Raspberry Pi (Raspbian, systemd 247)
> to access a RTL2838 DVB-T USB stick.
> Inside the container, dump1090 will run and feed aircraft data (piaware and
> adsbexchange projects
On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 01:43:08PM +0530, Nishant Nayan wrote:
> While reading the code I came across :-
> struct Manager
> struct Worker
> Can you please provide an overview on these, I did not get a clear cut
> explanation on these structs, the code only has its member variables.
Those are the "
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 04:04:01PM +0530, Nishant Nayan wrote:
> One thought
> Is it advisable to turn off systemd-udevd if I am sure that I won't be
> adding /removing any devices to my server.
Why would you want to do that?
> Or udev also does some work while rebooting?
When booting, yes.
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 10:08:04AM +0530, Nishant Nayan wrote:
> Thanks, I will check that out.
> Is there any site where I can gain in depth code level knowledge of
> systemd-udevd?
The code is all there for you to read and understand directly. What
specific questions did you have that you did n
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 05:14:49PM +0530, Nishant Nayan wrote:
> I have started reading about udevd.
> I was trying to find out if there is a way to play with udev without
> plugging in/out any devices.
> Is there a way to trigger a uevent without plugging in devices?
Yes, look at the man page for
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 09:15:14AM +0530, Nishant Nayan wrote:
> Hi,
> Does creating a dev file in /dev creates a uevent?
The kernel creates /dev files directly in devtmpfs. When that happens,
yes the kernel sends a uevent.
If a user creates a /dev file on their own, no, no ueven happens.
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 03:13:42AM +, Spencer Ku (古世瑜) wrote:
> Hi All,
> We are developing the redfish of openbmc, and want to expose some Ethernet
> information through the redfish interface, like packet count, drop count. My
> goal is to calculate the bandwidth / drop package rate of the E
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 07:16:55PM +, lejeczek wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> I hope an expert(or two) could shed some light - I ain't a kernel nor
> hardware expert so go easy on me please - on whether it is possible to boot
> system only under certain conditions, meaning: as early as possible (grub?)
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 02:54:24PM +0800, www wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
> systemd version: v234
> kernel version: 5.1.5
That is a very old and obsolete and insecure and known-buggy kernel
version. Please work with the vendor who is forcing you to use this
kernel version as you are paying them for
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:27:53PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I would like to add a udev rule that creates a symlink to a sysfs
> directory, and a subdirectory of /run seem like the right place to put
> it. Of course this means that the subdirectory needs to exist.
sysfs should be "self-containe
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:48:41PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.06.21 um 07:04 schrieb Greg KH:
> > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 09:38:37PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Am Di., 1. Juni 2021 um 20:44 Uhr schrieb Greg KH
> > > :
> > > > W
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 09:38:37PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am Di., 1. Juni 2021 um 20:44 Uhr schrieb Greg KH
> :
> > Works for me! Make sure you are not trying to connect to 'https'.
>
> No https? Why?
Because why would serving up text files abo
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 08:28:23PM +0200, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 01/06/2021 16:16, Greg KH wrote:
> > linux-usb.org does not look broken to me, what needs to be fixed on it?
>
> I get a "503 Service Unavailable" error trying to access
> http://www.linux-usb.or
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 03:04:47PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 13.05.21 11:54, Thomas A (thomas...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to add the info for Thrustmaster T150 Racing Wheel to the hwdb. I
> > have found that the USB values are stored hwdb.d/20-usb-vendor-model
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 07:08:55PM +0200, Marc Weber wrote:
> > devtmpfs
>
> thanks. So I can modprobe (-r) the modules from both host/container,
>
> eg dahdi_transcode makes /dev/dahdi/transcode appear.
>
> But when mounting from container I can write / read from it (getting errors
>
> about c
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:20:50AM +0200, Marc Weber wrote:
> Man says:
>
> "
>
> The host system cannot be rebooted and kernel modules may not be
>loaded from within the container.
> "
>
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-February/027805.html
> said:
>
> "
> We
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:22:44AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2021, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > On Do, 18.02.21 11:48, Robert P. J. Day (rpj...@crashcourse.ca) wrote:
> >
> > > A colleague has reported the following apparent issue in a fairly
> > > old (v230) version of
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 06:09:16PM +0200, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 4:49 PM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
> > On Fr, 19.02.21 09:28, Robert P. J. Day (rpj...@crashcourse.ca) wrote:
> >
> > > i guess i expected that the CVE identifier would be in the commit
> > > message. a
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:32:03AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 1:03 AM Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:19:38PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > Next, is it possible to enhance udev so that it can report the numbe
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:19:38PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Next, is it possible to enhance udev so that it can report the number
> of devices expected for a Btrfs file system? This information is
> currently in the Btrfs superblock found on each device in the
> num_devices field.
> https://
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:56:09AM +0100, Badr Elmers wrote:
> Hi,
> Why nspawn is slow compared to docker podman and even qemu?!
> CPU tasks take twice of the time it takes in docker, podman or qemu
>
> here I filled a request to improve nspawn performance which contain the
> steps and the full t
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 11:01:47AM +0200, Adi Ml wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to generate rules in udev to block mass storage. It seems like
> it only checks the device itself (its class is 00), but not its interface
> classes (one of those is 08, a mass storage). It seems like there is only
> att
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 06:18:24PM +0200, Adi Ml wrote:
> I guess that udev can block devices from userspace only, so from there.
>
> Of course, you are right-whitelist is better.
>
> As for usbguard, I thought about using seccomp and filterring system calls
> in my udev service based on their co
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 05:31:17PM +0200, Adi Ml wrote:
> I am using udev in order to create a kiosk mode. I want to block devices
> which fit a certain vid pid.
Block devices from where? The kernel or userspace?
udev runs _after_ the kernel has seen the device and bound to it.
And usb vid/pids
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 04:30:58PM +0200, Adi Ml wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there some way to detect which system calls, I am using in udev (in
> order to filter it)?
I don't understand, if you don't know what system calls you are needing,
why do you need to filter anything? Do you not trust udev to work
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 02:54:31PM +0200, Adi Ml wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to harden my udev service with the
> SystemCallFilter option. What systemcalls should be permitted/allowed in
> order to secure it and avoid irrelevant system calls?
It all depends on what type of scripts/programs you
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:46:35PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:35:21AM +0200, Topi Miettinen wrote:
> > On 9.12.2020 2.15, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 01:15:27AM +0200, Topi Miettinen wrote:
> > > > > > > As a further argument, I just did thi
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 02:51:24PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Apparently there has been a longstanding race between udev/systemd and
> the module loader. Currently, the module loader sends a uevent right
> after sysfs initialization, but before the module calls its init
> function. However, some ud
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 02:22:17PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> honestly: do you realize that i know very well how the memory management
> of Linux works and that it's pretty fine but not part of the topic at all?
*plonk*
___
systemd-devel mailing list
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:37:20AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 28.09.20 um 11:19 schrieb Benjamin Berg:
> >> if i would set "MemoryMax" to 4G "Memory: 8.6G" would kill it when the
> >> caches are accounted in that context
> >
> > No, the kernel kicks in and reclaims memory at that point
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 01:41:33PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Memory: 8.6G
>
> looks like there is a large part of os-caching included where i wonmder
> how that's done because a file can be read by muliple processes /
> services and is hopfefully only once cached
>
> however, that value makes
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 05:29:33PM +0200, Pawel Szewczyk wrote:
> On 7/17/19 23:14, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > 100ms seems like a really long time, what exactly is it doing during
> > that time? Is the kernel spending too much time regenerating the
> > uevents?
> &
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 05:46:58PM +0200, Pawel Szewczyk wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I was recently working on reducing booting time and I see one issue that
> I think is worth discussing.
>
> The problem is the device units enumeration seems to take a long time
> (>100ms in our case) before any unit
A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I inclu
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:10:08AM -0700, Sayeed hyder wrote:
> Forgot to hit "reply all"
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:52 AM Sayeed hyder wrote:
>
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Sure, this is what I get if I use the syspath from
> > udev_device_get_syspath. As you can see, it is showing a symlink to a
>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 08:38:02AM -0700, Sayeed hyder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at the udev_device_get_driver implementation. It first gets
> the sys path and then appends "driver", and calls readlink to get the
> driver information. Does it work for all cases? While working on a project,
>
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 09:14:37PM +0100, Łukasz Słaboń wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Since starting using linux last year (xubuntu 18.04) I am experiencing
> occasional problems with wifi interface (broadcom BCM43224 rev 01
> 14e4:4353). From time to time (every 3 - 4 starts) my wifi card is not
>
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:36:16AM -0400, David Henderson wrote:
> Is there a place to just get the udev code instead of all of systemD?
No.
> I tried looking online, but it appears that the only solo versions are
> old. I guess this got merged into systemD for some reason?
Yes, it all got merg
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 10:04:19AM -0400, David Henderson wrote:
> Good morning Lennart, thanks for the follow-up! At this point I am
> only interested in building a particular program (udev) from the
> systemD collection, not help building a distribution. And I think if
> I tried to contact LFS
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 09:08:17AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 09.06.2017 23:42, Martin Wilck пишет:
> > On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 21:40 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> >>
> >> Can device and function really change? My understanding is that
> >> device
> >> part is determined by bus physical wiri
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:26:21PM +0200, Krzysztof Jackiewicz wrote:
> Thanks, for explanation.
>
> > - a collection of rpms, like a linux distro, including systemd.rpm,
> > libcryptsetup.rpm, and thousands of other loosely coupled rpms
> > → that's a mere aggregation, each of the thousands
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> On 29/05/2017 07:10, Greg KH wrote:
> > Anyway, PCI can, and will sometimes, renumber it's devices on booting
> > again, that's a known issue. It is rare, but as you have found out,
> > will happen
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 02:35:12AM +0200, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> I ask because I've done several tests, with different motherboards, adding
> and removing PCI-express cards and that expectation was not satisfied in
> many cases.
>
> For example, in one of those tests I initially had this setup:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:38:06PM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote:
> 1. someone plugs in hardware with an unknown VID/PID but CDC capabilities
> 2. modemmanager does it's magic probing and finds "this is not a modem"
> 3. the VID/PID(& more if needed) + findings is sent to a cloud db ...
Do you want a
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 01:18:12PM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote:
> > The full device should be fine if it has a WebUSB interface (even in a
> > composite scenario)
>
> Really? You want to allow someone "raw" access to a composite device
> just because of one specific interface?
>
>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:55:20PM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > - so if we can make a rule that consistently detects USB devices with a
> WebUSB
> > interface defined, we should get this in as a standard rule.
&
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:43:24AM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Simon McVittie
> > wrote:
>
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 at 10:20:33 +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote:
> > 2. make sure that webusb devices will be somehow accessible to be used
> by
> a
> >
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 06:23:13PM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 10, 2017 18:19, "Greg KH" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 06:04:46PM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote:
> > I figured that made most sense :)
> >
> > Still, it w
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 06:04:46PM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote:
> I figured that made most sense :)
>
> Still, it would be good if we could have a rule to not grab the CDC interface
> part if the device includes WebUSB functionality.
What exactly do you mean by "grab"?
> The likelihood of a modem+
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 08:39:28AM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 10, 2017 07:51, "Greg KH" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:32:40PM -0800, Reilly Grant wrote:
> > On 2017-01-09 9:55 am, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 09, 20
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:32:40PM -0800, Reilly Grant wrote:
> On 2017-01-09 9:55 am, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> > > Greg KH writes:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:40:59AM +, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
&
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:13:04PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Greg KH writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:40:59AM +, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote:
> >> Web USB can only grab devices which has special Web USB headers. It can not
> >> grab any U
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:12:11PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> I don't think we need to change anything in the kernel. What we need is
> generic udev rule that fixes up permissions for the WebUSB Interface.
>
> IIRC, WebUSB is implemented much like CDC ACM, however bInterfaceClass
> is set to
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:29:24AM +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:40:59AM +, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote:
> >> Web USB can only grab devices which has special Web USB headers. It can not
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:40:59AM +, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen wrote:
> Web USB can only grab devices which has special Web USB headers. It can not
> grab any USB device.
>
> https://wicg.github.io/webusb/#webusb-descriptors
Ah, fun :(
So, we can add a quirk into the kernel cdc-acm driver
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:20:33AM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently looking into how we can make using WebUSB devices less painful
> for users on Linux.
>
> The main purpose of WebUSB (as far as I can see) is to enable certain CDC (in
> particular - but not limited to) devices
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:33:42PM +0200, Pekka Sarnila wrote:
> On 'Predictable Network Interface Names' it states as a benefit of the new
> policy:
>
> Stable interface names even when hardware is added or removed, i.e.
> no re-enumeration takes place
>
> Unfortunately this is not true.
>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:08:27AM -0400, Chris Bell wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but I figured someone here or at
> RH would know. What's the TTL for systemd updates on EL7? My Arch box runs
> 231, but our EL7 (RHEL7.2) boxes are only at 219, where it has
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 01:55:34PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 08/16/2016 12:53 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:51:12PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>
> > On 08/16/2016 12:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
>
>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:47:16PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>
>
> On 08/16/2016 12:31 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:25:47PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> > >
> > > On 08/16/2016 11:28 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:51:12PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 08/16/2016 12:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > But agreement is usually the best way to work things out, don't you
> > think? Isn't it better than the traditional way a company works (a
> >
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:35:13PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>
>
> On 08/16/2016 12:13 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:23:03AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> > > Why cant the kernel community figure this out and solve this upstream
>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:25:47PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>
>
> On 08/16/2016 11:28 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:15:03AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> > >
> > > On 08/16/2016 10:44 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:23:03AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 08/16/2016 10:42 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> As long as this new code doesn't break things for users without those
> kernel patches, why would you object? Are you having to maintain these
> n
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:15:03AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>
>
> On 08/16/2016 10:44 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:11:27AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> > > Recent case in point is the that the wireguard maintainer was/is
> >
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:11:27AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> Recent case in point is the that the wireguard maintainer was/is interested
> seeing it property integrated into systemd. Anywork related to that could not
> be started *until* he had his stuff merged in the upstream kernel ho
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:11:27AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 08/16/2016 09:04 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15.08.16 10:53, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Johann, what you are posting here is really not helpful in any
> way.
>
>
> It
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 06:43:04AM +, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
> > Really? No journal messages are getting created at all? No users logging
> > in/out? What does strace show on those processes?
>
> Yes, messages are created - but I'm not interested in them. Maybe a
> user logs in for a
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:04:48AM +, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
> > What processes are showing up in your count? Perhaps it's just a
> > bug that needs to be fixed.
> /bin/dbus-daemon
> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-journald
> /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-logind
>
> I understand from the previous ma
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:50:36PM +, Hebenstreit, Michael wrote:
> The base system is actually pretty large (currently 1200 packages) - I
> hate that myself. Still performance wise the packages are not the
> issue. The SSDs used can easily handle that, and library loads are
> only happening on
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:29:50PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.06.2016 um 18:20 schrieb Greg KH:
> > Ok, but please ask on a fedora list as this is a fedora specific issue,
> > as it is running a very old version of systemd as well as the kernel, so
> >
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:14:22AM -0600, JB wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> Thank you very much for responding!
>
> On 6/2/2016 9:46 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:24:39AM -0600, JB wrote:
> > > I'm running kernel 3.18.22. I'm seeing some odd behavio
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:24:39AM -0600, JB wrote:
> I'm running kernel 3.18.22. I'm seeing some odd behavior from systemd. The
> motherboard is an intel board with dual onboard NIC. I installed FC21
> initially with secondary ethernet interface disabled in the BIOS. Then after
> install, I enable
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 09:14:51AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 05/27/2016 08:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Thu, 26.05.16 12:28, Chris Friesen (cbf...@mail.usask.ca) wrote:
> >
> > > So I've been playing with this a bit, but I've run into another snag. It
> > > seems that on initial
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 01:49:07PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 05/26/2016 12:41 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Chris Friesen [2016-05-26 12:28 -0600]:
> > > So I've been playing with this a bit, but I've run into another snag. It
> > > seems that on initial boot even with "net.ifnames=0" the ethe
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 09:57:05AM +0200, poma wrote:
>
> $ git tag --verify v229
> object 95adafc428b5b4be0ddd4d43a7b96658390388bc
> type commit
> tag v229
> tagger Lennart Poettering 1455208658 +0100
>
> systemd 229
> gpg: Signature made Thu 11 Feb 2016 05:37:38 PM CET using RSA key ID 9C3485B
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 05:25:09PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a service that needs to start after all the devices (network
> cards at least) have been properly processed by udev. Pretty much
> like the old 'network' sysv script.
>
> Any suggestion?
How do you define "al
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 02:42:29AM +0200, Xen wrote:
> When you say that probing on the PCI bus never ends, and if we are
> talking not about some form of hotplugging, then I really wonder what
> you're on about ;-) because I do think the kernel has a limited set of
> probes that it can perform, an
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 01:20:05AM +0200, Xen wrote:
> Greg KH schreef op 13-04-16 01:16:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:39:37AM +0200, Xen wrote:
> >> All you need to do is wait a few seconds before you start renaming
> >
> > Most machines boot to login faster than
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:39:37AM +0200, Xen wrote:
> All you need to do is wait a few seconds before you start renaming
Most machines boot to login faster than a "few seconds", so:
> or wait on some defined trigger.
Exactly what type of "defined trigger" would work for busses that you
never kn
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:13:25PM +0200, Xen wrote:
> >> You can put usb devices at the end of the list.
> >
> > Why last? How do you know they go last when scanning? How do you know
> > when / if they will show up? What about 2 USB devices? 3?
>
> To me it seems obvious that you initialize
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:49:48PM +0200, Xen wrote:
> It will just not be "predictable" when you remove or add hardware,
> because that reorders the resulting lists.
>
> Ie, if you have:
>
> ethernet0
> ethernet1
> ethernet2
>
> And you add a new device, it might become:
>
> ethernet0
> ethern
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:49:48PM +0200, Xen wrote:
> It will just not be "predictable" when you remove or add hardware,
> because that reorders the resulting lists.
>
> Ie, if you have:
>
> ethernet0
> ethernet1
> ethernet2
>
> And you add a new device, it might become:
>
> ethernet0
> ethern
1 - 100 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
