Re: [systemd-devel] Fedora NFS systemd units

2013-05-08 Thread Steve Dickson
On 06/05/13 06:29, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 05/06/2013 09:27 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: Hi, Just trying to work out a few problems on our (Mageia's) NFS packages. As with a lot of things we often take the units from Fedora (we will soon have a nicer way to share units I hope - need

Re: [systemd-devel] Fedora NFS systemd units

2013-05-08 Thread Steve Dickson
On 06/05/13 15:36, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Le 06/05/2013 11:27, Colin Guthrie a écrit : Also, It is my understanding (and feel free to correct me here) but nfs-idmap is often needed on client systems also? I'm sure I had to configure a client in the past to ensure idmap was running in order

Re: [systemd-devel] Fedora NFS systemd units

2013-05-08 Thread Steve Dickson
On 06/05/13 05:27, Colin Guthrie wrote: Hi, Just trying to work out a few problems on our (Mageia's) NFS packages. As with a lot of things we often take the units from Fedora (we will soon have a nicer way to share units I hope - need to get release out the way before I can help and put

[systemd-devel] EnvironmentFile being ignored.

2011-07-29 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, Doing a 'systemctl show' it appears my EnvironmentFile is being ignored EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/nfs (ignore=yes) Why is this happening? steved. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

[systemd-devel] systemd automounts

2011-07-29 Thread Steve Dickson
I'm trying to automount /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs for the nfs-idmap.service var-lib-nfs-rpc_pipefs.mount is: [Unit] Description=RPC Pipe File System DefaultDependencies=no [Mount] What=sunrpc Where=/var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs Type=rpc_pipefs var-lib-nfs-rpc_pipefs.automount is: [Unit] Description=RPC

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd automounts

2011-08-01 Thread Steve Dickson
On 08/01/2011 05:43 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 29.07.11 11:16, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: I'm trying to automount /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs for the nfs-idmap.service var-lib-nfs-rpc_pipefs.mount is: [Unit] Description=RPC Pipe File System DefaultDependencies

[systemd-devel] Using Multiple EnvironmentFile lines

2011-08-02 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, I noticed that the ypbind.service used multiple EnvironmentFile lines so thought this would be a good way to build command lines to daemons on the fly... So the nfs-server.service looks like: [Unit] Description=NFS Protocol Daemon After=network.target rpcbind.service

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd automounts

2011-08-02 Thread Steve Dickson
On 08/02/2011 08:55 AM, Mirco Tischler wrote: 2011/8/2 Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com: On 08/02/2011 04:35 AM, Mirco Tischler wrote: 2011/8/2 Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com: On 08/01/2011 09:10 PM, Mirco Tischler wrote: Hi 2011/8/2 Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com: Yes, this looks

Re: [systemd-devel] Using Multiple EnvironmentFile lines

2011-08-02 Thread Steve Dickson
On 08/02/2011 03:17 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 08/02/2011 07:11 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: t doesn't make much sense for me to run nfsd, mountd, rquotad and everything from a single .service unit - after all, they are separate services with their own protocols... I might want to

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] rpcbind: systemd socket activation

2014-11-21 Thread Steve Dickson
This is a re-post of Tom's patch he posted a while back. I made the following changes. * Reorganized the changes so the diff is more readable by using a goto instead of indenting 268 lines. * Removed the systemd scripts because they just didn't work and won't going to work. I did spend some

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] rpcbind: add support for systemd socket activation

2014-11-25 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, On 11/22/2014 09:24 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:43:47AM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: From: Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no Making rpcbind sockect activated will greatly simplify its integration in systemd systems. In essence, other services may now

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] rpcbind: add support for systemd socket activation

2014-11-25 Thread Steve Dickson
dependencies. Original-patch-by: Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Acked-by: Cristian Rodríguezcrrodrig...@opensuse.org Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com --- Makefile.am | 6 + configure.ac

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] rpcbind: systemd socket activation (v2)

2014-11-25 Thread Steve Dickson
This is based on a patch originally posted by Lennart Poettering: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/33774. That patch was not merged due to the lack of a shared library and as systemd was seen to be too Fedora specific. Systemd now provides a shared library, and it is (or very soon will

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] rpcbind: systemd socket activation (v2)

2014-11-26 Thread Steve Dickson
On 11/25/2014 05:40 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05:32PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: This is based on a patch originally posted by Lennart Poettering: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/33774. Have you run this by the reporter of https

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] rpcbind: add support for systemd socket activation

2014-11-26 Thread Steve Dickson
On 11/25/2014 12:05 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: From: Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no Making rpcbind sockect activated will greatly simplify its integration in systemd systems. In essence, other services may now assume that rpcbind is always available, even during very early boot. This means

Re: [systemd-devel] systemctl status not showing still running processes in inactive .mount unit cgroups (NFS specifically)

2015-01-14 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, On 01/12/2015 04:43 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote: But FWIW, your check for whether systemctl is installed via calling systemctl --help is IMO not very neat. If you're using bash here anyway, you might as well just do a: if [ -d /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd ]; then type check or if you

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Miscellaneous systemd changes (v2)

2015-01-15 Thread Steve Dickson
On 01/14/2015 10:46 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: v2: * Corrected the numerous BindTo typos Here are a few systemd changes that were suggested by the systemd folks: * Bind the nfs-idmap service to the nfs server. * Correctly bind nfs-mountd service to the nfs server. * Used

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/3] systemd: Bind the nfs-mountd service to the nfs-server service

2015-01-14 Thread Steve Dickson
to the Requires=nfs-mountd.service in the nfs-server service Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com --- systemd/nfs-mountd.service | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/systemd/nfs-mountd.service b/systemd/nfs-mountd.service index 7ccc0f7..d908afe 100644

Re: [systemd-devel] systemctl status not showing still running processes in inactive .mount unit cgroups (NFS specifically)

2015-01-12 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello On 01/12/2015 05:34 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: Hi, Looking into a thoroughly broken nfs-utils package here I noticed a quirk in systemctl status and in umount behaviour. In latest nfs-utils there is a helper binary shipped upstream called /usr/sbin/start-statd (I'll send a separate

Re: [systemd-devel] PartOf= Question

2015-01-13 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, On 01/13/2015 08:27 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: Here is what I have now in nfs-idmap.service: [Unit] Description=NFSv4 ID-name mapping service BindTo=nfs-server.service Wants=nfs-config.service After=nfs-config.service [Service] EnvironmentFile=-/run/sysconfig/nfs-utils Type

Re: [systemd-devel] PartOf= Question

2015-01-13 Thread Steve Dickson
do. Steve Dickson wrote on 12/01/15 19:58: Hello, The nfs-server service starts both the rpc-mountd service and the rpc-idmapd service when the server is started. But only brings down the rpc-mountd service when the NFS server is stopped. I want nfs-server service to bring both

Re: [systemd-devel] Running system services required for certain filesystems

2015-01-13 Thread Steve Dickson
On 01/12/2015 05:40 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote: Steve Dickson wrote on 12/01/15 20:31: Hello On 01/12/2015 05:37 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: Hi, On a related note to my previous message (subject systemctl status not showing still running processes in inactive .mount unit cgroups (NFS

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/3] systemd: Bind rpc.idmapd to the nfs-server service

2015-01-14 Thread Steve Dickson
On 01/14/2015 04:46 AM, Michal Sekletar wrote: On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:37:35PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: Since rpc.idmapd is only used by the nfs server, to do its id mapping, bind the nfs-idmapd service to the nfs-server service so rpc.idmapd will be started and stopped

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd: Have rpc-statd-notify.service Require network.target

2015-03-19 Thread Steve Dickson
On 03/03/2015 01:36 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: Its been reported that having the rpc-statd-notify service depend on network.target instead network-online.target decrease boot times as much as 10 seconds on some installs Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183293 Signed

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/2] some systemd unit changes

2015-03-19 Thread Steve Dickson
On 03/03/2015 12:28 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: Hello NFS developers, reposting the two patches inline as requested by Steve. I'm currently systemd-ifying our nfs-utils Ubuntu package. For testing I put the NFS server and client (i. e. localhost:/foo/bar mounts) on the same machine. With

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/1] details for starting nfs-idmapd also on clients

2015-03-06 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, On 03/06/2015 06:15 AM, Martin Pitt wrote: Hello all, Steve Langasek pointed out in [1] that idmapd is also necessary on the client side. It isn't for my very simple NFSv4 test, but then again I don't know that much about the various other modes of operation. This patch starts

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd: Have rpc-statd-notify.service Require network.target

2015-03-06 Thread Steve Dickson
On 03/03/2015 05:51 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:37:24PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: On 03/03/2015 02:18 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:06:57PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: Indeed. From the man page: -m retry-time

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd: Have rpc-statd-notify.service Require network.target

2015-03-03 Thread Steve Dickson
Its been reported that having the rpc-statd-notify service depend on network.target instead network-online.target decrease boot times as much as 10 seconds on some installs Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183293 Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com Reported-by: Eric

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd: Have rpc-statd-notify.service Require network.target

2015-03-03 Thread Steve Dickson
On 03/03/2015 02:18 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:06:57PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: Indeed. From the man page: -m retry-time Specifies the length of time, in minutes, to continue retry‐ ing notifications to unresponsive hosts. If this

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] systemd: Relax dependencies of services

2015-03-03 Thread Steve Dickson
On 03/03/2015 03:12 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: Hello all, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2015-03-03 19:08 +0100]: Are you sure that all of those nfs daemons do not require sockets.target and other stuff provided by basic.target to be ready? The corresponding upstart jobs trigger on virtual

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Miscellaneous systemd changes

2015-01-13 Thread Steve Dickson
Here are a few systemd changes that were suggested by the systemd folks: * Bind the nfs-idmap service to the nfs server. * Correctly bind nfs-mountd service to the nfs server. * Used approved way to check if systemd is install and running Steve Dickson (3): systemd: Bind rpc.idmapd

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/3] systemd: Bind the nfs-mountd service to the nfs-server service

2015-01-13 Thread Steve Dickson
to the Requires=nfs-mountd.service in the nfs-server service Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com --- systemd/nfs-mountd.service | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/systemd/nfs-mountd.service b/systemd/nfs-mountd.service index 7ccc0f7..c16af57 100644 --- a/systemd

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 3/3] start-statd: Use the canonical to check if systemd is running.

2015-01-13 Thread Steve Dickson
Use the approved way, define in http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/sd_booted.html to check if systemd is installed and running Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com --- utils/statd/start-statd | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/utils

[systemd-devel] systemd and kernel process

2015-09-30 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, Is there a way for systemd to monitor kernel process? By monitor I mean the existence. Here the story... a systemd service calls a command that creates a number kernel process/threads then the command exits. Is there a way for systemd to monitor those kernel process even though it

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and kernel process

2015-10-01 Thread Steve Dickson
On 10/01/2015 09:24 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Steve Dickson <ste...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Is there a way for systemd to monitor kernel process? >> By monitor I mean the existence. > > No, and there is no plan to do anything l

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and kernel process

2015-10-03 Thread Steve Dickson
On 10/01/2015 03:50 PM, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Steve Dickson <ste...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 10/01/2015 09:24 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Steve Dickson <ste...@redhat.com> wrote:

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and kernel process

2015-10-03 Thread Steve Dickson
On 10/03/2015 08:18 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 30.09.15 16:49, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Is there a way for systemd to monitor kernel process? > > To add to what Kay said: > > No. Kernel threads cannot r

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] gssd: Improve scalability by not waiting for child processes

2015-09-23 Thread Steve Dickson
Instead of waiting on every fork, which would become a bottle neck during a mount storm, simply set a SIGCHLD signal handler to do the wait on the child process Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <ste...@redhat.com> --- utils/gssd/gssd.c | 18 ++ utils/gssd/gssd_proc.

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] gssd: Improve scalability by not waiting for child processes

2015-10-05 Thread Steve Dickson
On 10/04/2015 04:19 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Steve Dickson: > >> +static void >> +sig_child(int signal) >> +{ >> +int err; >> +pid_t pid; >> + >> +/* Parent: just wait on child to exit and return */ >> +do { >> +

[systemd-devel] Variables in the [Unit] section of a server

2016-01-13 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, Is is possible to set a variable in the [Unit] section of a service? For example in rpc-gssd.service there is ConditionPathExists=/etc/krb5.keytab but for some installation the krb5.keytab is in a different place. The rpc.gssd daemon can be told this by setting a command line

Re: [systemd-devel] Variables in the [Unit] section of a server

2016-02-02 Thread Steve Dickson
On 01/23/2016 11:33 AM, Armin K. wrote: > On 23.01.2016 17:28, Armin K. wrote: >>> On 01/13/2016 10:51 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Is is possible to set a variable in the [Unit] >>>> sec

Re: [systemd-devel] Variables in the [Unit] section of a server

2016-01-23 Thread Steve Dickson
Thank for the discussion... It was very helpful! steved. On 01/13/2016 10:51 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > Is is possible to set a variable in the [Unit] > section of a service? > > For example in rpc-gssd.service there is > ConditionPathExists=/etc/krb5.key

[systemd-devel] rpc-gssd.service failure

2016-03-19 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello all, When systemd starts the rpc.gssd.service, the service fails with: * rpc-gssd.service - RPC security service for NFS client and server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/rpc-gssd.service; static; vendor preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed

Re: [systemd-devel] nfs-server.service starts before _netdev iscsi mount completes (required)... how can I fix this?

2016-11-07 Thread Steve Dickson
On 11/04/2016 04:47 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 04.11.16 11:12, c...@endlessnow.com (c...@endlessnow.com) wrote: > >>> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 04:01:15PM -0700, c...@endlessnow.com wrote: >> >> so I'm using CentOS 7, and we're mounting a disk from our >> iSCSI >> >> SAN and

Re: [systemd-devel] rpcbind.socket failing

2016-11-01 Thread Steve Dickson
On 11/01/2016 09:31 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 31.10.16 13:19, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> [Unit] >> Description=RPCbind Server Activation Socket >> DefaultDependencies=no >> RequiresMountsFor=/var/run /run >> Wants=rpc

Re: [systemd-devel] rpcbind.socket failing

2016-11-01 Thread Steve Dickson
On 10/31/2016 03:40 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Why is it using /var/run (where /var could be on a separate partition) > and not /run for the socket files? Historical reasons?? I guess that's way its always been and never caused a problem... steved. > > 2016-10-31 18:19 GMT

Re: [systemd-devel] rpcbind.socket failing

2016-11-01 Thread Steve Dickson
On 10/31/2016 06:07 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:19:24 -0400 > schrieb Steve Dickson <ste...@redhat.com>: > >> Upstream has come up with some new rpcbind service socket files >> and I'm trying to incorporate them into f25. >> >> T

Re: [systemd-devel] rpcbind.socket failing

2016-11-01 Thread Steve Dickson
On 11/01/2016 11:47 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 01.11.16 11:11, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> >> >> On 10/31/2016 03:40 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Why is it using /var/run (where /var could be on a separate partition) >

Re: [systemd-devel] rpcbind.socket failing

2016-11-01 Thread Steve Dickson
On 11/01/2016 12:14 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 01.11.2016 um 17:05 schrieb Steve Dickson: >> and I still getting the following errors >> >> rpcbind.socket: Failed to listen on sockets: No such file or directory I though this was talking about /run/rpcbind.

[systemd-devel] rpcbind.socket failing

2016-10-31 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, Upstream has come up with some new rpcbind service socket files and I'm trying to incorporate them into f25. The rpcbind.socket is failing to come up rpcbind.socket: Failed to listen on sockets: No such file or directory Failed to listen on RPCbind Server Activation Socket. But the

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-07-10 Thread Steve Dickson
Hey Neil, On 07/04/2017 06:20 PM, NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, May 30 2017, NeilBrown wrote: > >> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly. >> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting. > > For those who aren't closely watching systemd development, a > patch was

[systemd-devel] Dropping core with Systemd.

2017-05-15 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, I want rpcbind to drop core so I can debug something but systemd keeps getting in the way systemd: rpcbind.service: Main process exited, code=killed, status=6/ABRT audit: ANOM_ABEND auid=4294967295 uid=32 gid=32 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:rpcbind_t:s0 pid=2787 comm="rpcbind"

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-06-07 Thread Steve Dickson
On 06/07/2017 08:02 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 07.06.17 06:08, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> >> >> On 06/06/2017 05:49 PM, NeilBrown wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 06 2017, Steve Dickson wrote: >>> >>>> He

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-06-07 Thread Steve Dickson
On 06/07/2017 04:13 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 06.06.17 21:57, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> 2017-06-06 20:07 GMT+02:00 Steve Dickson <ste...@redhat.com>: >>> Finally, the whole idea of systemd randomly/silently >>> stri

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-06-07 Thread Steve Dickson
On 06/07/2017 04:12 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 06.06.17 14:07, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On 05/29/2017 06:19 PM, NeilBrown wrote: >>> >>> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-06-07 Thread Steve Dickson
On 06/06/2017 05:49 PM, NeilBrown wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06 2017, Steve Dickson wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On 05/29/2017 06:19 PM, NeilBrown wrote: >>> >>> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly. >>> It has other, bett

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-06-08 Thread Steve Dickson
On 06/08/2017 01:16 AM, NeilBrown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07 2017, Steve Dickson wrote: > >> On 06/07/2017 08:02 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> On Wed, 07.06.17 06:08, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-06-08 Thread Steve Dickson
On 06/07/2017 12:08 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 06:04:12AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >> # ps ax | grep mount >> 980 ?Ss 0:00 /sbin/mount.nfs nfssrv:/home/tmp /mnt/tmp -o rw,bg > > Right, but I think we also need to see a "

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nfs.man: document incompatibility between "bg" option and systemd.

2017-06-06 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, On 05/29/2017 06:19 PM, NeilBrown wrote: > > Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly. > It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting. The only problem with this is bg mounts still work at least up to 4.11 kernel... It appears there is a problem with a 4.12

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] rpcbind.service: Not pulling the rpcbind.target

2017-12-14 Thread Steve Dickson
header referring to the "$portmap" facility. Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <ste...@redhat.com> --- systemd/rpcbind.service.in | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/systemd/rpcbind.service.in b/systemd/rpcbind.service.in index f8cfa9f..2b49c24 1006

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] rpcbind.service: Not pulling the rpcbind.target

2017-12-14 Thread Steve Dickson
On 12/14/2017 01:47 PM, Uoti Urpala wrote: > On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 13:24 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> >> On 12/14/2017 12:48 PM, Uoti Urpala wrote: >>> On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 12:05 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >>>> +Wants=rpcbind.socket rpcbind.target >&

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] rpcbind.service: Not pulling the rpcbind.target

2017-12-14 Thread Steve Dickson
On 12/14/2017 12:48 PM, Uoti Urpala wrote: > On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 12:05 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> According to systemd.special(7) manpage: >> >> rpcbind.target >> The portmapper/rpcbind pulls in this target and orders itself >> before it, to i

[systemd-devel] [PATCH][V2] rpcbind.service: Not pulling the rpcbind.target

2017-12-15 Thread Steve Dickson
with an LSB header referring to the "$portmap" facility. Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <ste...@redhat.com> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431574 --- systemd/rpcbind.service.in | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/systemd/rpcb

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH][V2] rpcbind.service: Not pulling the rpcbind.target

2017-12-15 Thread Steve Dickson
On 12/15/2017 09:52 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fr, 15.12.17 08:00, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> According to systemd.special(7) manpage: >> >> rpcbind.target >> The portmapper/rpcbind pulls in this target and orders itself >

Re: [systemd-devel] Question on Before=

2019-02-02 Thread Steve Dickson
On 2/2/19 4:03 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 03:03:22PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> >> >> On 2/2/19 2:48 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 02:42:15PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> &

[systemd-devel] Question on Before=

2019-02-02 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, In a.service I have [Unit] Before=b.service [Install] RequiredBy=b.service when I systemd start b.service (which happens to fail) but... a.service is not being run. So I guess my question is what do I have to do to ensure a.service is *always* run before b.service? tia, steved.

Re: [systemd-devel] Question on Before=

2019-02-02 Thread Steve Dickson
On 2/2/19 2:48 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 02:42:15PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Hello, >> >> In a.service I have >> >> [Unit] >> Before=b.service >> >> [Install] >> RequiredBy=b.service &g

Re: [systemd-devel] Question on Before=

2019-02-02 Thread Steve Dickson
On 2/2/19 3:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 02.02.19 um 21:05 schrieb Steve Dickson: >> On 2/2/19 2:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Am 02.02.19 um 20:42 schrieb Steve Dickson: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> In a.service I have

Re: [systemd-devel] Question on Before=

2019-02-02 Thread Steve Dickson
On 2/2/19 2:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 02.02.19 um 20:42 schrieb Steve Dickson: >> Hello, >> >> In a.service I have >> >> [Unit] >> Before=b.service >> >> [Install] >> RequiredBy=b.service >> >>

Re: [systemd-devel] Question on Before=

2019-02-02 Thread Steve Dickson
On 2/2/19 4:07 PM, Uoti Urpala wrote: > On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 15:03 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >>> Have you enabled a.service? >>> >> No... I did not think I had to... I figured >> when b.service was started, a.service would be >> run

[systemd-devel] systemd and chroot()

2019-06-04 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, We are adding some new functionality to the NFS server that will make it a bit more container friendly... This new functionality needs to do a chroot(2) system call. This systemcall is failing with EPERM due to the following AVC error: AVC avc: denied { sys_chroot } for pid=2919

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and chroot()

2019-06-04 Thread Steve Dickson
On 6/4/19 12:45 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:42 AM Steve Dickson wrote: >> AVC avc: denied { sys_chroot } for pid=2919 comm="rpc.mountd" >> capability=18 scontext=system_u:system_r:nfsd_t:s0 >> tcontext=system_u:system_r:nfsd_t:s0

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and chroot()

2019-06-04 Thread Steve Dickson
On 6/4/19 1:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:42:35PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Hello, >> >> We are adding some new functionality to the NFS server that >> will make it a bit more container friendly... >> >> This

[systemd-devel] nfs-convert.service

2022-08-19 Thread Steve Dickson
Hello, I'm trying to remove nfsconvert from Fedora but I'm getting the following systemd error after I removed the command and the service file. # systemctl restart nfs-server Failed to restart nfs-server.service: Unit nfs-convert.service not found There is nothing in the nfs-utils files that

Re: [systemd-devel] nfs-convert.service

2022-08-22 Thread Steve Dickson
Thanks for the reply! On 8/22/22 4:09 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fr, 19.08.22 11:21, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: Hello, I'm trying to remove nfsconvert from Fedora but I'm getting the following systemd error after I removed the command and the service file. # systemctl

Re: [systemd-devel] nfs-convert.service

2022-08-22 Thread Steve Dickson
On 8/22/22 9:46 AM, Steve Dickson wrote: Thanks for the reply! On 8/22/22 4:09 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fr, 19.08.22 11:21, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote: Hello, I'm trying to remove nfsconvert from Fedora but I'm getting the following systemd error after I removed