systemd.exec(5) says.
--
Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 10:51 +0100, Marwan Rabbâa wrote:
that is not very useful for me. /var/www/gitlab/script/sidekiq is just
a litle startup script for sidekiq
#!/usr/bin/env sh
cd /var/www/gitlab
/usr/local/bin/bundle exec sidekiq -q
On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 11:16 +0100, Marwan Rabbâa wrote:
there is already Type=forking in the service section
Indeed, I got confused between your two services (the second one doesn't
have it).
And the systemctl status output says the exit code was 1, not 0, so it
has indeed nothing to do with
Hi,
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 12:26 +0500, Muhammad Shakeel wrote:
If there is a foo.service which is required to run during first system
boot then what is the best solution to permanently disable it afterwards?
I can think of two solutions but I am not sure which one is correct/more
The documentation makes it sound like ExecStopPost is only run when
stopping the service with `systemctl stop foo.service`
However, that is not the case, as it also gets run when the service
unexpectedly exists, crashes, or gets SIGKILLed.
---
man/systemd.service.xml | 9 ++---
1 file
The documentation makes it sound like ExecStopPost is only run when
stopping the service with `systemctl stop foo.service`
However, that is not the case, as it also gets run when the service
unexpectedly exists, crashes, or gets SIGKILLed.
---
man/systemd.service.xml | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2
On Friday, March 08, 2013 09:40 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 04:26:36AM -0500, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
The documentation makes it sound like ExecStopPost is only run when
stopping the service with `systemctl stop foo.service`
However, that is not the case
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 09:40 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 05.03.13 21:24, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
(Whenever there's more than one local X11 display, gdm itself certainly
needs to be able to put a small GNOME session on behalf of the
special-purpose
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 23:57 -0400, Paul Richards wrote:
1. My program just runs once on startup and then exits. Do I need to
put anything in the service file for that?
Use Type=oneshot in the Service section.
Otherwise, by default the type is 'simple', and as such systemd will
consider your
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:49 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/30/2012 09:13 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Is this failing to see the /etc/systemd/system/httpd.service file? Or is
the
include failing?
Include might failing since there is currently no way to replace
existing entry
On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 04:02 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.06.2012 02:21, schrieb Tom Lane:
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
On Wed, 27.06.12 14:50, Honza Horak (hho...@redhat.com) wrote:
One of the issue is (in)ability to imitate the original behavior of
mysqld_safe,
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 08:44 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 20.06.12 10:17, Mathieu Bridon (boche...@fedoraproject.org) wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 19:15 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 19.06.12 18:50, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
Hi
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 19:15 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 19.06.12 18:50, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:03:23AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 18.06.12 21:56, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net)
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 23:42 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
I've been playing with the offline updates thing a bit. Is this the
kind of service file that PackageKit should install into
/usr/lib/systemd/system/ ?
[Unit]
Description=Updates the operating system whilst offline
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 21:19 -0600, David Lambert wrote:
I have got a little further in diagnosing this memory leak of
systemd-journal. It appears to worsen when I have a process that emits
data to stdout. I presume that systemd-journal is attempting to put this
somewhere but failing, and
Hi,
I'm playing with mount units as a replacement of traditional fstab
declaration as I'd like to use some systemd facilities, for example
requirements between services and their underlying storage.
The systemd.mount(5) manual says:
If the mount point is not existing at time of mounting, it
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 18:12 +0800, microcai wrote:
Hi guys.
I had this issue since the release of systemd-37.
system start up hang on syslog-ng
If I comment out ExecStartPre=/bin/systemctl stop systemd-kmsg-syslogd.service
then system boots successfull. But, dbus-daemon keep on poluting
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 20:51 +0300, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello!
I already found that I could add LimitNOFILE=2048 to the Service
section to explicitly set max number of opened files but I need
something different. I want to allow user to specify it and set it
only in case he specifies it.
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 10:50 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.09.2011 10:11, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
please open a bugreport - maybe they would hear if i am not would be the
only person who is unhappy about what was done with F15 but all others
out there are silent and hoping for
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 11:50 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.09.2011 11:45, schrieb Jan Willies:
2011/9/1 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net
also having the restart-options but no way to set them without
override the whole .service file is
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 21:33 +0200, Warpme wrote:
4\systemctl restart daemon1 restarts also application1
[... snip ...]
Unfortunately for 4\ systemctl hangs during execution systemctl restart
daemon1.
It is bug or I completely misunderstand systemd configuration rules ?
I found the same
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 08:13 -0700, Leisner, Martin wrote:
I want to use an out of date image -- I'm looking to port to 2.6.34...
(I even had to start patching the kernel to give me /sys/fs/cgroup -- I don't
have the hierarchy under that yet).
I'm building systemd-5 for starters...(it works
22 matches
Mail list logo
