On 02/12/2015 04:38 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
2015-02-11 20:12 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
So, I have discussed this with Kay, David, Daniel, and co. And we
kinda came to the conclusion that we might as well just drop the
configurability where runlevel3-5.target point
On Thu, 12.02.15 05:38, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2015-02-11 20:12 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
So, I have discussed this with Kay, David, Daniel, and co. And we
kinda came to the conclusion that we might as well just drop the
configurability where
В Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:19:16 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net пишет:
But the problem is not limited to legacy initscripts. It makes it
generally unsafe to have aliases via symlinks. Aliases were always
meant for compatibility but this problems exactly means that
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:12:35PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 05.02.15 01:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
Just want to know why he didn't considered pushing this patch upstream.
Apparently already two distros patch this downstream, so having a fix
On Thu, 05.02.15 01:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
Just want to know why he didn't considered pushing this patch upstream.
Apparently already two distros patch this downstream, so having a fix
upstream would imho make sense.
Because it was just a hack :)
On Wed, 11.02.15 23:10, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
В Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:12:35 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net пишет:
On Thu, 05.02.15 01:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
wrote:
Just want to know why he didn't considered
2015-02-11 20:12 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
So, I have discussed this with Kay, David, Daniel, and co. And we
kinda came to the conclusion that we might as well just drop the
configurability where runlevel3-5.target point to. If we drop that, we
Do you mean
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 09:12:32AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Wed, 4 Feb 2015 01:29:11 +0100
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net пишет:
On Thu, 25.12.14 08:37, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
This looks like fallout of moving to generators for sysv units.
[grr, accidentally dropped the mailing list on my previous reply]
2015-02-04 21:48 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Wed, 04.02.15 21:15, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2015-02-04 2:12 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Wed, 04.02.15 02:05,
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:53:20PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
[grr, accidentally dropped the mailing list on my previous reply]
2015-02-04 21:48 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Wed, 04.02.15 21:15, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2015-02-04 2:12 GMT+01:00
On Thu, 25.12.14 08:37, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
This looks like fallout of moving to generators for sysv units. Before
systemd added dependencies on runlevelX.target directly to units built
from initscripts. This forced runlevelX.target resolution and
everything was OK.
2015-02-04 1:29 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Thu, 25.12.14 08:37, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
This looks like fallout of moving to generators for sysv units. Before
systemd added dependencies on runlevelX.target directly to units built
from
On Wed, 04.02.15 01:52, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2015-02-04 1:29 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Thu, 25.12.14 08:37, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
This looks like fallout of moving to generators for sysv units. Before
systemd added
2015-02-04 1:54 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Wed, 04.02.15 01:52, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
Is this the same issue as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002806#c20 ?
Feels like it.
It's not clear to me though why the bug was closed, i.e.
On Wed, 04.02.15 02:05, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2015-02-04 1:54 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Wed, 04.02.15 01:52, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
Is this the same issue as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002806#c20 ?
Feels
В Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:23:16 +0300
Ivan Shapovalov intelfx...@gmail.com пишет:
On Tuesday 09 December 2014 at 17:25:48, Francis Moreau wrote:
Hello Lennart,
Thanks for answering !
On 12/09/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.12.14 11:19, Francis Moreau
On 12/10/2014 10:19 AM, Francis Moreau wrote:
Hello,
On 12/10/2014 07:23 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
On Tuesday 09 December 2014 at 17:25:48, Francis Moreau wrote:
Hello Lennart,
Thanks for answering !
On 12/09/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.12.14 11:19,
Hello,
On 12/10/2014 07:23 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
On Tuesday 09 December 2014 at 17:25:48, Francis Moreau wrote:
Hello Lennart,
Thanks for answering !
On 12/09/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.12.14 11:19, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello,
I've a very weird behaviour with systemd 217:
# systemctl show -p Wants multi-user.target | grep network.service
# systemctl show -p Wants runlevel3.target | grep network.service
Wants= ... network.service ...
# systemctl show -p Wants multi-user.target | grep network.service
Wants=...
On Tue, 09.12.14 11:19, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello,
I've a very weird behaviour with systemd 217:
# systemctl show -p Wants multi-user.target | grep network.service
# systemctl show -p Wants runlevel3.target | grep network.service
Wants= ... network.service ...
Hello Lennart,
Thanks for answering !
On 12/09/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.12.14 11:19, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello,
I've a very weird behaviour with systemd 217:
# systemctl show -p Wants multi-user.target | grep network.service
#
On Tuesday 09 December 2014 at 17:25:48, Francis Moreau wrote:
Hello Lennart,
Thanks for answering !
On 12/09/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 09.12.14 11:19, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hello,
I've a very weird behaviour with systemd 217:
22 matches
Mail list logo
