I have sent the following message to various desktop environment mailing lists
SUBJECT: Proposal: passing user idle time to systemd-logind
KDE Plasma: https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/2019-May/098194.html
GNOME: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-May/msg00088.html
Il giorno mer 22 mag 2019 alle ore 11:41 Mantas Mikulėnas
ha scritto:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019, 12:37 Germano Massullo
> wrote:
>> Second question: perhaps can be useful if I start a topic in GNOME /
>> KDE Plasma development mailing lists asking them to make patches that
>> will let
On Wed, May 22, 2019, 12:37 Germano Massullo
wrote:
> Il giorno mer 22 mag 2019 alle ore 11:17 Mantas Mikulėnas
> ha scritto:
> > If your program is already X11-based, you could use the screensaver
> protocol to get idle status and forward it to logind.
>
> BOINC client is just a service, and
Il giorno mer 22 mag 2019 alle ore 11:17 Mantas Mikulėnas
ha scritto:
> If your program is already X11-based, you could use the screensaver protocol
> to get idle status and forward it to logind.
BOINC client is just a service, and it runs on machines that can run
X11, Wayland, or no graphical
On Wed, May 22, 2019, 12:13 Germano Massullo
wrote:
> Good day.
> I have noticed that on many Linux distributions with different desktop
> environments, the properties
> IdleSinceHint
> IdleSinceHintMonotonic
> are always equal to zero. This happens even if you try to use a sleep
> in order to
Good day.
I have noticed that on many Linux distributions with different desktop
environments, the properties
IdleSinceHint
IdleSinceHintMonotonic
are always equal to zero. This happens even if you try to use a sleep
in order to simulate a kind of user inactivity.
What is this happening?
I have
Perfect, thank you very much!
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Do, 16.05.19 17:12, Germano Massullo (germano.massu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> To do practise I am using NetworkManager example [1]
> All macros passed as arguments to functions
> g_dbus_proxy_call_sync
> g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync
> are implemented at [2].
> Is there an equivalent of [2] for
To do practise I am using NetworkManager example [1]
All macros passed as arguments to functions
g_dbus_proxy_call_sync
g_dbus_proxy_new_for_bus_sync
are implemented at [2].
Is there an equivalent of [2] for logind? I made a quick search into
systemd repository [3] but I am getting too many
On Di, 14.05.19 11:32, Germano Massullo (germano.massu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Il giorno lun 13 mag 2019 alle ore 10:00 Lennart Poettering
> ha scritto:
> > Note that it only works correctly on desktops that support it.
>
> Thank you for your reply. Why does it work only on desktop
> environments
Il giorno lun 13 mag 2019 alle ore 10:00 Lennart Poettering
ha scritto:
> Note that it only works correctly on desktops that support it.
Thank you for your reply. Why does it work only on desktop
environments that support it? I believed that it provides idle infos
to the D.E. not viceversa
On Mi, 08.05.19 14:37, Germano Massullo (germano.massu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi, I am doing some practice with writing software using GDBus API. I
> need it to implement on BOINC client, user(s) idle time detection by
> retrieving such info from logind.
> In order to retrieve user idle time I
Hi, I am doing some practice with writing software using GDBus API. I
need it to implement on BOINC client, user(s) idle time detection by
retrieving such info from logind.
In order to retrieve user idle time I was thinking of using the
property IdleSinceHint. What do you think about?
Best
13 matches
Mail list logo
