On 02/18/2014 01:33 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Jan Janssen medhe...@web.de wrote:
the *.link files for networkd completely lack documentation.
They are documented in udev(8). Let me know if anything is unclear or lacking.
And in general,
I would say that
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 02:03 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 20.02.14 01:21, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
Even if there can be reasonable style disagreements about exactly where
to use mixed declarations, at least some uses of them are certainly
beneficial. It's only
It was 2014-02-18 wto 03:26, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
for a 2-3 week cycle... The big dbus transition took some time however.
Aynway, I
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 18/02/14 02:26 did gyre and gimble:
Heya!
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Łukasz Stelmach
l.stelm...@samsung.com wrote:
It was 2014-02-18 wto 03:26, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
for
It was 2014-02-19 śro 15:52, when Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Łukasz Stelmach
l.stelm...@samsung.com wrote:
It was 2014-02-18 wto 03:26, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Łukasz Stelmach l.stelm...@samsung.com wrote:
It was 2014-02-19 śro 15:52, when Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Łukasz Stelmach
l.stelm...@samsung.com wrote:
It was 2014-02-18 wto 03:26, when Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
It's
On Wed, 19.02.14 11:47, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 18/02/14 02:26 did gyre and gimble:
Heya!
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Please try to rebuild things again. You should still see some noise, but
much less. Can you post your results again?
This should show it for you too:
$ make -j8 distcheck
Kay
The only thing in master I'm still having to patch in production is
the is-enabled code path so it doesn't look up all the symlinks. I
don't see that as a release blocker, though.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
On Wed, 19.02.14 10:53, David Timothy Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
The only thing in master I'm still having to patch in production is
the is-enabled code path so it doesn't look up all the symlinks. I
don't see that as a release blocker, though.
David,
did you see the changes I
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
did you see the changes I made to the cgroup mask propagation bits? I
reworked some code there to make sure that the mask doesn't keep
increasing, but actually can lose bits again if cgroup properties are
unset.
On Wed, 19.02.14 19:43, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 19/02/14 16:53 did gyre and gimble:
Soo, pretty much all of these are false positives triggered by
-flto. Before adding -flto we only got these fals positives within
source files,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
Now, as far as I can see I didn't break your scalibility changes,
but I was wondering if you could give this a test run with your huge
number of units setup?
With 4000 units (2000 sockets and 2000 corresponding
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 17:53 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Zbigniew suggest we should drop -Wdeclaration-after-statement. I am not
convinced that that would be a good idea since generally declarations
after statements are an abomination, and we should avoid them, and it is
nice if gcc warns
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:21:01AM +0200, Uoti Urpala wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 17:53 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Zbigniew suggest we should drop -Wdeclaration-after-statement. I am not
convinced that that would be a good idea since generally declarations
after statements are an
On Wed, 19.02.14 21:54, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
Thanks for that. I did remember reading some posts about compilers so
figured they were all down to that but nice that an actual bug was found
too.
Here's the results with 8f61afd.
Are you sure you updated this
On Thu, 20.02.14 01:21, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 17:53 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Zbigniew suggest we should drop -Wdeclaration-after-statement. I am not
convinced that that would be a good idea since generally declarations
after statements
On 02/18/2014 05:03 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
A related question is wheter Fedora should get this release in rawhide:
I think yes, but with --disable-kdbus --enable-compat-libs. It's nice
thathttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065572 got fixed just
in time.
Rawhide is
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:57:23AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/18/2014 05:03 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
A related question is wheter Fedora should get this release in rawhide:
I think yes, but with --disable-kdbus --enable-compat-libs. It's nice
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:26:35AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/18/2014 05:03 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
A related question is wheter Fedora should get this release in rawhide:
I think yes, but with --disable-kdbus --enable-compat-libs. It's nice
On 02/18/2014 03:26 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
for a 2-3 week cycle... The big dbus transition took some time however.
Aynway, I just finished a
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Jan Janssen medhe...@web.de wrote:
the *.link files for networkd completely lack documentation.
They are documented in udev(8). Let me know if anything is unclear or lacking.
And in general,
I would say that networkd could benefit from a more detailed man page
On Tue, 18.02.14 06:03, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
for a 2-3 week cycle... The big dbus transition took some time
On Tue, 18.02.14 12:26, Cecil Westerhof (cecil.wester...@snow.nl) wrote:
On 02/18/2014 03:26 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
for a 2-3 week cycle...
On 02/18/2014 02:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
for a 2-3 week cycle... The big dbus transition took some time however.
Aynway, I just finished a
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Februar 2014 um 13:33 Uhr
Von: Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no
An: Jan Janssen medhe...@web.de
Cc: systemd Mailing List systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Betreff: Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] It's release time!
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Jan Janssen medhe
Hi,
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 03:26 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Kay, Zbigniew, Tom, David, Patrik, anything left to fix before I roll a
release? I'd like to roll the release tomorrow (tuesday) or
wednesday. Please have a closer look and test!
I'm fine with the DHCP state of affairs
2014-02-18 3:26 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Heya!
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
for a 2-3 week cycle... The big dbus transition took some time however.
2014-02-18 18:36 GMT+01:00 Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com:
What's interesting, running (as root)
sudo make check
I get two failing tests:
./build-aux/test-driver: line 107: 18426 Aborted $@
$log_file 21
FAIL: test-unit-name
./build-aux/test-driver: line 107: 18519 Aborted
On Tue, 18.02.14 18:36, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2014-02-18 3:26 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Heya!
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
Heya!
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
for a 2-3 week cycle... The big dbus transition took some time however.
Aynway, I just finished a review of the git history, marked backportable
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:26:35AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya!
It's release time again! It has been more than 4 months now since the
last release. That's kinda emberassing, since we actually intended to go
for a 2-3 week cycle... The big dbus transition took some time however.
34 matches
Mail list logo
