On 27 January 2015 at 21:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:30:48PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Tue, 27.01.15 15:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, I think attempting any kind of dependency removal *from loaded
>>
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:30:48PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 27.01.15 15:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > Yes, I think attempting any kind of dependency removal *from loaded
> > units* would be very complicated, and would require major surgery to
>
On Tue, 27.01.15 16:18, Christian Seiler (christ...@iwakd.de) wrote:
> Or to put it this way: if you take the following things:
> - the unit file itself
> - all drop-ins
> - all .requires.d/
> - all .wants.d/
> you could combine them (according to precedence rules) to a single large
> unit fil
On Tue, 27.01.15 15:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> Yes, I think attempting any kind of dependency removal *from loaded
> units* would be very complicated, and would require major surgery to
> current unit engine. And things would become conceptually more complicated,
On 27 January 2015 at 16:47, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 03:50:49PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> On 27 January 2015 at 15:18, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> > Am 27.01.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>> >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:36:41PM
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 03:50:49PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 27 January 2015 at 15:18, Christian Seiler wrote:
> > Am 27.01.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:36:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >>> Dependencies are always additiv
On 27 January 2015 at 15:18, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Am 27.01.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:36:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> Dependencies are always additive and coalescing currently. We don't
>>> track which configuration file or au
Am 27.01.2015 um 15:45 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:36:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Dependencies are always additive and coalescing currently. We don't
>> track which configuration file or automatic logic created which
>> dependency, and hence it is
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:36:41PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 22.01.15 13:54, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
> wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to remove / override wants that are specified via
> > .wants directory, .d snippet with "Wants=", or wants specified in the
On 27 January 2015 at 12:42, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 22.01.15 15:16, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
> wrote:
>
>> On 22 January 2015 at 14:46, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> > 2015-01-22 15:08 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov
>> > :
>> >> At the moment, I'm looking at packag
On 27 January 2015 at 12:38, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 22.01.15 14:08, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
> wrote:
>
>> > In any case, /etc overrides /run, so your example can never work.
>> >
>>
>> Oh, ok. But any combination of the two. E.g. for /etc to unwant from
>> /r
On Thu, 22.01.15 15:16, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
> On 22 January 2015 at 14:46, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > 2015-01-22 15:08 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov :
> >> At the moment, I'm looking at packaging symlinks in .wants directories
> >> under /usr and then allow to un
On Thu, 22.01.15 14:08, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
> > In any case, /etc overrides /run, so your example can never work.
> >
>
> Oh, ok. But any combination of the two. E.g. for /etc to unwant from
> /run then, or for /etc to unwant from /usr.
>
> At the moment, I'm
On Thu, 22.01.15 13:54, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
> Is there a way to remove / override wants that are specified via
> .wants directory, .d snippet with "Wants=", or wants specified in the
> unit itself?
Dependencies are always additive and coalescing currently. We d
On 23 January 2015 at 13:11, Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
> On 22 January 2015 at 16:32, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> В Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:46:26 +0100
>> Michael Biebl пишет:
>>
>> There was long discussion on this just recently.
>>
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-Novemb
On 22 January 2015 at 16:32, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:46:26 +0100
> Michael Biebl пишет:
>
>> 2015-01-22 15:08 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov :
>> > At the moment, I'm looking at packaging symlinks in .wants directories
>> > under /usr and then allow to uninstall such a pack
В Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:46:26 +0100
Michael Biebl пишет:
> 2015-01-22 15:08 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov :
> > At the moment, I'm looking at packaging symlinks in .wants directories
> > under /usr and then allow to uninstall such a package as a means to
> > override the default config. Since I wou
On 22 January 2015 at 14:46, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2015-01-22 15:08 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov :
>> At the moment, I'm looking at packaging symlinks in .wants directories
>> under /usr and then allow to uninstall such a package as a means to
>> override the default config. Since I would like t
2015-01-22 15:08 GMT+01:00 Dimitri John Ledkov :
> At the moment, I'm looking at packaging symlinks in .wants directories
> under /usr and then allow to uninstall such a package as a means to
> override the default config. Since I would like to update how the
> default config is setup, without doin
On 22 January 2015 at 14:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:54:37PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> Is there a way to remove / override wants that are specified via
>> .wants directory, .d snippet with "Wants=", or wants specified in the
>> unit itself?
>>
>>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:54:37PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Is there a way to remove / override wants that are specified via
> .wants directory, .d snippet with "Wants=", or wants specified in the
> unit itself?
>
> I thought that creating a symlink to /dev/null from a higher up
> direc
Is there a way to remove / override wants that are specified via
.wants directory, .d snippet with "Wants=", or wants specified in the
unit itself?
I thought that creating a symlink to /dev/null from a higher up
directory would disable wants dependency but it didn't:
e.g.:
I was expecting for
/ru
22 matches
Mail list logo
