BOn Tue, 26.05.15 16:58, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> > 50 non-backport patches? That sounds like a lot...
>
> It's not that bad, most of them are trivial, like tweaking tmpfiles.d
> or some extra historic udev rules. We have quite a bunch of patches to
> get rid of Fedora/RedHat
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 16:43 +0200]:
> Well, I had been trying to stabilize things since 3 weeks before the
> release
Ah, that's roughly when I did my last "build packages from upstream
trunk" test, and indeed it looked fairly well back then.
> I didn't announce this on the ML though, but
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:26, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Dimitri John Ledkov [2015-05-26 15:12 +0100]:
> > Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
>
> Can we perhaps flip that around? I did a make dist/port our
> patches/build packackages/run o
Hello all,
Dimitri John Ledkov [2015-05-26 15:12 +0100]:
> Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Can we perhaps flip that around? I did a make dist/port our
patches/build packackages/run our tests round on May 11, but that was
before most of the recent "hiccups" landed i