On Sat, 02.02.13 15:24, Sébastien Luttringer (se...@seblu.net) wrote:
Hello,
Looking forward to mount custom partitions I decided to use unit.mount
files to define my new fs. Everything works perfectly, so I tried to
do the same with all my mounted filesystems and removing /etc/fstab.
I am
Am 04.02.2013 10:18, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Sat, 02.02.13 15:24, Sébastien Luttringer (se...@seblu.net) wrote:
Hello,
Looking forward to mount custom partitions I decided to use unit.mount
files to define my new fs. Everything works perfectly, so I tried to
do the same with all
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
We actually care about readability of the sources and non-Linux systems
are out-of-focus for us. Can you tell me which Linux system has
sizeof(void*) != sizeof(char*)? Otherwise, I only see this as pointless
[and the crowd goes wild!]
Thanks for this work. I've also had a few bug reports about this one.
'Twas brillig, and Michal Sekletar at 02/02/13 09:10 did gyre and gimble:
thank you very much for the review, it is very appreciated. I've sent
out the patch to get a feedback on a general
On Feb 4, 2013 10:31 AM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net
wrote:
On Fri, 01.02.13 12:50, Jake Edge (j...@lwn.net) wrote:
[ OK, let's try this again ... since I'm impatient about it sitting in
the moderator queue, I went ahead and joined up ]
Hi Lennart (and the rest of the
On Feb 4, 2013 1:36 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Feb 4, 2013 10:31 AM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net
wrote:
On Fri, 01.02.13 12:50, Jake Edge (j...@lwn.net) wrote:
[ OK, let's try this again ... since I'm impatient about it sitting in
the moderator queue, I
Hi,
can you check if it works with the following test case?
For me it doesn't, and I think there must be a bug.
Zbyszek
Hi Zbigniew,
sorry for a responding on my initial email, but for some reason your
response[1] did not appear in my mailbox. Anyway your test have raised
an interesting
.mount units coming from /proc/self/mountinfo file are
unmounted after local-fs.target is reached during shutdown.
Problem: .mount units popping up in mountinfo file are
added to systemd without any dependency. For that reason,
they are the first one to be unmounted during shutdown.
Whichever
Only set source for freshly created .mounts coming from
mountinfo file.
---
src/core/mount.c | 12 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/mount.c b/src/core/mount.c
index 29ce440..8231059 100644
--- a/src/core/mount.c
+++ b/src/core/mount.c
@@
Downside of this patch is, mountinfo mounts stick around as inactive-dead
even when the file system they represent is unmounted.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Umut Tezduyar u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
.mount units coming from /proc/self/mountinfo file are
unmounted after local-fs.target is
---
src/journal/coredump.c | 9 ++---
src/shared/logs-show.c | 18 +++---
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/coredump.c b/src/journal/coredump.c
index c989be9..91528d3 100644
--- a/src/journal/coredump.c
+++ b/src/journal/coredump.c
@@
---
src/journal/coredump.c | 28 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/coredump.c b/src/journal/coredump.c
index 91528d3..4f79c45 100644
--- a/src/journal/coredump.c
+++ b/src/journal/coredump.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include log.h
Thanks again! I have completely missed this new feature of ssh.
On 2/3/13, Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Igor Bukanov i...@mir2.org wrote:
On 29 January 2013 00:25, Mantas Mikulėnas graw...@gmail.com wrote:
systemd only handles accepting
I can't find a reason why we shouldn't try to output messages for other
unit types than .service, .socket, .mount and .swap as well. It's probably
a leftover from before we started logging UNIT= from inside PID 1.
---
src/shared/logs-show.c | 11 ---
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff
Written by Peeters Simon peeters.si...@gmail.com. Makefile stuff
and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok auke-jan.h@intel.com.
---
Makefile.am| 21 +-
src/analyze/systemd-analyze.c | 575 +
src/analyze/systemd-analyze.in | 328
Returning IPv6 link-local addresses is a bad idea, because they only
work if an application connects specifically over the corresponding
interface. So you get errors like:
$ curl -6 http://my-machine/
curl: (7) Failed to connect to fe80::d6be:d9ff:fe1b:8477: Invalid argument
To prevent
Nscd expects that an NSS module's gethostbyname4_r function returns
its first result in the pre-allocated gaih_addrtuple denoted by **pat.
(See nscd/aicache.c in the Glibc sources.) However, nss-myhostname
doesn't fill in **pat but allocates the first result in ‘buffer’, then
sets *pat. So nscd
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Eelco Dolstra
eelco.dols...@logicblox.com wrote:
Returning IPv6 link-local addresses is a bad idea, because they only
work if an application connects specifically over the corresponding
interface. So you get errors like:
$ curl -6 http://my-machine/
curl:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:56:25PM +0100, Eelco Dolstra wrote:
Returning IPv6 link-local addresses is a bad idea, because they only
work if an application connects specifically over the corresponding
interface.
Isn't this a responsibility of the application to deal with that?
So you get
Le lundi 04 février 2013 à 16:23 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a
écrit :
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:03:59PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar wrote:
Downside of this patch is, mountinfo mounts stick around as inactive-dead
even when the file system they represent is unmounted.
On Mon,
Hi,
On 04/02/13 16:36, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
In other words, the scope ID is filled in correctly when I request
AF_UNSPEC, but it's empty for AF_INET6.
Hm, interesting. I see now that curl without -6 does connect correctly to the
link-local address, so the failure with -6 is probably
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:13:25PM +0100, Mirco Tischler wrote:
---
src/journal/coredump.c | 28 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/coredump.c b/src/journal/coredump.c
index 91528d3..4f79c45 100644
---
On 04/02/13 05:13, David Strauss wrote:
I second the interest in committing this to the existing Python
support once polished.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
Hi,
I've been
On Mon, 04.02.13 11:37, Michał Bartoszkiewicz (mbartoszkiew...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
We actually care about readability of the sources and non-Linux systems
are out-of-focus for us. Can you tell me which Linux
'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 16/01/13 20:55 did
gyre and gimble:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:33:22PM +0100, Holger Winkelmann wrote:
Can't speak from person experience, but my team has worked with the libevent
and
libev libraries which contain http libraries as well.
Written by Peeters Simon peeters.si...@gmail.com. Makefile stuff
and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok auke-jan.h@intel.com.
---
Fixed some stuff and dit some more cleanup.
This should just cover the same usage as the old systemd-analyze, but we can
add more functionality afterwards (systemctl
On Sat, 02.02.13 14:17, Arthur Taylor (a...@ified.ca) wrote:
Hello systemd developers
TL;DR: On a VT which X is running, messing with KDSKBMODE on
underneath X at best has no affect and at worst breaks keyboard input
badly. In the short term, systemd should stop calling this ioctl
because
On Fri, 01.02.13 13:20, Umut Tezduyar (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
As of 3cdebc217c42c8529086f2965319b6a48eaaeabe support for
distro specific boot up runlevels has been dropped.
Thanks!
Applied!
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
___
Am 04.02.2013 22:33, schrieb Peeters Simon:
2013/2/4 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Mon, 04.02.13 21:32, Simon Peeters (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
Written by Peeters Simon peeters.si...@gmail.com. Makefile stuff
and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok auke-jan.h@intel.com.
On 4 February 2013 22:33, Peeters Simon peeters.si...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/4 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Mon, 04.02.13 21:32, Simon Peeters (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
Written by Peeters Simon peeters.si...@gmail.com. Makefile stuff
and cleaned up a bit by Auke
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Peeters Simon peeters.si...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/4 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Mon, 04.02.13 21:32, Simon Peeters (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
Written by Peeters Simon peeters.si...@gmail.com. Makefile stuff
and cleaned up a bit by Auke
Am 04.02.2013 22:47, schrieb Kok:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 04.02.2013 22:33, schrieb Peeters Simon:
2013/2/4 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Mon, 04.02.13 21:32, Simon Peeters (peeters.si...@gmail.com) wrote:
Written by
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 01:54:56PM -0800, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Ok, here's a first patch that helps my build:
as of today I need this patch to make my compiles (source-based
distro) actully succeed, otherwise
On 04/02/13 18:30, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 04/02/13 05:13, David Strauss wrote:
I second the interest in committing this to the existing Python
support once polished.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM
On Thu, 31.01.13 00:07, Dave (d...@flex.com.au) wrote:
Hi. I'm not on the maillist, but I recently read that systemd was planning
to introduce an integrated job scheduler, if it isn't done already.
If so, then it would be very handy to introduce a way to run scheduled jobs
at the end of
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 01:54:56PM -0800, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Ok, here's a first patch that helps my build:
as of today I need this
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:32:33PM +0100, Simon Peeters wrote:
Written by Peeters Simon peeters.si...@gmail.com. Makefile stuff
and cleaned up a bit by Auke Kok auke-jan.h@intel.com.
---
Fixed some stuff and dit some more cleanup.
This should just cover the same usage as the old
2013/2/5 William Giokas 1007...@gmail.com:
Thanks! It applied cleanly. Just a comment in the analyze_plot fucntion.
Previously I mentioned that really short boot times make plots that are
too small to really read anything, and I kept getting graphs that were
trunctated and short, basically
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:47:05PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 31.01.13 00:07, Dave (d...@flex.com.au) wrote:
Hi. I'm not on the maillist, but I recently read that systemd was planning
to introduce an integrated job scheduler, if it isn't done already.
If so, then it
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Arthur Taylor a...@ified.ca wrote:
KDSKBMODE is a virtual console ioctl which changes the current mode
of the virtual console keyboard for that particular virtual terminal.
That is, the virtual console keyboard mode, like the keymap, is a
per-virtual terminal
2013/2/4 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:13:25PM +0100, Mirco Tischler wrote:
---
src/journal/coredump.c | 28 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/coredump.c
---
src/journal/coredump.c | 41 ++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/coredump.c b/src/journal/coredump.c
index 91528d3..021b4c6 100644
--- a/src/journal/coredump.c
+++ b/src/journal/coredump.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
On 4 Feb 2013, at 4:20 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Suggestions what we could do instead?
2012-02-:4 maybe?
2012-02-~4?
This one looks nice.
What about 2012-02~4 (leave off the -)? Thus, - implies day (days from
the start) of the month, ~ implies days from the end of the
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 08:40:22PM +0200, Oleksii Shevchuk wrote:
Current one:
- If StopWhenUnneeded=yes and RequiredBy=, WantedBy=, BoundBy= empty
Then stop unit.
The side effect is:
- If user starts unit, that not wanted by any started target, then unit
will be immediately
In the year 2013, of the month of February, on the 4th day, Larry Baker wrote:
What about 2012-02~4 (leave off the -)? Thus, - implies day (days
from the start) of the month, ~ implies days from the end of the month.
Nice. I like this one. Simple, neat, and feels right. The tilde is
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:58:30AM +, Colin Guthrie wrote:
[and the crowd goes wild!]
Thanks for this work. I've also had a few bug reports about this one.
'Twas brillig, and Michal Sekletar at 02/02/13 09:10 did gyre and gimble:
thank you very much for the review, it is very
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Dave d...@flex.com.au wrote:
In the year 2013, of the month of February, on the 4th day, Larry Baker
wrote:
What about 2012-02~4 (leave off the -)? Thus, - implies day (days
from the start) of the month, ~ implies days from the end of the month.
Nice. I
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've made the suggested changes and pushed it to github. Feedback
welcomed :)
Thanks!
Some more thoughts on the API below. Some of those are probably
stupid, but I want to throw them out in the open, for your feedback.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:21:27PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Using -Wl,--gc-sections helps a lot, but still. We could just put it in
a private path like /usr/lib/systemd/libsystemd-shared.so.
I have been wanting to do something like that for a long while.
I thought it would be much more
49 matches
Mail list logo