On Fri, 13.03.15 12:25, Michael Marineau (michael.marin...@coreos.com) wrote:
Greetings,
Currently systemd-timesyncd.service includes
ConditionVirtualization=no, disabling it in both containers and
virtual machines. Each VM platform tends to deal with or ignore the
time problem in their
On Thu, 09.04.15 15:20, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote:
+quotes = chars_intersect(service, SHELL_NEED_QUOTES);
+
+service_maybe_quoted = alloca(strlen(service) + 3);
+sprintf(service_maybe_quoted, %s%s%s, quotes ? ' : ,
service, quotes ? ' : );
I have
On 08/04/15 20:11, Kay Sievers wrote:
Right, we have to find out what we want to support here, cross-compile
or secondary arch things.
Only one thing is clear at the moment, that the current status makes
no sense. :)
We got $libdir for the secondary arch:
I think I get it now. I have two interfaces that have different DNS
servers set -- bond0 and br_lxc. All of the LXC containers use my
router's DNS and everything else uses 127.0.2.1 . The config file for
the br_lxc interface looks like this:
[Match]
Name=br_lxc
[Network]
Description=LXC bridge
On 04/09/2015 11:04 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 09.04.15 10:51, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
My above questions where directed directly at Lennart since you cannot know
if Lennart's assumption which he bases his decisions on are
premature,correct, wrong or
On Wed, 18.03.15 17:10, Christoph Pleger (christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de)
wrote:
Warming up this old thread...
Why does systemd not follow the above instructions to start the services
of test.target after those of basic.target and before those of
multi-user.target?
I figure this trhead
On 04/09/2015 02:02 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 18.03.15 11:00, Susant Sahani (sus...@redhat.com) wrote:
Sorry for the late review!
Thanks for the review .
+paracommandsystemd-journal-syslogd/command serves journal
+events over the network. It multicasts journal event
This tiny daemon enables to pull journal entries and push to a UDP
multicast address in syslog RFC 5424 format. systemd-journal-syslogd
runs with own user systemd-journal-syslog. It starts running after
the network is up.
V2: Address Zbigniew's comments
1. Rename binary
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 16.03.15 11:29, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
I would like to pass the time it was spent in bootloader to systemd.
Is there a kernel command line to pass this information on non EFI
On 04/09/2015 08:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Of course, this only works for GPT systems, i.e. modern systems, and
modern systems probably wouldn't run ext234 anyway, so maybe it's not
worth it... Actually neither xfs nor btrfs nor reiserfs appear to
require an fsck still, it's only ext234
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
order it after the precise units you need from early boot,
This is fragile because it will break every time precise units
change. This is exact reason why we have systemd.special man page at
all - to provide high
Hi!
On 09/04/15 12:45, Patrik Flykt wrote:
Hmm, in general, we really should try to create the same binaries,
regardless if we are built on an old or new kernel. And the binaries
should work as good as possible, regardless which kernel version they
are running on. But with the change above
On Mon, 16.03.15 11:29, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
I would like to pass the time it was spent in bootloader to systemd.
Is there a kernel command line to pass this information on non EFI
bootloader? Or is there an another way?
I am open to add this, but I really
On Wed, 18.03.15 11:00, Susant Sahani (sus...@redhat.com) wrote:
Sorry for the late review!
+paracommandsystemd-journal-syslogd/command serves journal
+events over the network. It multicasts journal event to Syslog RFC 5424
format.
+/para
The tool can also be used to unicast
Am 09.04.2015 um 12:17 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 04/09/2015 08:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Of course, this only works for GPT systems, i.e. modern systems, and
modern systems probably wouldn't run ext234 anyway, so maybe it's not
worth it... Actually neither xfs nor btrfs nor
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:35:53PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:10:14PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
Users might have hard time figuring out why exactly their systemctl
request
Hi Lennart,
that does sound interesting. Let me polish my patches for stateless
systems on real hardware a bit first though:-) It would give a
horrible impression if the system would not come up properly, just
because you forgot to pass root= to the kernel. Sorry for the delay, I
was on vacation
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:44:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:35:53PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:10:14PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
Hi Systemd devs :
We have some scripts that depend on the kernel printing Restarting
system. when a reboot command is issued on the console.
Unfortunately we are not seeing such a message just before reboot. It
seems that the reboot() syscall is not even getting invoked by
start_special(). Do you
On Thu, 09.04.15 13:37, Patrik Flykt (patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
src/libsystemd/sd-rtnl/rtnl-types.c | 2 ++
src/network/networkd-address.c | 5 +++-
src/network/networkd-dhcp6.c| 55
+++--
src/network/networkd-link.c | 4
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 01:13:23PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 15.03.15 17:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
(zbys...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
diff --git a/src/vconsole/vconsole-setup.c b/src/vconsole/vconsole-setup.c
index bf681d9..fe8573f 100644
---
On 04/09/2015 10:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.04.2015 um 12:17 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 04/09/2015 08:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Of course, this only works for GPT systems, i.e. modern systems, and
modern systems probably wouldn't run ext234 anyway, so maybe it's not
Am 09.04.2015 um 19:05 schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 09.04.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not
On Sun, 15.03.15 21:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
So this used to to be possible for ext4, by setting mount count one
below the mount limit. But mount limit now defaults to disabled, so
this stopped being possible.
Also, this suffers from the same problem that
When setting IPv6 addresses acquired by DHCPv6, systemd-networkd sets
the IFA_F_NOPREFIXROUTE flag in the IFA_FLAGS netlink attribute. As the
flag and the attribute are present starting with Linux 3.14, older
kernels will need systemd-network to manage prefix route handling.
Support for IFA_FLAGS
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
Users might have hard time figuring out why exactly their systemctl request
failed. If dbus job fails try to figure out more details about failure by
examining Result property of the service.
On Sun, 15.03.15 17:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
(zbys...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote:
diff --git a/src/vconsole/vconsole-setup.c b/src/vconsole/vconsole-setup.c
index bf681d9..fe8573f 100644
--- a/src/vconsole/vconsole-setup.c
+++ b/src/vconsole/vconsole-setup.c
@@ -96,16 +96,14 @@
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:10:14PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
Users might have hard time figuring out why exactly their systemctl request
failed. If dbus job fails try to figure out more details about failure by
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:47:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
What I'm proposing is that we dropped that proof of concept since
it's not being maintained, there exist better alternatives thus it's
intended
On Sat, 14.03.15 09:14, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
Dear systemd folks,
using Debian Sid/unstable with systemd 215-12, I attached to it with GDB
to analyze some things. Attached with `gdb --pid 1` worked.
But continuing the execution and then hitting Ctrl + c
On Thu, 09.04.15 14:52, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
I know, this is very strange and seems not cool. And maybe the
activation will really slow. But seems not impossible.
Well, if something is ugly, then this is often a hint that it might
not be thought to the end, or might
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not for the
past. A file system like ext234 is clearly not the future,
A filesystem like ext is being actively developed,maintained and new
features being
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 05:20:43PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:44:38PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:35:53PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:10:14PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 02:10:14PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
Users might have hard time figuring out why exactly their systemctl request
failed. If dbus job fails try to figure out more details about failure by
On Thu, 09.04.15 12:26, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
order it after the precise units you need from early boot,
This is fragile because it will break every time precise units
change. This is
On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 12:43 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, in general, we really should try to create the same binaries,
regardless if we are built on an old or new kernel. And the binaries
should work as good as possible, regardless which kernel version they
are running on. But with
Users might have hard time figuring out why exactly their systemctl request
failed. If dbus job fails try to figure out more details about failure by
examining Result property of the service.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016680
---
src/libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-util.c | 41
On Thu, 09.04.15 14:10, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote:
In recent systemd(from some month ago), when a unit has a mask for cpu
or blockio or memory, this mask is also propagated to siblings by
unit_get_target_mask().
According to some of comments, it seems intentional.
Am 09.04.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not for the
past. A file system like ext234 is clearly not the future,
A filesystem like ext is being actively
I usually have two network interfaces on my laptops (one eth and one
wlan), and when I was using sysvinit I also was configuring the bond
interface via the /etc/network/interfaces file so the two interfaces
could work in the active-backup mode. But now, they work in balance-rr
mode which is set
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 09.04.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not for the
past. A file system
Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering.net writes:
On Mon, 06.01.14 11:04, Holger Schurig (holgerschurig at gmail.com) wrote:
Hi, I used ip netns commands to setup several network namespaces.
Now I want to run a user-space (non-root) in one of those netspaces.
ip netns exec NAME
On Thu, 09.04.15 10:51, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
My above questions where directed directly at Lennart since you cannot know
if Lennart's assumption which he bases his decisions on are
premature,correct, wrong or misguided until you know what those assumptions
are.
43 matches
Mail list logo
