[systemd-devel] Startup single step

2019-07-02 Thread Jay Burger
Hi, I am curious if there is a way to single step through the systemd startup of services? I don't find any such feature and am curious what others would think of it. We had a similar feature in a previous life, different OS, and developers seemed to like it. I personally think it was a handy to

Re: [systemd-devel] Startup single step

2019-07-04 Thread Jay Burger
you wait to respond to the prompt. Thanks again, -Jay On 07/03/2019 06:23 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Di, 02.07.19 12:30, Jay Burger (jay.bur...@us.fujitsu.com) wrote: Hi, I am curious if there is a way to single step through the systemd startup of services? So this exists, in theory in

[systemd-devel] Shutdown behavior

2020-01-10 Thread Jay Burger
Hi, I have a couple of questions regarding systemd shutdown behavior. I first noticed this behavior using systemd v213, I am now on v232 and see the same problem. I found a fix in 213 and patched the service.c module, in 232 the change needed to move to the emergency-action.c module. The problem

Re: [systemd-devel] Shutdown behavior

2020-01-13 Thread Jay Burger
t=US-ASCII On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:32:37 +0100 Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fr, 10.01.20 10:56, Jay Burger (jay.bur...@us.fujitsu.com) wrote: I made the same type of change in the emergency_action() function in v232. Question 1: Would this be considered a problem with the design, needing an

Re: [systemd-devel] Shutdown Behavior

2020-01-14 Thread Jay Burger
Jay Burger schrieb am 13.01.2020 um 17:36 in Nachricht <9f4dc083-18f7-ba68-cc96-1d3c9492e...@us.fujitsu.com>: ... Personally, I would think the initial shutdown should always be honored. Unrealistic dramatized example: I have another emergency at Chernobyl and need to power down my r

[systemd-devel] Port 231 security patch to 213

2016-10-24 Thread Jay Burger
Hi, I need some help porting the security patch released in version 231 back to version 213. If this is not the correct place for this question can someone point me to the proper forum? Updating my system from 213 to 231 is not an option for me at this time. If anyone knows if this has been done

Re: [systemd-devel] Port 231 security patch to 213

2016-10-24 Thread Jay Burger
ode/121052/ This claims the problem began is version 209. I found the systemd-231-security_fix-1.patch on this page but am not sure if it applies. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/systemd/ Thanks for your help. -Jay On 10/24/16 11:11, Christian Hesse wrote: Jay Burger on Mon,

Re: [systemd-devel] Port 231 security patch to 213

2016-10-24 Thread Jay Burger
Christian, Found the fix here: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/4240 This seems to work, I no longer have an issue even with the endless loop option used to create the problem. -Jay On 10/24/16 11:11, Christian Hesse wrote: Jay Burger on Mon, 2016/10/24 10:54: Hi, I need some help

[systemd-devel] systemd-211 patch for FailureAction

2015-11-13 Thread Jay Burger
Hi, I am a complete newbie to this list and I am trying to find out if I can patch my systemd-211 to include the FailureAction feature. If so where can I obtain the patche(s)? We are using the yocto daisy distribution which has systemd-211 and due to silly process restrictions getting the dizzy

[systemd-devel] systemd shutdown behavior

2016-02-13 Thread Jay Burger
Hi, I have a general question concerning systemd's behavior during systemctl reboot, halt or poweroff. As the system is in the process of shutting down, I am wondering if a service fails during the shutdown process does systemd still honor the restart/reboot behavior defined in that programs ser