On Do, 09.05.19 12:22, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I had to subscribe to this list, even though I'm no systemd
> fan. Still I'll have to deal with it as the distribution we use
> switched to systemd...
Fantastic lead-in. This is a perfect intro if you are
09.05.2019 13:22, Ulrich Windl пишет:
> Hi!
>
> I had to subscribe to this list, even though I'm no systemd fan. Still I'll
> have to deal with it as the distribution we use switched to systemd...
>
> I'm porting my LSB code to systemd, and I'm having some trouble. Cause of the
> trouble (and
Hi
Am Do., 9. Mai 2019 um 12:22 Uhr schrieb Ulrich Windl
:
> Despite of that I'm missing a "systemctl validate ..." command. That way I
> wouldn't need to execute start, status, stop, just to find out that some
> settings are rejected.
There is "systemd-analyze verify".
--
Why is it that
Hi!
I had to subscribe to this list, even though I'm no systemd fan. Still I'll
have to deal with it as the distribution we use switched to systemd...
I'm porting my LSB code to systemd, and I'm having some trouble. Cause of the
trouble (and possible reason for systemd's unpopularity) seems to
