Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] bus: fix duplicate comparisons
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Tero Roponen tero.ropo...@gmail.com wrote: Testing for y x is the same as testing for x y. -if (y x) +if (x y) snip I thing you forgot to change the signs ;) ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] bus: fix duplicate comparisons
On 10/10/13 12:38, Carlos Silva wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Tero Roponen tero.ropo...@gmail.com wrote: Testing for y x is the same as testing for x y. -if (y x) +if (x y) snip I thing you forgot to change the signs ;) No, I believe that was the point of the patch. The two tests were the same, first testing (x y), and then (y x). Now it then properly tests for (x y) -j ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] bus: fix duplicate comparisons
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Olivier Brunel j...@jjacky.com wrote: No, I believe that was the point of the patch. The two tests were the same, first testing (x y), and then (y x). Now it then properly tests for (x y) Totally didn't read the context of the code, just the changes and the patch comment. Sorry about that :-/ ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] bus: fix duplicate comparisons
On Thu, 10.10.13 08:14, Tero Roponen (tero.ropo...@gmail.com) wrote: Testing for y x is the same as testing for x y. Thanks! Applied! Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
