t-and-f: NYTimes.com Article: Show Us the Money

2003-08-01 Thread francicash
This article from NYTimes.com 
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]


/ advertisement ---\

Explore more of Starbucks at Starbucks.com.
http://www.starbucks.com/default.asp?ci=1015
\--/

Show Us the Money

August 1, 2003
 By JEREMY BLOOM 




 

BOULDER, Colo. 
When I was a kid, I remember my parents telling me that
going to college would broaden my horizons and give me all
the opportunities in the world. What I've found out,
though, is that the benefits of being a student become
clouded when you add the word athlete. That's because the
National Collegiate Athletic Association not only rules
college athletics, it also limits the opportunities of the
360,000 student-athletes it purports to serve. 

The N.C.A.A. was formed a century ago to establish rules
for intercollegiate competition, and it did an admirable
job. Today, however, it has become a multibillion-dollar
organization that holds a monopoly on college athletics.
Much of the television royalties and other revenue of
college athletics go directly to the N.C.A.A., which
distributes the money as it sees fit to its 1,200 member
institutions. As the organization has smoothly adapted to
the big-money era of college athletics, it has kept the
student-athletes themselves from benefiting from the
changes. 

Division I basketball players, for example, won't receive a
dime of the $6 billion deal that the N.C.A.A. has made with
CBS for the rights to broadcast its national tournament.
And not only do the student-athletes not share in this
wealth, the N.C.A.A. has plenty of rules to keep us from
making money on our own. 

It prohibits us from having sponsors or appearing in
advertisements, even if the products have no relation to
the intercollegiate sports we play. In my case, to be
allowed to play wide receiver for the University of
Colorado football team, I had to give up endorsement
opportunities I had garnered as an Olympic moguls skier. 

Or consider the plight of Aaron Adair, a third baseman for
the University of Oklahoma who also happens to have
survived brain cancer. He wrote a book about his recovery
intended to help others with the disease, only to receive a
call from a compliance officer informing him that his
college baseball career was over because his name was
attached to a corporate product. 

When I voice my complaints, the usual response I hear is:
The N.C.A.A. provides a free college education for these
kids and that should be enough. I address that question in
two parts. First, free? We football players get up at
dawn, do an hour of wind sprints, go to classes, spend two
hours in the weight room, devote a of couple hours to
seven-on-seven drills, study for school, and try to have
something of a social life. And this is our off-season -
the hours only increase after the games start. Even if you
consider the scholarships we receive to be payment, we
are recompensed at far less than the minimum wage. 

Second, the N.C.A.A. doesn't pay for athletic scholarships,
the universities do. Many universities rely on wealthy
alumni who create endowments to cover tuition, room and
board. 

My solution? I have drafted what I call the
Student-Athletes' Bill of Rights and have sent copies to
state legislators across the country. Among other things,
my proposal would allow student-athletes to secure bona
fide employment not associated with his/her amateur sport
and collect money generated by the sale of apparel that
bears their names and jersey numbers. At the very least
this will help student-athletes cover school-related costs,
like travel and books, over and above what their
scholarships pay for. Also, because the N.C.A.A. doesn't
allow universities to cover a student-athlete's health
insurance during the summer, the bill would assure
student-athletes a full-time policy. It would also help
financially burdened family members travel to post-season
tournaments. 

I am not alone in this. Kevin Murray, a California state
senator, has introduced a bill along these lines to apply
to all universities in his state. The athletic director at
Stanford called the bill onerous and warned that if it
passed, every athlete in California would be ineligible
under N.C.A.A. guidelines. 

But that's exactly the point: if states start ensuring that
us student-athletes received fair treatment, would the
N.C.A.A. really ban us all? I doubt it - I bet the
organization would understand that its reign was in
jeopardy and come to the bargaining table. 

Responding to my initiative, an N.C.A.A. spokesman pointed
out that the organization gives 94 percent of every dollar
it receives to the universities, where it supposedly
trickles back to student-athletes. I'm curious about where
that other 6 percent goes - after all, 6 percent of the
basketball tournament contract alone is $360 million. 

He might also have explained the television commercials
made for the N.C.A.A. I see lots of ads 

Re: t-and-f: What is a professional sport

2003-08-23 Thread FranciCash
Yes indeed, you only need to look at Tennis's Kurnachova SP? to see what one with 
limited talent can do to attract the attention of the press.

Maybe Allen Johnson needs to wear more provocative outfits??

Stella Franci



t-and-f: Fwd: [Oztrack] DQ Farce in Paris Men's 100

2003-08-26 Thread FranciCash
An interesting point of view!!
Hi Sam
Sometime people in high places who set the rules to suit TV coverage and
not athletes - are too pompous and have limited hearing of public sentiment
from athletes and then the only way to show them how bad something is, to
get public attention attracted to an unfair situation. John Drummond I
believe did all Sprinters a favour in a much more powerful way than anyone
could ever have done by any reasonable representation petition or otherwise.


It is like marching in protest for something. I'll bet everyone would
believe in some cases something would be worth marching for. But ofcourse
most of us hate people marching when it effects us individually and we don't
care about the issue. 

The IAAF ought to consider how decent it is to modify the traditions of the
sport to suit TV coverage at the expense of fairness for athletes. If there
were many more people in the IAAF who would listen and realize that the
system as it stands is damaging to the sport. They would then realize that
their own rules have brough the sport into disrepute and not John Drummond.
The moment the world sees that fact that John actually got out slower than
the guy next to him they realize that the system as it stand is pathetically
flawed.

Sometime doing a sit in is the only way. He did all sprinters a favour. If
this now leads to a rule change - we can call it the John Drummond amendment
because that is how the world works sadly. That's politics and this is
political. TV vs Athletes.

My 3c 
---BeginMessage---
Hi Sam
 Sometime people in high places who set the rules to suit TV coverage and
not athletes - are too pompous and have limited hearing of public sentiment
from athletes and then the only way to show them how bad something is, to
get public attention attracted to an unfair situation. John Drummond I
believe did all Sprinters a favour in a much more powerful way than anyone
could ever have done by any reasonable representation petition or otherwise.


It is like marching in protest for something. I'll bet everyone would
believe in some cases something would be worth marching for. But ofcourse
most of us hate people marching when it effects us individually and we don't
care about the issue. 

The IAAF ought to consider how decent it is to modify the traditions of the
sport to suit TV coverage at the expense of fairness for athletes. If there
were many more people in the IAAF who would listen and realize that the
system as it stands is damaging to the sport. They would then realize that
their own rules have brough the sport into disrepute and not John Drummond.
The moment the world sees that fact that John actually got out slower than
the guy next to him they realize that the system as it stand is pathetically
flawed.

Sometime doing a sit in is the only way. He did all sprinters a favour. If
this now leads to a rule change - we can call it the John Drummond amendment
because that is how the world works sadly. That's politics and this is
political. TV vs Athletes.

My 3c 

regards
Steve Bennett
www.oztrack.com



-Original Message-
From: Sam Leitch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 26 August 2003 10:58 PM
To: jim leppik; Shane Roelofs; Darren Alomes - Macquarie Accounting
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Oztrack] DQ Farce in Paris Men's 100


Greetings, 

I don't care what the circumstances were. I'm a strong
believer in respecting an offical's decision
regardless of the situation. 

It has become a common scenario on the sporting field,
where athletes dispute an offical's decision. This
shouldn't be the case, regardless of the sport. 

I was interested to hear that an athlete should be
allowed to run the race, with the protest to be heard
later. This rule makes sense. In a laned event, such
as the 100m, it shouldn't matter whether an athlete is competing in the race
or not.

If this rule exists, it still doesn't allow Drummond
to behave the way he did. Respect must be given to the
officals and if he wishes to argue the point with the
IAAF, then delaying the 100m quarter final in the way
that he did, isn't the best way to do it. 

Thats my 2 cents worth! :)

Cheers, 

Sam.


--- jim leppik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi all,
  
 Interesting that the Powell took off before Drummond
 but had a much slower reaction time
  
 Jim
 
 
 
 Shane Roelofs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
 First of all I'd like to say a big CONGRATULATIONS
 to Justin Anelzark for
 his 5th in the Shot!!! Job well done!!!
 
 And now to the controversy with Jon Drummond. How
 can any reasonable person
 criticise his actions?!?! This guy has put in a
 tremendous amount of work
 to be in the shape he's in, to prepare for these championships and he 
 knew that as soon as he left the track it would all be
 academic. So he did his
 best to get the officials to see reason. I DOUBT
 anyone of you would have
 done differently and if you would have, then let me
 tell you that you
 wouldn't be standing in the 

t-and-f: IAAF Council Meeting Report

2003-08-28 Thread FranciCash
IAAF Council meets in Paris  agrees that race walkers will receive Special Awards 
for World Best Performances
Thursday 28 August 2003 
Paris - Council agreed that although the two World Bests set in the Mens 20km and 
50km during these World Championships can not yet be recognised as official IAAF World 
Records, the two athletes responsible for the marks, Jefferson Perez (ECU) and Robert 
Korzeniowski (POL) would receive awards of $100,000 each as a gesture of Fair Play. 
The presentations will be made in the Stade de France before the end of the 
Championships.

JON DRUMMOND AFFAIR

Council officially endorsed the decision of the Competition Director to disqualify Jon 
Drummond from taking further part in this competition, for behaviour likely to bring 
the sport into disrepute, following his refusal to accept a disqualification for a 
false start in the quarter finals of the 100m. Council now expects to receive a report 
after a full investigation into the behaviour of Drummond, and USATF Admin Officer 
Michael Cain who is alleged to have advised the athlete not to accept his 
disqualification, before the next Council Meeting on 22-23 November in Berlin.
Council also agreed that a clearly defined procedure needed to be established to avoid 
repetition of such incidents in future. Among the specific procedures that are being 
considered are to:

Remove the blocks immediately from the lane of a disqualified athlete;

Remove the disqualified athletes name from the onscreen start list (or add a 
dq)

Ensure that the announcers and in-stadium presenters are proactive in explaining the 
rules both before the event starts and when athletes are disqualified;

Ensure that the in-stadium screens  which are controlled by the Competition 
Organisers  do not show footage that is misleading or can incite the crowd;

Ask starters to use their discretion to avoid disqualifying more than one athlete at 
the same time, but aim to disqualify only the instigator of each false start.

Ask starters to warn flinchers who seek to provoke their rivals into making 
false starts, and to disqualify them if they do so repeatedly.

IAAF  USATF

Council discussed publication of an article in the LA Times revealing the identity of 
a US athlete who allegedly competed at the Sydney Olympics in 2000 after being cleared 
of a doping offence.
As is widely known, the IAAF sought disclosure from its US Member, USATF, of the names 
of a number of unidentified athletes, including the athlete from the Sydney Olympic 
Games, together with all related documents, as part of an arbitration procedure that 
was conducted before the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne in November 2002.  
In that case, the CAS Panel found that, although IAAF Rules required the disclosure of 
such information, there were valid reasons in the circumstances why disclosure should 
not now be made.   
The IAAF was never informed of the name of the Sydney athlete as the arbitration was 
concerned with the principle of disclosure not with establishing the individual 
identity of any athlete. 
The IAAF and USATF agreed prior to the arbitration that the CAS decision would be 
final and binding on both parties.  Accordingly, respecting the CAS decision, and in 
the absence of voluntary disclosure of the information or an admission by the athlete 
in question, the IAAF is not in a position to take any further action in the matter at 
this time.

 



t-and-f: 08/30/2003 - U.S. Sprinter White May Lose Gold Medal

2003-08-30 Thread FranciCash
08/30/2003  09:56:49 EST 
U.S. Sprinter White May Lose Gold Medal 
By STEPHEN WILSON 
AP Sports Writer 

American sprinter Kelli White could be stripped of at least one of her two gold medals 
from the World Championships after testing positive for a stimulant, the sport's 
governing body said Saturday.

The IAAF said it was investigating whether White committed a doping offense and should 
forfeit her victory Sunday in the 100 meters.

If it ends as a doping case - at the moment all indications are toward that direction 
- then she will be deprived of the gold medal, IAAF general secretary Istvan Gyulai 
told The Associated Press.

White's gold in Thursday's 200 meters could also be in jeopardy. In addition, she 
could face a two-year suspension if found guilty of a serious offense.

White, the first American to win both sprints at a world championship, couldn't be 
reached for comment. USA Track  Field officials had no comment.

White was scheduled to run in Saturday's 400-meter relay final, but it wasn't 
immediately known if she would compete.

Gyulai said White was eligible to run in the relay, but the entire U.S. relay team 
would be disqualified later if she is ruled guilty of doping.

It is risky for the Americans to make her run, he said.

The IAAF confirmed a report in the French sports daily L'Equipe that White's drug 
sample after the 100 final contained modafinil, described as a psychostimulant that 
stimulates the central nervous system and is often used to fight fatigue and 
sleepiness.

The results of her drug test after the 200 final was not yet known.

The IAAF said modafinil was not listed by name on the IOC and World Anti-Doping 
Agency's current list of banned substances but was considered a related substance.

It is very clear that it is a stimulant, but whether it is a soft stimulant or a 
strong stimulant is not clear and is being debated, Gyulai said.

If the drug is determined to be the softer variety, White would be disqualified from 
the 100 and given a public warning, Gyulai said. If it is considered a strong drug, 
she will also face a two-year ban from the sport, he said.

Gyulai said it was uncertain when the IAAF would make a final ruling.

The most appropriate course of action is to allow her to compete pending the 
completion of the necessary scientific and factual investigations, an IAAF statement 
said.

The IAAF said White told federation officials she has been taking the drug on 
prescription to treat narcolepsy, a sleep disorder that runs in her family.

Gyulai said White did not list the substance on her doping control form as required. 
White said she didn't do so because the substance wasn't on the banned list.

Why should I mention anything? Gyulai quoted her as saying.

Under IAAF rules, athletes must notify the federation in advance of any products they 
take for medical reasons. The IAAF grants waivers to athletes who use products on the 
banned list for legitimate therapeutic reasons.

It's not the first time White has been involved in a disputed drug test in France.

In July 2002, after running in a meet at Saint Denis, White's sample turned up traces 
of a corticoid - an anti-inflammatory steroid. She was suspended for six months by 
France's anti-doping agency because she lacked a medical certificate, but the IAAF 
cleared her of any offense.


 
Copyright 2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved 



t-and-f: Some Official Result - Memorial Van Damme - Bruxelles (BEL)Friday, September 05, 2003

2003-09-05 Thread FranciCash
Official Result
Men - 100 METRES 
Wind: +0.8 m/s  
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Powell Asafa JAM 10.02 
2   Gatlin Justin USA 10.09 
3   Williams Bernard USA 10.10 
4   Capel John USA 10.13 
5   Aliu Deji NGR 10.17 
6   Lewis-Francis Mark GBR 10.20 
7   Chambers Dwain GBR 10.22 
8   Boldon Ato TRI 10.26 
9   Emedolu Uchenna NGR 10.28 

Men - 400 METRES 
   
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   van Branteghem Cedric BEL 45.02 
2   Canal David ESP 45.64 
3   Laursen Jimisola SWE 45.74 
4   Sambu Ezra KEN 45.83 
5   Diagana Stphane FRA 45.85 
6   Swillims Bastian GER 46.14 
7   Barberi Andrea ITA 46.36 
8   de Baerdemaeker Xavier BEL 46.68 
9   Hedman Graham GBR 46.89 

Men - 800 METRES 
   
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Bungei Wilfred KEN 1:42.52 
2   Mulaudzi Mbulaeni RSA 1:42.89 
3   Sepeng Hezekil RSA 1:43.12 
4   Kipketer Wilson DEN 1:43.28 
5   Mutua Joseph KEN 1:43.52 
6   Borzakovskiy Yuriy RUS 1:43.68 
7   Bucher Andr SUI 1:44.23 
8   Som Bram NED 1:44.46 
9   Jansen Joeri BEL 1:45.07 
   Kiptoo David KEN DNF 

Men - 3000 METRES STEEPLECHASE 
   
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Shaheen Saif Saaeed QAT 8:00.06 
2   Koech Paul KEN 8:00.42 
3   Vroemen Simon NED 8:09.18 
4   Nyamu Julius KEN 8:10.33 
5   Kemboi Ezekiel KEN 8:12.87 
6   Ezzine Ali MAR 8:13.31 
7   Tahri Bouabdallah FRA 8:14.44 
8   El Ouardi Zouhair MAR 8:14.81 
9   Misoi Kipkirui KEN 8:17.27 
10   Boit Kipketer  Wilson KEN 8:17.86 
11   Martn Luis Miguel ESP 8:20.89 
12   Slattery Steve USA 8:24.99 
13   Cherono Abraham KEN 8:31.73 
14   Kipyego Michael KEN 8:32.93 
15   Buc Botjan SLO 8:38.64 
   Langat John KEN DNF 
   Cheruiyot Abel KEN DNS 

Women - 100 METRES 
Wind: -0.1 m/s  
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   White Kelli USA 10.87 
2   Gaines Chryste USA 10.88 
3   Edwards Torri USA 10.98 
4   Sturrup Chandra BAH 11.01 
5   Block Zhanna UKR 11.12 
6   Hurtis Muriel FRA 11.12 
7   Kislova Marina RUS 11.31 
8   Anim Vida GHA 11.32 
9   Maduaka Joice GBR 11.48 

Women - 5000 METRES 
   
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Tulu Derartu ETH 14:44.22 
2   Ochichi Isabella KEN 14:47.70 
3   Masai Edith KEN 15:06.64 
4   Joseph Restituta TAN 15:07.39 
5   El Kamch Zhor MAR 15:11.78 
6   Ouaziz Zahra MAR 15:13.14 
7   Kwambai Irene KEN 15:14.68 
8   Okninska Lidia POL 15:24.29 
9   Chenonge Ines KEN 15:35.04 
10   Javornik Helena SLO 15:37.98 
   Komyagina Olga RUS DNF 
   Turova Alesya BLR DNF 

Women - 400 METRES HURDLES 
   
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Pechonkina Yuliya RUS 53.49 
2   Glover Sandra USA 53.87 
3   Tirlea Ionela ROM 54.83 
4   Blackett Andrea BAR 54.85 
5   Tereschuk-Antipova Tetiana UKR 55.06 
6   Taylor Brenda USA 55.28 
7   Febbraio Surita RSA 55.57 
8   Torshina Natalya KAZ 55.91 
9   Danvers Natasha GBR 57.08 
 
Women - JAVELIN THROW 
   
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Shikolenko Tatyana RUS 61.36 
2   Nerius Steffi GER 60.68 
3   Szab Nikolett HUN 58.41 
4   Zabruskova Valeriya RUS 57.68 
5   Stas Cindy BEL 51.43 
6   Lewis Denise GBR 50.14 
   Kolkkala Taina FIN DNS 






t-and-f: More - Memorial Van Damme - Bruxelles (BEL)Friday, Sept 05, 2003

2003-09-05 Thread FranciCash
Memorial Van Damme - Bruxelles (BEL)Friday, September 05, 2003

  Official Result
Women - 1500 METRES 
   
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Ayhan Süreyya TUR 3:55.33 
2   Zadorozhnaya Yelena RUS 4:00.12 
3   Rozenberg Yekaterina RUS 4:00.58 
4   Maranga Jackline KEN 4:01.22 
5   Mugo Naomi KEN 4:01.80 
6   Yordanova Daniela BUL 4:01.83 
7   Babcock Courtney CAN 4:01.99 
8   Varga Judit HUN 4:02.67 
9   Yegorova Olga RUS 4:03.16 
10   Gorelova Natalya RUS 4:03.83 
11   Lishchynska Iryna UKR 4:05.26 
12   Tullett Hayley GBR 4:05.72 
13   Cioncan Maria ROM 4:11.47 
   Kosenkova Yuliya RUS DNF 
   Yevdokimova Natalya RUS DNF 

Men - 1500 METRES 
   
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   El Guerrouj Hicham MAR 3:28.40 
2   Baala Mehdi FRA 3:28.98 
3   Korir Paul KEN 3:30.72 
4   Rono Robert KEN 3:31.33 
5   Kipchirchir Alex KEN 3:31.42 
6   Higuero Juan Carlos ESP 3:31.61 
7   Kipkurui Benjamin KEN 3:32.58 
8   Shabunin Vyacheslav RUS 3:32.63 
9   Silva Rui POR 3:33.04 
10   Chirchir William KEN 3:33.61 
11   Chirchir Cornelius KEN 3:34.16 
12   Songok Isaac KEN 3:34.85 
13   Boukensa Tarek ALG 3:35.31 
14   Parra Roberto ESP 3:35.54 
15   Rotich Laban KEN 3:35.90 
16   Essaadi Ridouane BEL 3:44.09 
   Lelei David KEN DNF 
   Liefers Gert-Jan NED DNF 
   Whiteman Anthony GBR DNF 

Men - 110 METRES HURDLES 
Wind: +0.3 m/s  
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Johnson Allen USA 13.16 
2   Liu Xiang CHN 13.19 
3   Phillips Chris USA 13.29 
4   Trammell Terrence USA 13.39 
5   Bramlett Ron USA 13.69 
6   Inocêncio Mateus Facho BRA 13.70 
7   de Souza Márcio Simão BRA 13.90 
8   Ross Duane USA 14.03 
9   Wade Larry USA 15.17 







t-and-f: Resutls 3 - Memorial Van Damme - Bruxelles (BEL) Sept 05, 2003

2003-09-05 Thread FranciCash
Memorial Van Damme - Bruxelles (BEL)Friday, September 05, 2003

  Official Result
Men - 200 METRES 
Wind: -0.1 m/s  
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Gatlin Justin USA 20.04 
2   Williams Bernard USA 20.17 
3   Crawford Shawn USA 20.18 
4   Patton Darvis USA 20.30 
5   Brunson Marcus USA 20.55 
6   Williams Ricardo JAM 20.65 
7   Miller Coby USA 20.90 

Mark 
 
1   Gevaert Kim BEL 22.72 
2   Anim Vida GHA 22.90 
3   Ottey Merlene SLO 23.08 
4   Maduaka Joice GBR 23.10 
5   Mothersill Cydonie CAY 23.11 
6   Mayr-Krifka Karin AUT 23.17 
7   Hewitt Lauren AUS 23.22 
8   Adams Jenny USA 23.51 
9   Rochtus Audry BEL 23.83 

Men - JAVELIN THROW 
   
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Henry Boris GER 84.33 
2   Vrnik Andrus EST 82.78 
3   Blank Peter GER 82.26 
4   Nicolay Christian GER 81.43 
5   Thorkildsen Andreas NOR 80.41 
6   Trafas Dariusz POL 79.25 
7   Hecht Raymond GER 78.37 
8   Ivanov Alexandr RUS 77.74 

Men - 3000 METRES 
   
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Sadi-Sief Ali ALG 7:30.79 
2   Kipchoge Eliud KEN 7:30.91 
3   Kibowen John KEN 7:32.01 
4   Limo Benjamin KEN 7:33.13 
5   Kwalia James KEN 7:35.53 
6   Kipkosgei Luke KEN 7:37.64 
7   Chebii Abraham KEN 7:43.85 
8   Espaa Jess ESP 7:56.21 
9   Rizki Monder BEL 7:56.93 
10   Clerbout Tim BEL 7:59.97 
   Mayock John GBR DNF 
   Mutai Sammy KEN DNF 
   Khaldi Mohamed ALG DNS 

Men - POLE VAULT 
   
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Yurchenko Denys UKR 5.80 
2   Brits Okkert RSA 5.80 
3   Mesnil Romain FRA 5.70 
4   Markov Dmitri AUS 5.70 
5   Lobinger Tim GER 5.70 
5   Mack Timothy USA 5.70 
7   Duval Thibaut BEL 5.60 
7   Gibilisco Giuseppe ITA 5.60 
7   Hysong Nick USA 5.60 
10   Averbukh Aleksandr ISR 5.60 
   Brgeling Lars GER NM 
   Chistiakov Viktor AUS NM 
   Rans Kevin BEL NM 

Women - HIGH JUMP 
   
Pos   Athlete Nat Mark 
 
1   Cloete Hestrie RSA 2.03 
2   Styopina Viktoriya UKR 1.98 
3   Yelesina Yelena RUS 1.98 
4   Palamar Vita UKR 1.98 
4   Veneva Venelina BUL 1.98 
6   Kuptsova Marina RUS 1.95 
7   Vlaic Blanka CRO 1.95 
8   Acuff Amy USA 1.95 
9   Beitia Ruth ESP 1.90 
10   Babakova Inha UKR 1.90 
10   Mykhalchenko Iryna UKR 1.90 
12   Kaliturina Olga RUS 1.85 





t-and-f: Commentary on Van Damme Meet

2003-09-05 Thread FranciCash
09/05/2003  14:51:33 EST  Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP Photo  
 
Kelli White Makes Winning Return 
By RAF CASERT 
Associated Press Writer 

Kelli White made a winning return to the track Friday, capturing the 100 meters a week 
after she became embroiled in a drug scandal at the World Championships.

The world champion led a 1-2-3 American finish, followed by Chryste Gaines and Tori 
Edwards.

White was slow out of the blocks and despite a slight headwind won in 10.87 seconds, 
just 0.02 seconds off her personal best she set in France last week.

It was my first time on the track for eight days, White said. It was my first 
normal day.

Gaines, who missed out on the 100 at the worlds, ran a personal record of 10.88. 
Edwards, the silver medalist behind White last week, also beat the 11-second mark in 
10.98.

After her 100 victory at the world championships, White tested positive for a 
stimulant. She escaped a suspension that would have kept her from the Athens Olympics, 
but she could still lose her 100 and 200 gold medals.

She skipped the 1,600-meter relay at the championships because of the doping scandal.

It's been tough, she said.

Asafa Powell, who was disqualified at the world championships for a false start, set a 
personal best of 10.02 to upset the favorites in the 100 meters. The Jamaican surged 
ahead in the closing stages, beating U.S. runner Justin Gatlin by 0.07 seconds. 
American Bernard Williams finished third in 10.10. John Capel, the 200 world champion, 
was fourth in 10.13.

In France, Powell was a victim of the new false start rule that immediately 
disqualifies any sprinter following a first false start in the race.

This is kind of revenge for what happened to me, he said. I was very eager to win 
this one.

While Powell accepted the decision, American Jon Drummond threw a tantrum in 
Saint-Denis, holding up the race for half an hour.

Hicham El Guerrouj, dominated the 1,500 as he has all season, never letting France's 
Mehdi Baala threaten him in an identical 1-2 finish as in the worlds.

Despite his complaints about fatigue, the Moroccan still finished in a season's top 
time of 3 minutes, 28.40 seconds, improving on his own mark. Baala set a French record 
of 3:28.98.

In the women's race, Sureyya Ayhan shrugged off the disappointment of a runner-up 
finish at the worlds and won the 1,500 in a world-leading time this year, 3:55.33.

Qatar's Saif Saeed Shaheen set an Asian record in the steeplechase, finishing in 
8:00.07, improving on the mark he set last month by 2.42 seconds. It also was the 
world best time this season, as he held off Paul Kipsiele Koech in the home stretch by 
0.36 seconds.

Shaheen was trying to become the first this season to break the 8-minute mark.

This was the meet to break the (world) record, he said. He was almost five seconds 
slow for that mark. I'm not happy at all.

Kenyan Wilfred Bungei, who missed the worlds because of malaria, improved on the 
season's best time in the 800, finishing in 1:42.52, edging Mbulaeni Mulaudzi of South 
Africa by 0.37 seconds.

In the 400 hurdles, world record holder Yuliya Pechonkina of Russia bounced back from 
her surprising defeat at the world championships last week to win in 53.49 seconds, 
the third-best time of the season. Sandra Glover of the United States was second, 0.38 
seconds behind.

After she pulled out of the world championships because of illness, double Olympic 
champion Derartu Tulu of Ethiopia got some revenge, easily winning the 5,000 ahead of 
Kenya's Isabella Ochichi and prerace favorite Edith Masai.

In the javelin, Tatyana Shikolenko won with a throw of 201 feet, 4 inches, beating 
Steffi Nerius of Germany and Nikolett Szabo of Hungary.
 



t-and-f: NYTimes.com Article: The Decline and Fall of Sports Ratings

2003-09-10 Thread francicash
This article from NYTimes.com 
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Sports are watched differently than they were during the era of the three-network 
universe. The bonds of loyalty to a nationally televised sport can be broken more 
easily because there is so much else to do and perhaps less patience. If Sampras is 
not playing Andre Agassi, viewers may flip to Sex and the City.



[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/ advertisement ---\

Explore more of Starbucks at Starbucks.com.
http://www.starbucks.com/default.asp?ci=1015
\--/

The Decline and Fall of Sports Ratings

September 10, 2003
 By RICHARD SANDOMIR 




 

Down. That is where the ratings of most major sports events
went in the past year. Whether it was the World Series, the
N.B.A. finals, all four Grand Slam golf tournaments or the
recently completed United States Open, network ratings
tumbled. 

The declines, in some cases, were huge and led to record
ratings lows, and they could lead to networks' slowing the
growth in payments for future deals. 

With the National Basketball Association gone from NBC,
ratings for the finals on ABC this year dropped by more
than a third. Shaun Micheel's victory at the P.G.A.
Championship in August sent CBS's rating down 38 percent,
after ratings for Jim Furyk's triumph at the United States
Open fell by almost half on NBC. 

The prime-time United States Open women's tennis final,
created in 2001 as a Venus and Serena Williams perennial,
dropped 52 percent to a 2.5 for CBS last Saturday when one
Belgian, Justine Henin-Hardenne, defeated another, Kim
Clijsters. (Each rating point equals 1.07 million TV
households.) 

It has been a weird year; a confluence of factors put a
larger-than-usual dent in the viewership of major sports.
The war in Iraq drew viewers away in the spring, especially
from the N.C.A.A. men's basketball tournament (the
championship game rating fell 16 percent). Rain shortened
the Daytona 500 and caused days' worth of delays at the
United States Open, which also suffered from Pete Sampras's
retirement and injuries to the Williams sisters. Tiger
Woods was a factor in only one of golf's majors, and the
ratings drop-off ranged from 7 percent (the British Open)
to 44 percent (the United States Open). 

The N.B.A.'s decision to shift the bulk of its games to
cable, on ESPN and TNT, meant lower ratings for ABC, which
did not build the type of audience NBC had because it
carried far fewer games. 

The oases of strength in sports broadcasting continue to be
the National Football League (ABC's Buccaneers-Eagles game
was the highest-rated Monday night game in two years) and
Nascar, which has benefited greatly from moving its main
races from cable to NBC and Fox. When rain curtailed the
Daytona 500 last February, Fox said it was on its way to
posting its highest rating in years. 

Still, the overall direction of sports ratings is clear.
If you look at sports ratings over the past decade,
they've declined in general, said Ken Schanzer, the
president of NBC Sports. The question is whether the
amount of the decline this year is the start of a trend. 

Artie Bulgrin, ESPN's senior vice president for research,
said this year's declines were accelerated by a key segment
of viewers focused on the war in Iraq. 

The audience that paid closest attention to the news,
post-9/11, was males 18 to 34, and they were affected for a
period that forced sports to take a back seat, he said. 

He added: It's misleading to look at ratings for selected
events and conclude that a negative trend is happening.
Sports have never been healthier. 

Still, sports ratings are not immune to the erosion
throughout broadcast television, a trend linked to cable
and satellite TV, the Internet, home video and other
options. 

Ten years ago, the World Series had a 17.3 rating; last
year it fell to 11.9. The N.C.A.A. championship game
produced a 22.2 rating 10 years ago; this year it dipped to
12.6. 

Only eight years ago, the leading prime-time network
program, Seinfeld, averaged a 20.4 rating; this past
season the top show, C.S.I., generated a 16.3 

Ratings are smaller than ever, and the sports world is the
exaggerated tip of it, said Peter Gardiner, chief media
officer of the advertising agency Deutsch Inc. 

Sports are watched differently than they were during the
era of the three-network universe. The bonds of loyalty to
a nationally televised sport can be broken more easily
because there is so much else to do and perhaps less
patience. If Sampras is not playing Andre Agassi, viewers
may flip to Sex and the City. 

There are different ways to view the decline in ratings for
virtually everything but the Super Bowl. Bulgrin said that
from 1996 to 2001, Nielsen Media Research figured that the
average rating for nationally televised sports fell 10
percent, a bigger drop than for any other segment of the TV
audience. On the other hand, for the year ended in 

t-and-f: NYTimes.com Article: Decoding a Steroid: Hunches, Sweat, Vindication

2003-11-02 Thread francicash
This article from NYTimes.com 
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]


/ advertisement ---\

FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION: IN AMERICA - IN THEATRES NOVEMBER 26

Fox Searchlight Pictures proudly presents IN AMERICA
directed by Academy Award(R) Nominee Jim Sheridan (My Left
Foot and In The Name of the Father). IN AMERICA stars Samantha
Morton, Paddy Considine and Djimon Hounsou. For more info:
http://www.foxsearchlight.com/inamerica

\--/

Decoding a Steroid: Hunches, Sweat, Vindication

November 2, 2003
 By JERE LONGMAN and JOE DRAPE 



 

Last June 13, a test tube of clear liquid arrived by
overnight mail at the Olympic drug-testing laboratory at
the University of California, Los Angeles. The liquid
included residue from a syringe that a tipster said
contained an undetectable anabolic steroid. 

In 21 years as director of the laboratory, Dr. Donald H.
Catlin had never encountered a smoking gun like this. He
had believed for several years that some athletes were
cheating with impunity by using designer steroids, and now
he had a chance to prove it. 

Over the next three months, using high-tech screening
devices and low-tech tools like pencil and paper, Dr.
Catlin and a team of eight chemists cracked the chemical
code of the steroid, tetrahydrogestrinone, or THG,
synthesized it and developed a test to catch those who used
it. 

The result has been a billowing scandal. Urine samples from
five track athletes, including Regina Jacobs, the perennial
top American women's miler, and Dwain Chambers, Britain's
top sprinter, who trains in California, have shown THG in
preliminary tests, according to officials familiar with the
results. The athletes did not knowingly take a prohibited
substance, their lawyers have said. 

The federal authorities are investigating a nutritional
supplement company, the Bay Area Laboratory Cooperative, or
Balco, which one anti-doping official called the likely
source of the steroid. Subpoenas to appear before a grand
jury have been issued to baseball stars like Barry Bonds
and Jason Giambi, and reportedly to dozens of other
athletes including various professional football players,
the boxer Shane Mosley and the sprinter Marion Jones. 

A lawyer for one of the athletes said the authorities were
investigating the sale and distribution of THG, along with
possible tax evasion by Balco. Victor Conte, Balco's
president, has denied being the source of the THG. 

Apparently for the first time in a game of pharmacological
cat and mouse that has spanned four decades, an unknown
performance-enhancing drug has been identified, a test for
it has been developed and urine samples have been
re-examined before any athletes who might have used the
drug were aware that the authorities knew the steroid
existed. 

It has left the scientists who detected THG with a
bittersweet sense of enormous accomplishment and dread. 

It's really nice to be able to solve an important, complex
problem, Dr. Catlin, 65, a professor of molecular and
medical pharmacology, said in a telephone interview. 

On the other hand, the existence of the steroid would
undoubtedly not be known if a track coach who has not been
identified had not stepped forward. He gave the syringe to
anti-doping officials in Colorado, who sent it to Dr.
Catlin. 

There must be other undetected steroids out there, Dr.
Catlin believes, made by clandestine labs without regard to
approved safety standards or federal laws. I do shiver a
lot, Dr. Catlin said in contemplating a prospect he calls
horrifying. 

Dr. Caroline Hatton, a chemist at the U.C.L.A. lab, agreed.
It's pretty chilling, she said. It's like our worst
nightmare was just proved. This might just be the tip of
the iceberg. We hope to learn more in a few days, weeks,
months. We're a little afraid of what we don't know and may
never learn. 

A Longstanding Problem 

Dr. Hatton and Dr. Catlin work in a low-slung building
abutting an auto body shop two miles from the main U.C.L.A.
campus. There is no sign on the door to identify it as the
Olympic Analytical Laboratory. If the outside is
nondescript, though, the inside contains one of the world's
foremost laboratories for the research and testing of
performance-enhancing drugs. 

Each year, 25,000 tests are conducted here for clients like
the United States Olympic Committee, the National
Collegiate Athletic Association and the National Football
League. The laboratory opened in 1982 and served as the
official drug-testing center for the 1984 Summer Olympics
in Los Angeles; later it provided screening for the Games
in Atlanta and Salt Lake City. The U.C.L.A. laboratory is
one of 30 worldwide accredited by the International Olympic
Committee, and the only one in the United States. 

Frankly, I didn't know much about the problem when I first
started, Dr. Catlin said. He had grown interested in the
drug issue while helping to treat heroin addicts as a young

t-and-f: NYTimes.com Article: Results of Steroid Testing Spur Baseball to Set Tougher Rules

2003-11-14 Thread francicash
This article from NYTimes.com 
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]


/ advertisement ---\

FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION: IN AMERICA - IN THEATRES NOVEMBER 26

Fox Searchlight Pictures proudly presents IN AMERICA
directed by Academy Award(R) Nominee Jim Sheridan (My Left
Foot and In The Name of the Father). IN AMERICA stars Samantha
Morton, Paddy Considine and Djimon Hounsou. For more info:
http://www.foxsearchlight.com/inamerica

\--/

Results of Steroid Testing Spur Baseball to Set Tougher Rules

November 14, 2003
 By JACK CURRY and JERE LONGMAN 



 

PHOENIX, Nov. 13 - Major League Baseball, which has labored
for several seasons under suspicion that some of its star
players were using steroids, said Thursday that in the
first year of testing for steroids more than 5 percent of
players' tests were positive. As a result, stricter testing
standards will go into effect next year. 

From 5 to 7 percent of the 1,438 random, anonymous tests of
players on major league teams' 40-man rosters this year
were positive, baseball said, triggering testing for the
2004 season that could result in penalties against players.
The players would also be identified publicly. 

Though the number of positive tests ranged from 70 to 100,
it was unclear how many players tested positive. Of the
1,438 tests, 240 were repeat tests, and so some players may
have tested positive twice. 

The steroid issue has intensified for baseball since two
former Most Valuable Players, Ken Caminiti and Jose
Canseco, said in 2002 that they used them and that many
other players did, too. More muscle-bound players and an
explosion in performance by hitters added to the suspicion
that some players might be using performance-enhancing
drugs. 

Baseball's team owners began a push for testing, but the
players' union was reluctant before agreeing to the program
last year, when a new labor contract was signed. 

Hopefully, this will, over time, allow us to completely
eradicate the use of performance enhancement substances in
baseball, Commissioner Bud Selig said in a statement. 

But Dr. Gary I. Wadler, a professor of medicine at New York
University who is an expert on performance-enhancing drugs,
noted that if the 70 to 100 positive tests were grouped
together, they would exceed the number of players on the
40-man roster of any of baseball's 30 teams. This seems to
indicate that steroid use was widespread, he said, calling
into question the legitimacy of baseball players' recent
achievements. 

That's really a very sorry day for baseball, Dr. Wadler
said. 

As part of the labor agreement concluded last year, which
included the ban on steroids, baseball and the players'
union agreed to the anonymous testing for 2003. Because the
positive test results exceeded the 5 percent threshold, the
agreement calls for all players to undergo stricter testing
starting on March 2, 2004. If the number had been less than
5 percent, the same survey testing would have been repeated
next year. 

Until agreeing to testing last year, the players union had
been opposed to it on the grounds that it infringed on
players' privacy rights. 

The new testing plan will be in effect for 2004 and 2005.
Unless the combined positive rate is less than 2.5 percent
in those years, it will also be in place in 2006. 

The announcement comes at a time when two of baseball's
biggest stars, Barry Bonds and Jason Giambi, have been
called to testify before a federal grand jury in California
in the investigation of a company suspected of making
steroids. Bonds and Giambi have said they received only
nutritional supplements from the company. 

Beginning next season, the first time a player tests
positive he will receive treatment and education about the
substance that was abused and be subject to further
testing. A second positive will result in the player's
being identified publicly and include a 15-day suspension
or up to a $10,000 fine. The penalties escalate to a
one-year suspension or up to a $100,000 fine for the fifth
positive test. Suspensions will be without pay. 

If it's something that will ultimately make the problem go
away or speculation of a problem go away, then what's wrong
with that? said Mets pitcher Tom Glavine, the National
Leaguers' representative during the negotiations last year.


Players had no specific knowledge of when they would be
tested, but they knew since the collective bargaining
agreement was reached on Sept. 30, 2002, that tests would
be administered at some point this season. Billy Beane, the
general manager of the Oakland Athletics, said it probably
surprised him that players tested positive despite having
at least four months' advance knowledge that testing was
imminent. 

It's good that there's been some attention to it, he
said. Both sides have agreed there should be attention
paid. This is the result of it. 

The tests were conducted in two phases, with 1,198 

t-and-f: NYTimes.com Article: East German Steroids#146; Toll: #146;They Killed Heidi#146;

2004-01-26 Thread francicash
This article from NYTimes.com 
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]


LONG ARTICLE

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


/ advertisement ---\

THE DREAMERS - IN SELECT CITIES FEBRUARY 6

Set against the turbulent political backdrop of 1968 France
when the voice of youth was reverberating around Europe,
THE DREAMERS is a story of self-discovery as three students
test each other to see just how far they will go. Pure
Bertolucci, proclaims The New Yorker. THE DREAMERS makes
its North American premiere at the 2004 Sundance Film
Festival.

http://www.foxsearchlight.com/thedreamers/index_nyt.html

\--/

East German Steroids#146; Toll: #146;They Killed Heidi#146;

January 26, 2004
 By JERE LONGMAN 



 

MAGDEBURG, Germany, Jan. 20 - Andreas Krieger opened a
shopping bag in his living room and spilled out his past:
track and field uniforms, a scrapbook and athlete
credentials from the former East Germany. 

The photos on the credentials looked familiar, but the face
was fuller and softer, the hair covering the ears and
draping down the neck. This was Heidi Krieger, the 1986
European women's shot-put champion, perhaps the most
extreme example of the effects of an insidious,
state-sponsored system of doping in East Germany. 

The taking of pills and injections of anabolic steroids
created virile features and heightened confusion about an
already uncertain sexual identity, Krieger said,
influencing a decision to have a sex-change operation in
1997 and to become known legally as Andreas. 

They killed Heidi, Krieger said. 

More than 14 years
after the fall of the Berlin Wall, and more than three
years after criminal trials resulted in convictions of East
Germany's top sports official and sports doctor, Krieger
and a number of other athletes are still trying to resolve
legal, medical and psychological issues related to the
secretive doping program that was known by the Orwellian
euphemism of supporting means. Many of the athletes were
minors at the time and say they were given
performance-enhancing drugs without their knowledge. 

Karen König, a retired swimmer, filed a civil lawsuit
against the German Olympic Committee, contending that it
inherited more than $2.5 million in assets from East
Germany upon reunification in 1990 and thus bears
responsibility to assist the former East German athletes. 

She is seeking $12,500 in a test case, and as many as 140
former East German athletes, including Krieger, are
deciding whether to file similar complaints. Last month, a
state court in Frankfurt ruled that König's case could
proceed. Indications are that the case could be settled out
of court, according to German news reports. 

Jens Steinigen, König's lawyer, said in a telephone
interview that he was also exploring the possibility of
suing the pharmaceutical company VEB Jenapharm, formerly
state-run and now a subsidiary of the Schering AG Group.
According to evidence in the criminal trials of the late
1990's, Jenapharm produced the steroid Oral-Turinabol that
was given to East German athletes. 

We won't be able to make these wrongs undone, but the
athletes can still use the money for medicine or therapy,
Steinigen said. 

As Krieger sees it, no amount of money could restore his
health, which he considers harmed by steroid use and
secondary effects. He experiences such intense discomfort
in his hips and thighs, from lifting massive amounts of
weight while on performance-enhancing drugs, that he can no
longer sleep on his side. Only the mildest physical
exertion is tolerable. Long unemployed, he now works two
days a week as a clerk for a real estate agent. 

On Tuesday, the same day that President Bush called for an
end to steroid abuse in American sports in his State of the
Union address, Krieger again told his own story, feeling
compelled to shed more light on one of the darkest chapters
in the history of performance-enhancing drugs. 

As many as 10,000 East German athletes were involved in a
state-sponsored attempt to build a country of 16 million
into a sports power rivaling the United States and the
Soviet Union, recent trials and documents of the East
German secret police have revealed. 

An estimated 500 to 2,000 former East German athletes are
believed to be experiencing significant health problems
associated with steroids, including liver tumors, heart
disease, testicular and breast cancer, gynecological
problems, infertility, depression and eating disorders.
Some female athletes have reported miscarriages and have
had children born with deformities like club feet. 

In 2002, two years after the criminal trials ended, the
German government established a compensation fund of $2.5
million for the doping victims, with a maximum payout of
$12,500. Only 311 athletes, however, made claims - Krieger
among them - by the deadline of March 31, 2003, according
to Birgit Boese, a board member of Doping Victim Aid, an
assistance group. 

Some 

t-and-f: NYTimes.com Article: Sports of The Times: A Last Chance at Winning Olympic Gold Is Being Tarnished by Politics

2004-03-15 Thread francicash
The article below from NYTimes.com 
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]



/- E-mail Sponsored by Fox Searchlight \

THE DREAMERS - IN SELECT CITIES

Set against the turbulent political backdrop of 1968 France
when the voice of youth was reverberating around Europe, THE
DREAMERS is a story of self-discovery as three students test
each other to see just how far they will go. THE DREAMERS
is now playing in select theaters.  
for more info: 
http://www.foxsearchlight.com/thedreamers/index_nyt.html

\--/


Sports of The Times: A Last Chance at Winning Olympic Gold Is Being Tarnished by 
Politics

March 14, 2004
 By HARVEY ARATON 



 

A WEEK after his daughter was born last month, Sammie
Henson took a road trip that mystified friends, frightened
family, made people wonder what in heaven's name an athlete
might risk for the sake of his sport. 

His sister asked his father, How can you let him go?


His father replied, You know Sammie's going to do what he
wants to do. 

Lucky for him his wife, Stephanie, the one left behind with
the three little ones, from newborn to 4, understood best.
She knew he had to go because his competitive blood was
boiling and the Olympics were beckoning and the tournament
was in the very kind of rabid environment that made the
challenge beguiling. 

Sammie Henson got on the plane with the small contingent in
United States colors and returned to a country he had
visited once before and where freestyle wrestling is really
a mania. He went to Iran and he went without fear. 

If you're an athlete who truly loves what you do, you go,
he said. And I've always tried to do what I felt was in my
heart. 

This is not to confuse Iran with postwar Afghanistan, or
Tehran with post-Saddam Baghdad. Nor is it Crawford, Tex.
And it was just two years ago, in the aftermath of 9/11,
that an American freestyle wrestling team was due to depart
for Tehran to compete in the world championships, when a
call was received at the Colorado Springs headquarters of
USA Wrestling, bearing cautionary news. 

It was the State Department, saying that they knew of
threats that had been made against us, said Gary Abbott,
director of special projects for USA Wrestling. Even
though we had a good relationship with the Iranians from
our first postrevolution competition there in 1998, our
board voted not to go. It's the world we live in, and it's
always a question. 

More than ever now as we count down to the Athens Summer
Olympics, with Greece saying it needs NATO's help to secure
the Games, as terrorist bombs tear apart Spanish trains and
heighten fear across Europe. United States athletes, for
their part, are facing their first mass excursion abroad
since 9/11 and the invasion of Iraq, at a time when even in
Mexico American soccer players are subjected to Osama!
chants. 

On the flip side of insanity was Sammie Henson's experience
last month in the quarterfinals of the Tehran tournament
known as the Takhti Cup, where he found himself on the mat
against a Turk and suddenly a crowd of several thousand -
all men - was chanting U.S.A.! U.S.A.! 

Could be there are some old regional resentments that take
precedence over the continuous frost between the United
States and a country President Bush included in his axis
of evil. Henson's take on the outburst of support in the
aforementioned match he lost was something less political. 

I just think the Iranians know and respect good
wrestling, he said. 

It was in Tehran in 1998 that Henson won a world
championship, watched the American flag rise to the roof in
a country that had not been host to American athletes for
two decades. He went on to win a silver medal at the Sydney
Summer Games in 2000 before he started pinning diapers more
than opponents. He became an assistant wrestling coach at
Oklahoma and Penn State and this season at West Point. 

At 33, on the outermost edge of his wrestling prime, Henson
is gunning for a last shot at the gold. Up a class in
weight to 121 pounds, he admits that the favorite to win
the Olympic trials in May is Steven Abas, but he
occasionally answers the telephone these days with the
greeting, Sammie Henson, 2004 Olympic champion. 

He has no doubt where he wants to be come August, and that
is why he kicked his Olympic drive into gear in Iran, where
he could count on the creative tension he relished when he
defeated a Cuban, a reigning world champion, in Havana. 

Henson has wrestled as far away as Siberia and has always
come home feeling warm and fuzzy, as he did last month. How
many Americans, he wondered, get to compete and kibitz with
counterparts from Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran and Iraq in
the same week? How many will tell their children, as Henson
surely will, that they beat an Iranian in Tehran in
February 2004, and received a round of polite applause? 

In Tehran, Amir Bashiri, an Iranian-American who has worked
with the wrestling teams of both countries, 

t-and-f: NYTimes.com Article: Outdoors: Endurance Athletes Are Taking Up Snowshoe Racing to Stay Fit Year-Round

2004-03-15 Thread francicash
The article below from NYTimes.com 
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]


An alternative to the treadmill and more fun

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


/- E-mail Sponsored by Fox Searchlight \

THE DREAMERS - IN SELECT CITIES

Set against the turbulent political backdrop of 1968 France
when the voice of youth was reverberating around Europe, THE
DREAMERS is a story of self-discovery as three students test
each other to see just how far they will go. THE DREAMERS
is now playing in select theaters.  
for more info: 
http://www.foxsearchlight.com/thedreamers/index_nyt.html

\--/


Outdoors: Endurance Athletes Are Taking Up Snowshoe Racing to Stay Fit Year-Round

March 14, 2004
 By Alicia Ault 



 

SQUAW VALLEY, Calif. 

On a cloudless, crisp day in the northern Sierras last
Sunday, 90 snowshoe-clad men and women, and a few
teenagers, bunched together at an icy starting line, raring
to run up the steep slope before them. They had come to
compete in the United States National Snowshoe
Championships. 

With efforts for snowshoe racing's inclusion in the Olympic
program unsuccessful to date, the sport offers only the
thrill of victory, a T-shirt and, occasionally, some money
to those who finish first. 

In fact, there was no prize money at the 10-kilometer
(6.2-mile) nationals, where racers zigzagged up a ski
slope, gaining 800 feet in a mile, crunched through a mile
of powder, skidded down a pitch so severe that some took it
on their backsides, and finished with a long, flat loop
around a meadow. The top racers clocked six- to
seven-minute miles while running at elevation over 6,000
feet and wearing aluminum snowshoes that measured 22 to 25
inches in length. 

.  Nine regional events produced 167 qualifiers for the
nationals in five divisions: competition, open, masters,
juniors and seniors. Only 90 showed up, partly because of
the low stakes and the long travel for some. 

Even so, It's a whole lot more competitive than it was
four years ago, said Nikki Kimball, this year's women's
champion, who finished in 47 minutes 31 seconds. 

Kimball, a 32-year-old physical therapist from Plattsburgh,
N.Y., said trail runners, ultramarathon runners and other
endurance athletes were increasingly taking up snowshoe
racing. 

The men's champion, Greg Krause, a 26-year-old triathlete
from Denver, finished in 40:07. Bernie Boettcher, a
41-year-old from Silt, Colo., who finished third here, said
he started racing to train for mountain running and kept at
it when he realized it let him train year-round. 

Peter Fain, a 31-year-old trail runner from Truckee,
Calif., brought the snowshoe championships to Squaw Valley
this year. He said one reason he started snowshoeing was,
Here you can't run in the winter unless you want to run on
the side of the road, which is foolish. 

Snowshoe racing has been around for 150 years but has
evolved into a competitive sport in the last decade. Mark
Elmore, sports director of the United States Snowshoe
Association, attributes this growth to the advent of
lightweight aluminum frames, urethane decking and
spring-loaded bindings that let racers pop off the snow
with less effort. 

The one-pound shoes often have a slight asymmetrical shape
to enhance the running stride, and have sharp cleats for
traction. Many racers rivet running shoes into the frame. 

The learning curve is minimal - if you can run, you can
race on snowshoes - and costs are reasonable. Snowshoes run
$200 to $300, and race entry fees are $5 to $35. Entry to
the nationals cost $10. 

The Outdoor Industry Association estimates that of six
million snowshoers, about one million are hardcore
participants, lured by the woods in the winter and the
potential to burn 500 to 1,000 calories an hour. 

.  From 5,000 to 10,000 people participate in the 100 or so
races held each year from December to March in
Massachusetts, Vermont, Maine, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,
Michigan, Wisconsin, Oregon, Washington, Alaska and
California. There are also international races in Canada,
Finland, Japan, Italy and France. Colorado and New York
have the most races. 

The snowshoe association was established in 1977 mostly to
regulate qualifying events for the Empire State Games.
Based in Corinth, N.Y., the nonprofit association has
worked since 2000 to organize regional qualifiers, and the
first national championships were held in 2001 in
Plattsburgh. The top five finishers at the nationals win
slots on the United States team, which would compete
internationally if finances matched ambitions. 

But for most competitors at the nationals, snowshoe racing
is more about fitness than reward. The endurance athletes
among them say trudging through snow offers a superior
aerobic workout. 

It's the best training I do all year, said Mark Macy, a
50-year-old trial lawyer from Evergreen, Colo., who won the
men's masters division in 51:15. When not arguing cases,
Macy runs ultramarathons and competes in 

t-and-f: NYTimes.com Article: Balco Twist Puts U.S. Track on Defensive

2004-04-21 Thread francicash
The article below from NYTimes.com 
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]



/- E-mail Sponsored by Fox Searchlight \

THE CLEARING - IN THEATERS JULY 2 - WATCH THE TRAILER NOW

An official selection of the 2004 Sundance Film Festival, THE CLEARING
stars ROBERT REDFORD and HELEN MIRREN as Wayne and Eileen Hayes - a
husband and wife living the American Dream. Together they've raised two
children and struggled to build a successful business from the ground
up. But there have been sacrifices along the way. When Wayne is
kidnapped by an ordinary man, Arnold Mack (WILLEM DAFOE), and held for
ransom in a remote forest, the couple's world is turned inside out.
Watch the trailer at: http://www.foxsearchlight.com/theclearing/index_nyt.html

\--/


Balco Twist Puts U.S. Track on Defensive

April 21, 2004
 By JERE LONGMAN 



 

In three months, Olympic trials will determine the United
States' track and field team for the Summer Games in
Athens. In four months, the Games will begin. No team is
historically more powerful than the Americans in track and
field, the Summer Olympics' most important sport. But no
team is more unsettled at the moment, given the possibility
of continuing fallout from the Balco steroids scandal. 

Already, four American track and field stars face
suspensions after testing positive for the designer steroid
THG, or tetrahydrogestrinone. National and international
Olympic and track officials are tensely waiting to find out
whether other athletes will be prohibited from competing in
Athens because they used illicit performance-enhancing
drugs. 

A potential twist in the case is this: Athletes do not have
to test positive to be considered doping cheaters. The
United States Anti-Doping Agency, which oversees drug
screening in Olympic sports, can sanction athletes if they
admit to having used banned substances or if other
evidence, including documents, statements and witnesses,
can prove drug use beyond a reasonable doubt. 

As Olympic and track officials await a resolution of the
Balco case, which may not go to trial until the fall, they
face the potential embarrassment of sending cheaters to
Athens and then having to force athletes to return tainted
medals after the Games end. Sports officials would like the
Balco issue settled quickly, but they are powerless to
resolve matters themselves. 

We have to wait; there's nothing we can do, really, said
Nick Davies, a spokesman for track and field's world
governing body, known as the I.A.A.F. It's something we
have to live with. 

Terry Madden, chief executive of the American anti-doping
agency, said in February that he expected investigations by
the federal government and the anti-doping agency will
lead to the initiation of more doping cases against
athletes and others. 

How does the anti-doping agency build its case against
athletes who may be implicated in the Balco case but who
have not tested positive in drug screenings? One clue is a
meeting tentatively scheduled for today between officials
of the anti-doping agency and Victor Conte Jr., founder of
Balco, the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative. He is one of
four men in the case charged with distributing steroids and
laundering money. It is not certain whether the meeting
will occur, Robert Holley, who is Conte's lawyer, said
yesterday. 

Presumably, the anti-doping agency would seek firsthand
knowledge about doping and corroborating documents from
Conte. But it is not clear that such a meeting would be
beneficial to either side. It remains uncertain what Conte
would offer to the anti-doping agency, or what the
anti-doping agency could offer him. 

Conte would be unlikely to admit anything to the United
States Anti-Doping Agency without first securing a deal
from federal prosecutors, lawyers familiar with the case
said. 

Any plea negotiation or any negotiations of any kind of
disposition short of trial would have to go directly
through the U.S. Attorney's office and the Justice
Department, period, Holley said. And U.S.A.D.A. isn't
part of that. 

It is possible, officials involved in the investigation
said, that Conte's cooperation with the anti-doping agency
might be viewed favorably in a plea negotiation with the
United States attorney's office in San Francisco, which is
prosecuting the case. Conte is also scheduled to meet today
with prosecutors to examine evidence, Holley said. 

Victor Conte has information that he would love to be of
service to the Olympic Committee, if that were something
that were a viable option, given the charges pending
against him, Holley said. But, he added, We cannot do
anything to hurt his position. 

The anti-doping agency has worked with federal
investigators on the Balco case, but it is not known how
much evidence the Justice Department would share as it
builds its own criminal case. Matthew J. Jacobs, an
assistant United States attorney in San Francisco, declined
to comment on the