I'm glad to be able to post Mr Norton's email as he
suggests.
P N H
==
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:26:50 -0500
From: Giles Norton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76
1. This is a commercial advertisement and as such is
expessely forbidden by this list charter. Mr Entine has
sailed near the wind and been roundly condemned by
many on this list (while Mr Scott Davis has clearly
infringed and continues to get away with it.) But this is
blatant touting for
The IAAF handbook for 1965-66 said (at rule 148.4.d):
Records in field events must be measured by three field
judges with a certified steel tape graduated in centimetres,
or by a scientific apparatus . . . . Measurements for world
records for field events must be MADE [my emphasis]
and submitted
Some more, for those interested in a little US/NZ history.
When John Delamere jumped 25' 63/4 at the 1974 Pacific
Conference meet he tied with Randy Williams, the reigning
Olympic champ. He did not just wow the crowd; the officials
at the pit suddenly became speechless. John's best legal
jump
Scott Davis calls into question the honesty of my advertisement
for a certain copy of Archie's Little Black Book 1959. That
must be answered.
Mr Richardson wrote a personal message in some copies
acknowledging the addressee's part in a committee that
conducted an international
FOR SALE
Archie's Little Black Book, 1953 Edition - S, XF, 100 pgs.,
RARE (signed by Archie - which he did for every copy sold).
New price $1.00
AND
Archie's Little Black Book, 1959 Edition - S, XF. 90 pgs.THIS
COPY IS NOT MERELY RARE, BUT UNIQUE AND
The event is now recognised as official by the IAAF,
Roger. Apparently the first world records will be
ratified after 2003 December 31 when the event has
settled down.
If you intend holding a competition, it is worth
mentioning that the new table for the 100m (women)
has become garbled.
important to keep the historical record straight, and I hope
this will help to do so.
P N Heidenstrom
On Sun, 26 May 2002 17:57:23 -0500
Wayne T. Armbrust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P N Heidenstrom wrote:
The work of Nick Linthorne has been extended by
that of Tony Ward-Smith in Britain. Neither included
combined wind+altitude conversions in his published
papers. The only researcher who did
The work of Nick Linthorne has been extended by
that of Tony Ward-Smith in Britain. Neither included
combined wind+altitude conversions in his published
papers. The only researcher who did is Jesus Dapena
(Indiana U.) Tables based on his research appeared
in TFN's LITTLE Green Book.
Anyone who is so uncertain of his opinions (or himself)
that he must hide behind an alias is not worth listening
to at any time.
When he is a sniper as well, it is a blot on this list and
those who allow it.
P N Heidenstrom
=
previously on t-and-f :-
Date: Mon
them work out their own bulges in fear and trembling.
If there are any replies, a summary of them will be posted
later, or individual summaries will be sent to respondents.
Please reply direct to me, not to the list.
P N Heidenstrom
Agence France-Presse
LIEVEN, France (February 21, 2002 02:12 PM EST) - The controversial
Russian distance runner Olga Yegorova has not been invited to run in
Sunday's indoor athletics meeting because she failed to meet the
organizers' family-friendly criteria.
A French promoter has also hit on
Ah, but who was the first Afro-American to run
the mile in a world record time?
Why we don't got no winner? Maybe no-one don't
know. Maybe no-one don't care. Maybe there ain't
never been one, and John Entine's theory is right.
Play it again, John.
is just as much a thief as one who steals money or
goods. Moreover, if authors spend time, skill, or
money to inform or entertain us only to see their
work pirated by freeloaders, they will be less
ready to share it with us in the future, or even
to produce it at all. Then we all lose.
P N
Ah, but who was the first Afro-American to run
the mile in a world record time?
FLO-JO AND THE LEGEND OF THE 10.49
The story so far:
At the US final Olympic tryouts at Indianapolis in 1988
Florence Griffith Joiner lowered the world record for 100m
from 10.76 to 10.49. Others in that and the next
quarterfinal also turned in superfast times. The wind
reading in both
Somebody wrote: Okay, so there weren't any
world records at the Chinese National Games.
Not even in the heats?
Why not?
- that horse's ass, P.N. from New Zealand - M M Rohl
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 11:33:31 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (in part):
page 59: IAAF is reducing the discus and hammer sectors from
a 40 degree arc to 34.92 degrees.
Un-huh.
Okay, what wise-ass TFN clerk slipped that one in?
An arc measured in a HUNDREDTH OF A DEGREE??? Hah!
You're six months
On Sun, 12 Aug 2001 09:13:57 -0400
malmo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But to the point:
1) There is no steps rule.
2) Where there is a material advantage gained (stepping inside on the
turn) there will be a DQ
3) Where there is no material advantage gained (stepping inside/outside
on the
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001 06:43:28 -0400
John Dye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: RE: t-and-f: Access
And how is your Model T Ford holding up these days?
Comment:
---
It may look like a Model T but it's really a NZ design
with few moving parts, does a thousand km to the
litre, has never needed
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 18:59:31 -0400
John Dye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: RE: t-and-f: Access
Break the minutes and seconds into different fields.
Convert everything to seconds for ranking purposes and then put it back in
minutes and seconds format for display and reporting purposes.
After Sebrle set his world decathlon record
last month his marks were converted in terms
of some of the earlier scoring tables, but (if
memory serves) not for all of them. For the sake
of the record (alias the department of useless
information) here is the full set. The year is the
one when the
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
quoting Charlie Francis' book, Speed Trap,
. . . But in 1968, when the IAAF
began to make the transition from hand to electronic timing, it bungled
the job. As an electronic clock would start the instant the gun was
On Sun, 03 Jun 2001 16:28:12 +0300 (IDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Automatic timing in 1 9 5 2
Not in 1952! The hand timing in 1952 was horrible! Look up Bob Sparks'
deciphering of ET . the quartet of runners given 10.4 and the two (Sukhraev,
treloar) given 10.5 in the
for those
who care about the survival of this list.
Yes. Quoting from a book IS trying to sell it, if the
book is your own and you are urging people to get it.
Mr Smith has never done that, nor has anyone else -
except Mr Entine - in the seven years I have been a
subscriber.
P N Heidenstrom
At 21:03 01.05.06, Michael Rohl wrote:
Mr Heidenstrom, you are wrong(again.) Mr.Entine
long ago stopped trying to
sell his book on his list.
(snip)
You contributed nothing of substance too the
conversation and managed to insult Mr. Entine.
Comment:
The last two digests I have received
Sorry, but this discussion is getting off the
"rails".
Cones are NOT legal, except to replace part of
a kerb which has been temporarily removed for a
field event (such as a javelin runway), or where
there is a diversion for the steeplechase.
Tracks without kerbs are ILLEGAL unless they are
The race was in 1965, and Lindgren's time (for three
miles) was 13:04.02. When converted to 5000m using
the Portuguese Tables (arguably the world's best
at that stage) the time became 13:33.6.
But ten months later he ran 12:53.0 at Seattle,
equivalent to 13:22.2.
Pretty good even today, they
Right! And I've never felt comfortable with the rumour
that reaction is always equal and opposite to action -
because the next action to come around the bend may
contradict Newton's notion.
Scientists can never "prove" anything because ultimately
all science (meaning knowledge) depends on
This seems to me to be one of the most basic principles
of justice - it just can't be right to punish accidental
and deliberate drug taking exactly the same way. Surely.
Can it?
There's a third way of committing an offence - negligence.
It can be punished in law just as severely as the
In a message dated Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:14:54 EST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
an attempt to regain its position as one of the world's leading producers
of distance talent, New Zealand has adopted the Kenyan model, starting with
the procedures used to issue birth certificates and passports.
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000 00:54:21 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Netters
"What can I say?
"The British publication Athletics Weekly has named Robert Korzeniowski and
"Marion Jones as Athletes of the Year."
Someone could say that it was a split decision on
Korzeniowski. Four of the
Wasn't it a BBC announcer who commented at the
presentation of trophies after an Oxford-Cambridge
boat race,
"Now isn't that sweet. The wife of the Cambridge
captain is kissing the cox of the Oxford crew."
previously on this show:
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:40:41
Garry Hill wrote:
Isn't that [marooning all the crims on a desert island
and letting them slug it out . . .] how we got Australia?
I thought you as a Kiwi would realize that!
gh
--
Yeah, we used to point that out.
But not now that all the Ocker icons are really
ng
members of this forum. Assuredly lots of us would like
to have a say. If the idea worked, it could then be
extended to the athletes who take performance-enhancing
drugs. They could be made to cheat each other instead of
cheating those who don't bend the rules.
P N Heidenstrom
At 07:02 00.12.18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(1) This is not true. [i.e. that the first 18 finishers in
the Sydney 50k were breaking contact at every stride coming
into the stadium.]
It is futile to bleat "not true". It is on tape. Go and look at
it.
(2) Again you are wrong. The "cause" of
hibitively expensive,
or legally proscribed. It may not even be a solution at all.
But would it not be a good idea to suspend your judgement until
I tell you what it is?
P N Heidenstrom
s loquacious of them), before further exploring what
changes could be made, and how they might solve the
present problems. Replies to the list, please.
P N Heidenstrom
As a non-American, may I to some extent defend the
"antics" of the US sprint relay team at Sydney,
and ask the critics to take them a bit easier -
especially in light of the following post:
Some years ago I gave up watching what Americans
call "Football" and Basketball in disgust at the
y had a very limited understanding of
international rules.
P N Heidenstrom
About Capel's start in the 200 final, Michael
Casey wrote:
All true,
BUT
HOW can Capel or the US complain as it was HIS transgression which was
alowwed pass???
HIS fault alone
MIke
COMMENT:
Rule 146 does not bar appeals from athletes who
transgress. But did he transgress? The
technique is almost certainly wrong!
For anyone who finds these results hard to believe,
full details are available. The tests were done
with a satellite-controlled clock having an r.m.s.
accuracy of 1/10,000,000 second.
P N Heidenstrom
--
Jonas Mureika wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, P. N. Heidenstrom wrote:
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000 Jonas Mureika wrote (inter alia):
Careful: you can't apply the calculation to the 200m. It
only
applies to straight races: 50m, 60m, 100m.
--
44 matches
Mail list logo