Re: t-and-f: Jabbour is the future: was Letter...NYC mara...coverage

2002-11-04 Thread ghill
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 19:53:09 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: t-and-f: Jabbour is the future: was Letter...NYC mara... coverage The answer is BOTH- put it on the net. And allow any station who wants to provide over-the-air

Re: t-and-f: Jabbour is the future: was Letter...NYC mara... coverage

2002-11-04 Thread Kamal T. Jabbour
Let me first thank Tom for his vote of confidence, and clarify some facts: 1- The Internet has the ability to carry TV-quality video. Last weekend we webcast high-school soccer in TV-quality (1.5Mbps) in addition to DSL-speed (384Kbps). Fully one fifth of our viewers enjoyed the TV-quality

Re: t-and-f: Jabbour is the future: was Letter...NYC mara...coverage

2002-11-04 Thread Lee Nichols
I'd much rather webcast track meets than field hockey and volleyball... It's really a shame to be running down other low-profile sports; you know, there are most certainly plenty of people who feel the same way about tf. Speaking as a big volleyball fan, I'd love to see more volleyball

Re: t-and-f: Jabbour is the future: was Letter...NYC mara...coverage

2002-11-04 Thread Lee Nichols
My apologies if I misinterpreted what someone posted. Lee Lee, You misunderstood. Kamal only said what he, personally, would rather webcast. Kamal is a track guy so interested in his favorite sport not so much the others. He wouldn't mind if other people webcast their own favorite sports. So

Re: t-and-f: Jabbour is the future: was Letter...NYC mara... coverage

2002-11-04 Thread Randy Treadway
GM cares about a few thousand hard core fans? I doubt it. IF they did, they'd already fund nationwide coverage. Ultimately (75 years from now? 100?) all television will be delivered via broadband, but at a heck of a lot higher bandwidth than today, given the needs of HDTV. Companies like

Re: t-and-f: Jabbour is the future: was Letter...NYC mara... coverage

2002-11-03 Thread Bob Duncan
Tom Derderian wrote: TV is dead. Webcast is the future. Most webcasts have mediocre picture quality although I have seen a few with pretty good pictures, assuming that you have a high speed connection. The poor quality ones are a chore to watch and the low quality really shows through when the

Re: t-and-f: Jabbour is the future: was Letter...NYC mara... coverage

2002-11-03 Thread Dan Kaplan
No offense to Mr. Jabbour, but I'm amazed anyone thinks the time is remotely near for webcasts to take the place of televised events. The present technology is borderline bearable, and that's with a [presumably] relatively miniscule number of people trying to watch. Who really believes servers

Re: t-and-f: Jabbour is the future: was Letter...NYC mara...coverage

2002-11-03 Thread ghill
From: Tom Derderian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tom Derderian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 19:39:05 - To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: t-and-f: Jabbour is the future: was Letter...NYC mara... coverage The internet is the only hope for our sport. Jabbour is the future. There is

Re: t-and-f: Jabbour is the future: was Letter...NYC mara... coverage

2002-11-03 Thread koala
The answer is BOTH- put it on the net. And allow any station who wants to provide over-the-air coverage to do so as well. Relegate the exclusive contracts to the dustbin of history. RT On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 19:05:34 -0800, you wrote: From: Tom Derderian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tom