This is a first.
Congrats to Nad, or whoever you are. Let's out the stripper. Second, you
are the first sub four minute miler to post nudity to this boring ass list.
Go NAD.
Screw this list.
Schiefer
I would have to agree, a bold move for one of the list's faster members.
Jezz' almost hark's back to the glory days wehn the list was dominated by
college kids who can really talk smack, not just bitch about advertising/
religious sayings and the like.
As for the "stripper", guess she got a
I'd love to see a variation on golf's U.S. open scenario, where 25% of the USATF nationals participants come via local and regional qualifiers. It would create more local publicity for the national meet without affecting the top places very much. More importantly, it would create a logical and
Excuse me, but what percentage of the time when a gun is fired at Penn is
there
even the theoretical possibility of an NCAA qualifying mark being recorded?
While I cannot answer to Division I (and I know that a lot of the list members
believe that DI is the only real track and field division
Danny McCray raised an interesting point in an off-list post, and that's that the "WR"
that Marion Jones is going for at Mt. SAC, 34.1, was run around two turns (because
it's the 300 split in Marita Koch's 47.60 WR in the 400).
Marion will have the advantage of only having to run a single
In a message dated Fri, 13 Apr 2001 9:06:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "nad wilson"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alright, I don't want to be the guy known as the porn peddler but.
all i can say is, "go-nad!"
Dan wrote:
The problem with that being the head to head competition in track and
field as opposed to golf. If you let local runners into a meet who
wouldn't normally be there, they are most likely going to get beaten
handily. In golf it isn't as easy to see because Johnny Local and
Tiger
In a message dated Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:26:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "denise
lockett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just don't understand all the whining about a change that seems so clearly
positive from the point of view of encouraging competition.
Because you've uncovered one of the
In a message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 1:47:11 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, the USC-UCLA meet has traditionally been the first Saturday in May, and the
weather has generally been pretty good for it. Moving it a week earlier would
probably invite poorer weather.
Have to agree. Certainly thre will be some wrinkles and bugs to work out as
folks absorb the change. Big thing is it may help pump a bit of life into
college track which has been moving toward terminal for a long time. We
can't achieve March Madness but at least this may help get more notice
I just don't understand all the whining about a change that seems so
clearly positive from the point of view of encouraging competition.
Because you've uncovered one of the sport's dirty little secrets: everybody is
more interested in protecting their own teeny little bit of turf than
Coach Nick makes some good points. One more I'd like to make is that even
the big track powers who send legions to nationals, win titles, produce
world class athletes and so on...THEY DON'T MAKE ANY MONEY FOR THEIR SCHOOLS
OR THE NCAA! Its a blackhole financially. College track,
Hmmm...
Some whine and cry about a poster using a Bible verse in his auto signature
while others encourage the use of porn on this list.
Who is the list manager, and why hasn't he/she taken appropriate action?
I wonder if the U of Oregon would be interested in knowing that its servers
are
In a message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2001 1:13:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Jack Moran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If "fostering the sport as a whole" means enhancing the NCAA Championships,
I would have to agree. But, pardon my provincialism if I find conference
championships -- with their true
OK, so i need to read farther in the IAAF Rules. No wonder lanes 5 and 6 had such an
advantage at the World Indoor. Rule 214.10 (i guess i stopped memorizing at about
213.8) says that the 200 is seeded from the beginning, with 5 and 6 getting
preference. Hence the almost impoossible nature of
In a message dated 4/14/01 10:55:35 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder if the readers of TF News would be interested in knowing that its
editor endorses porn and its unsolicited distribution.
I wonder if Mr. Hill's wife and family would be interested in knowing of
Oh god, let's not drag this out into a 100 post discussion about the moral
values of America...because there are none. If a kid wanted to look at porn
all he has to do is wait till mommy and daddy are gone or in bed and get on
the internet...it's not difficult. Now, if the list moderator acted
well, this is a tf listlast year when i suggested to someone that they
read my book (american women's track and field:a history 1895-1980), before
posting women's history comments, the list supervisor suggested that i not
advertise (of course, this has been done since)...but where is he/she
I apologize in advance for responding to such an obvious troll, but ...
SD Cap'n wrote:
I wonder if the U of Oregon would be interested in knowing that its servers
are being used to distribute porn.
First, the message in question did NOT distribute anything except a sequence of
letters
on 14/4/01 9:01 PM, alan tobin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh god, let's not drag this out into a 100 post discussion about the moral
values of America...
I'm assuming that Eamon Condon was being ironic...
My problem with the photographs was that I couldn't believe she was a cross
country
I agree. She's way too attractive to be a cross country runner.
s.devereaux
Randall Northam wrote:
on 14/4/01 9:01 PM, alan tobin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh god, let's not drag this out into a 100 post discussion about the moral
values of America...
I'm assuming that Eamon Condon
The Electronic Telegraph
Sunday 15 April 2001
Matthew Hannah
PAULA RADCLIFFE would have loved to have ended her winter season with
victory in yesterday's five-mile road race at Balmoral Castle - but her arch
rival, Gete Wami, crossed the line first to spoil her last race.
Radcliffe, who has
The two points are related. Track Field doesn't get scholarships because it isn't a
money sport. And it isn't a money sport because it doesn't generally draw spectators
because, for example, last chance qualifer meets are a joke that nobody comes to see.
Casual spectators want to see races not
Hi. Fred Finke here.
I am the current moderator until April 17th. I have been trying to put out
this little "stripper thread" fire offline. However, It is time to make a
general statement. Regardless of my personal beliefs, this thread is
proving to be offensive to SEVERAL people on
My understanding is that the NCAA meet will be a week later with the Regionals two
weekends before. Thus the conference meets would only have to be a week ealier to be
two weekends before Regionals. If the rest of the west coast schedule also goes a week
earlier (including Mt.SAC) there would
It is Saturday night. A year or two ago, this list would be full of
noteworthy marks by high schoolers, collegians, national elites, and
international elites (although it is probably too early for the top guns to
start running exceptional times). There would also be thoughtful commentary
on those
Becky Holliday, Clackamas Community COllege, jumped 13'7" 4.14 today to raise
here national record. She had the bar then raised to 4.30. She switched to a
13'6 145 MsStik Carbon. Raised her grip to 12'8" and had on VERY close
attempt. It shall be next weekend when she is over the flu and full
Get a life and use the delete button if you don't like it.
Ed
Becky Holliday, Clackamas Community COllege, jumped 13'7" 4.14 today to
raise
here national record. She had the bar then raised to 4.30. She switched to
a
13'6 145 MsStik Carbon. Raised her grip to 12'8" and had on VERY close
attempt. It shall be next weekend when she is over the flu and full
29 matches
Mail list logo