There will no doubt be the usual inquest undertaken by the Kenyan officials after
Edmonton into why the team performed (in their view) badly.
Then, rather than look at themselves to discover the real reason, they'll conclude
their restrictions weren't harsh enough and tighten them further next
I understand his coach(es) stopped him competing in the last World
championships, though he was hardly missed then.
Vyacheslav Evstratov seems to be the coach that is behind his decision to
withdraw. Borzakovskiy was quoted a few weeks ago denying rumours he would
miss Edmonton.
- Original
What test does it say was used? The combination of tests used in Sydney?
I'm assuming the tests were carried out only on athletes that had agreed
beforehand. I doubt very much whether the IAAF would have allowed compulsory
EPO testing in one of its Golden League meetings at this early stage.
Interesting quote from Borzakovskiy provided by the organisers of today's
meeting in Glasgow:
There is still two months to go before the World championships and, as long
as I am fit, I should be there for a medal. There was a slight scare about
burning myself out but, with only running a few
And it was fast enough to beat a quality field that included Darren
Campbell
of Great Britain and Francis Obikwelu of Nigeria.
I haven't seen the results but I'm pretty sure Campbell wasn't in the race.
I thought he withdrew injured a couple of days ago.
- Original Message -
From:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Allen Iverson- 400 meter runner?
Uh, maybe I'm wrong butcan't most WC guys who run 3:53 and better run
at
least 47-48?
Sorry, I was thinking JT was referring to 3:53 as 1500 metre time! The mile
isn't as prominent in these parts.
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Eldredge-Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: phalford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: t
By my reckoning, after 7 events, he would have needed to equal his best in
the last 3 events - granted, a tall order - to break the WR.
He fell short by 20cm in the PV but he could be on for the 2nd AT score.
- Original Message -
From: Hans-Erik Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: t and f
The Gateshead meeting is actually after Edmonton - something I had
overlooked when I mentioned it to you the other day. That puts it outside
the initial trial period.
Georgio Reineri - the IAAF's spokesman - did seem to believe, though, that
it was up to each event whether or not it
As I said, Britain has only one GP II meeting and that is after the Council
meeting in Edmonton. True, they were strong words from Alan Pascoe but, as
far as I can see, the IAAF weren't asking them to try the rule changes
anyway.
Fast Track, the organisers of Britain's major meetings,
The whole imperial vs metric issue is a complex one that has caused much
discussion here before. There may be respective merits or drawbacks for
using each of the systems in various circumstances.
It depends whether you're talking about results sheets from news outlets or
from the organisers
Great publicity job they've done - not! Their website does give him a
passing mention, but doesn't make clear he's competing or indeed that it is
the world record holder Mike Powell.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:46
From http://www.athletics-online.co.uk/110509pettigrew.htm:
Antonio Pettigrew believes Michael Johnson should have received a guaranteed
place on the world championship 4x400m relay squad without having to run at
the trials.
Johnson, who has won the last four individual world 400m titles,
- Original Message -
From: Kebba Tolbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: t-and-f: The things we miss.
the USATF never said he couldn't run in Edmonton. They said that if he
wants
to run he has to compete in Eugene just like
I agree. One thing that annoys me is scanning through a results sheet and
seeing the same event being staged umpteen different times only with
different titles that make it difficult to establish which is the main one.
Calling them 'A' and 'B' makes it obvious which is the more important.
Which 4.70m, despite what BBC Online and others have reported.
From
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport/hi/english/athletics/newsid_1301000/1301573.stm
Olympic champion Stacy Dragila has broken her own world outdoor pole vault
record by clearing 4.63m (15ft 5in).
Dragila broke the mark of 4.56m (15ft
The delay has to do with one volunteer having to do what normally takes two,
so I've been told. Yesterday's results were apparently available at 11am
today.
And I thought Mt SAC was a big meet.
- Original Message -
From: "Wilmar Kortleever" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Marathon battle in store for blood test campaigners
From http://www.athletics-online.co.uk/110412epo.htm
12th April, 2001
The campaign of many of the world's leading marathon organisers to persuade
the authorities to implement widespread and standardised blood-testing is
yet to yield positive
I agree with most of what Bob says. It would take an investor who can see
the niche is there - as has already happened in other sports of similar
popularity.
It's unfortunate that there are dozens of people around the world all
working hard on web sites that are destined to probably never to
It shows me how undercovered tf must be the U.S. when I go to multi-sport
web sites and have to make about four clicks before I find track and field -
that's if I guess the right route to get there. Rather than putting it
under "Other sports", they sometimes have categories like "Olympic sports"
With the talk of how volunteer sites almost always end up, it's ironic that
one of the few athletics sites with any sort of commercial backing,
Trackwire, has suffered because Rivals Network has reportedly shut down (see
www.trackwire.com).
Rivals.net was a great idea but my impression, from the
More on Kristiansen - from
http://www.athletics-online.co.uk/110408kristiansen.htm.
Ingrid Kristiansen, arguably the greatest women's distance runner in
history, is hoping the recipe for her success will help others.
Ingrid Kristiansen had always been the number two. She was to her compatriot
OK. My apologies.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Michael Blank" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Fw: direction of running
Phalford wrote:
PS - If you post using Netscape, please take a moment to foll
I received this message today. I vaguely
remember hearing an answer to this once but can't recall what it was.
Anyone know?
- Original Message -
From: John
Williams
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 6:13 PM
Subject: direction of running
My friends and I have
Is Steve Bell (ex-webmaster of trackandfield.com)
on this list, or does anyone know how to contact him?
I notice ESPN are showing the Princeton Invitational three weeks after it
happens. I've noticed this sort of thing happens quite often in the U.S.
I can understand stations may not have an immediate gap in the schedule but
three weeks! Is ESPN a history channel or something?
- Original
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: t-and-f: British sprinter given two year ban
The UK caves into the IAAF strong arm tactics.
That's true.
How do you declare a man innocent of wrong doing and suspend
Richardson didn't compete while under ban but had been cleared by UK
Athletics just before the trials. His case was referred to arbitration in
August but, even then, he was allowed to compete in the meantime, whereas
others had been suspended in such a situation.
- Original Message -
The official word is that IAAF made an agreement with TAC before the Trials
allowing him to compete, whereas this did not happen in the German champs.
It still appears inconsistent, though.
Mind you, it was nearly nine years ago and a lot has changed in the sport in
that time. Obviously the
El G withdrew ill (bronchitis?) a few days ago. Results below.
Men
60m SF 1: 1. D Aliu (NGR) 6.61, 2. C Malcolm (GBR) 6.65, 3. L Myles-Mills
(GHA) 6.70, 4. D Money (GBR) 6.73, 5. B Lewis (USA) 6.74, 6. A Condon (GBR)
6.74, 7. F Mayola (CUB) 6.86, 8. I Garcia (CUB) 6.95
60m SF 2: 1. C Miller
I'm not sure whether it's been mentioned with regard to this, but there was
a teleconference in connection with the award, for which both Taylor and
Dragila were available.
So presence at the banquet - and not forgetting athletic performance - may
not be the only factors.
- Original Message
31 matches
Mail list logo