Again, WHY THIS OBSESSION WITH nationality. It's absurd, especially in the
light of the silly barbs thrown my way.
But as for your latest barb, you are flat out wrong
I did discuss this numerous times, and most recently in my post a while back
about why Brits will are doing so lousy. The
Is it really necessary to quote the original message
in full length to every follow-up only to add an
one-liner?
I am receiving the t-and-f digest and it is irritating
to wade through the same hundreds of lines over and over
to spot the reply.
Ralf Linnemann
I'm wondering if the British genes are just not as good currently as they were in the
Coe/Ovett era. Let's face it - if the British had produced another generation of Coe's
and Ovett's including a natural progression of improvement they would be running right
with the best the world has to
My previous remarks stands and is correct. Same routine...Entine posts
dribble, we respond, we respond some more, we get interested, we buy
Entine's book, Entine's pockets get fatter. As Malmo said, same ol shite.
Alan
http://www.geocities.com/runningart2004
From: malmo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Book sales down again Jon?
Alan
From: Jon Entine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jon Entine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Track and Field List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: t-and-f: The End of the British Rule in Running
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 11:45:55 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [128.223.142.13]
I guessed that because the sprints aren't complying with Entine's
bigoted views he'd focus on the 1500.
Nothing new, the same tired, old sh!t.
malmo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Entine
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 2:46
Jon Entine wrote:
Thought this would provoke the usual outrage. If anyone wants to print this
unpublished article, or reproduce it on a website, please send me a note. I
will be most obliging.
Jon, how did West African genes get to the Ukraine and East African genes get
to Switzerland?
--
Malmo:
You are an angry person...
Except the sprint results certainly do reflect, without question, the
underlying bio-genetic reality. Absolutely and unequivocally.
How you can turn science into bigotry is an issue you'll have to deal with
in the confessional both.
On 8/9/01 12:43 PM, malmo
GRRR!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jon Entine
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 4:06 PM
To: malmo; Track and Field List
Subject: Re: t-and-f: The End of the British Rule in Running
Malmo:
You are an angry
Ed,
I think the meaningful part applies to the notion that British athletes
should train harder as Coe suggests in order to beat the Africans. If the
reason for training harder is solely to beat the Africans then the numbers
Entine quotes are meaningful, but if the reason for a Brit to train
-- Michael Contopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And jon-boy, for every 10 black kids that sprint, probably 1 white
kid sprints... because of a$$'s like yourself who discourage them.
Nah, you'll have to do better than that. There's no question that there
is somewhat of a reverse discrimination
Tom D. wrote:
I think the meaningful part applies to the notion that British athletes
should train harder as Coe suggests in order to beat the Africans. If the
reason for training harder is solely to beat the Africans then the numbers
Entine quotes are meaningful, but if the reason for a Brit
Dan, you live in Oregon. There aren't 50 black kids in the entire state!
malmo
Nah, you'll have to do better than that. There's no question
that there is somewhat of a reverse discrimination against
whites when it comes to sprinting, but I very much doubt
there are 10x as many black
13 matches
Mail list logo
